本文選題：債權(quán)讓與 + 讓與通知�。� 參考：《內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)》2007年碩士論文

【摘要】： 在民商法領(lǐng)域，最重要的就是民法和商法，而就民法而言，最重要的涉及物權(quán)和債權(quán)；而債權(quán)的流通成為滿足當(dāng)事人利益的必然要求。債權(quán)本身就是法律生活的目的，經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值不是暫時(shí)地存在于物權(quán)，在市場經(jīng)濟(jì)條件下，只有通過交易，才能實(shí)現(xiàn)財(cái)產(chǎn)價(jià)值的最大化，從而實(shí)現(xiàn)資源的合理配置。債權(quán)作為一種財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)，在現(xiàn)代社會(huì)是最活躍同時(shí)也代表一個(gè)國家經(jīng)濟(jì)繁榮情況的重要權(quán)利。隨著觀念的更新，債權(quán)本身實(shí)現(xiàn)了從主觀的人身關(guān)系到客觀經(jīng)濟(jì)關(guān)系的推進(jìn)，債務(wù)人的人身責(zé)任逐漸演化為純粹的財(cái)產(chǎn)責(zé)任。于是，債權(quán)自身取得了其應(yīng)有的價(jià)值，債權(quán)由此失去人的色彩而實(shí)現(xiàn)了獨(dú)立財(cái)產(chǎn)化，債權(quán)的非人格化，以及債權(quán)人對其債權(quán)享有的支配權(quán)能，使債權(quán)人自由處分其債權(quán)成為必然，因?yàn)閭鶆?wù)人向誰履行在這里已變得不重要，并且自由處分本身就是支配的當(dāng)然內(nèi)容。由此可以說，債權(quán)財(cái)產(chǎn)化的觀念產(chǎn)生了債權(quán)讓與制度。 而在債權(quán)法中和人們息息相關(guān)，對人們的影響較大的恐怕就是商品房的買賣合同。目前，在我國存在的主要問題是買受人在沒有得到產(chǎn)權(quán)之前又要將該商品房轉(zhuǎn)讓，該種轉(zhuǎn)讓是商品房預(yù)售轉(zhuǎn)讓，，而對于商品房預(yù)售轉(zhuǎn)讓的問題，理論上存在較大分歧，實(shí)踐中的做法也存在很大差異。由于我國現(xiàn)行調(diào)控房地產(chǎn)關(guān)系的法律法規(guī)對商品房預(yù)售的轉(zhuǎn)讓在價(jià)值選擇和定位上持謹(jǐn)慎的立法態(tài)度，缺乏直接的立法規(guī)范，各地對預(yù)售商品房轉(zhuǎn)讓的認(rèn)識不一、做法不一，甚至出現(xiàn)同一地區(qū)前后做法相互矛盾的現(xiàn)象，導(dǎo)致我國預(yù)售商品房轉(zhuǎn)讓市場處于混亂、無序狀態(tài)。因此，在這種情況下本文應(yīng)用了比較法和經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的研究方法，從債權(quán)讓與的角度來分析商品房預(yù)售轉(zhuǎn)讓中存在的問題及原因，并提出解決的對策。文章第一部分主要是對傳統(tǒng)債權(quán)讓與的基本理論作一闡釋；第二部分分析債權(quán)讓與在商品房預(yù)售轉(zhuǎn)讓中的問題及原因；第三部分就商品房預(yù)售轉(zhuǎn)讓的實(shí)現(xiàn)途徑做了分析，并重點(diǎn)對現(xiàn)實(shí)中商品房預(yù)售轉(zhuǎn)讓中的若干問題進(jìn)行了相關(guān)闡釋；第四部分指出了我國商品房預(yù)售轉(zhuǎn)讓的立法缺陷并提出了相關(guān)對策。
[Abstract]:In the field of civil and commercial law, the most important is civil law and commercial law, but in civil law, the most important involves real right and creditor's rights, and the circulation of creditor's rights becomes the inevitable requirement to satisfy the interests of the parties. The creditor's right itself is the purpose of legal life, the economic value does not exist temporarily in the real right, under the market economy condition, only through the transaction, can realize the property value maximization, thus realizes the reasonable disposition of the resources. As a kind of property right, creditor's right is the most active in modern society and also represents an important right of a country's economic prosperity. With the renewal of the concept, the creditor's rights have realized the promotion from subjective personal relationship to objective economic relationship, and the debtor's personal responsibility has gradually evolved into pure property responsibility. As a result, the creditor's rights themselves have acquired their due value, and the creditor's rights have lost their color and thus realized the independence of property, the depersonalization of the creditor's rights, and the ability of the creditors to control their claims. It is inevitable for creditors to dispose of their claims freely, for it is not important who the debtor performs here, and the free disposition itself is the natural content of domination. Thus it can be said that the concept of property of creditor's rights gives rise to the system of assignment of creditor's rights. But in the creditor's right law and people are closely related, the influence to people is probably the commercial housing sale contract. At present, the main problem that exists in our country is that the buyer has to transfer the commercial house before he obtains the property right. The transfer is a pre-sale transfer of the commercial housing, but there is a great difference in theory on the issue of the pre-sale of the commercial house. There are also great differences in practice. As the current laws and regulations regulating the relationship between real estate in our country hold a cautious legislative attitude towards the value selection and orientation of the pre-sale of commercial housing, and lack of direct legislative norms, the understanding and practice of the transfer of pre-sale commercial housing vary from place to place. Even in the same area, the phenomenon of contradictory practices leads to confusion and disorder in the market of pre-sale commercial housing in our country. Therefore, in this case, this paper applies the comparative and economic research methods to analyze the problems and reasons in the pre-sale transfer of commercial housing from the perspective of the transfer of creditor's rights, and puts forward the countermeasures to solve the problem. The first part of the article mainly explains the basic theory of the traditional assignment of creditor's rights; the second part analyzes the problems and reasons of the transfer of creditor's rights in the commercial housing pre-sale transfer; the third part analyzes the ways to realize the pre-sale transfer of commercial housing. The fourth part points out the legislative defects of the pre-sale transfer of commercial housing in China and puts forward the relevant countermeasures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：D923

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 岳s

本文編號：1844822