發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-27 15:16

  本文選題：中小企業(yè)　切入點(diǎn)：企業(yè)名稱權(quán)　出處：《中南大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：企業(yè)名稱權(quán)是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法中的一項(xiàng)重要權(quán)利,具有人格權(quán)、財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)雙重屬性,包括企業(yè)名稱專用權(quán)、企業(yè)名稱變更權(quán)、企業(yè)名稱轉(zhuǎn)讓權(quán)等權(quán)利內(nèi)容。中小企業(yè)的企業(yè)名稱權(quán)對(duì)于所屬企業(yè)的生存、發(fā)展起著至關(guān)重要的作用。中小企業(yè)由于自身存在資金短缺、獨(dú)立性差、市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力弱等缺陷和不足,往往忽視對(duì)其企業(yè)所屬的企業(yè)名稱權(quán)的保護(hù)。我國(guó)現(xiàn)有企業(yè)名稱核準(zhǔn)制度及企業(yè)名稱分級(jí)登記管理體制存在的立法層次較低、核準(zhǔn)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不統(tǒng)一、行政范疇的級(jí)別管理容易忽視市場(chǎng)無(wú)區(qū)域化的實(shí)際等問(wèn)題,加劇了中小企業(yè)名稱權(quán)保護(hù)的難度。國(guó)際上保護(hù)企業(yè)名稱權(quán)有民商法模式、經(jīng)濟(jì)法模式、特殊法模式、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)模式,其中知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)模式保護(hù)具有先進(jìn)性。基于企業(yè)名稱權(quán)來(lái)源重疊,分屬不同的主管部門管理,受不同的法律調(diào)整,保護(hù)范圍不同,一方權(quán)利的確立并非另一權(quán)利設(shè)立的禁止條件,形成與商標(biāo)權(quán)、商號(hào)權(quán)、域名權(quán)、著作權(quán)等權(quán)利沖突。需要依據(jù)公平競(jìng)爭(zhēng)、誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則、保護(hù)在先合法權(quán)利原則、禁止混淆原則、實(shí)質(zhì)相似原則、先申請(qǐng)及不審查原則來(lái)進(jìn)行判斷,解決這些沖突,保護(hù)中小企業(yè)合法權(quán)利。通過(guò)企業(yè)名稱與商標(biāo)的統(tǒng)一使用,改革現(xiàn)行的企業(yè)名稱權(quán)分級(jí)登記管理制度來(lái)減少它們之間的沖突。中小企業(yè)自身也應(yīng)增強(qiáng)企業(yè)名稱權(quán)保護(hù)意識(shí),通過(guò)行政、法律多種途徑保護(hù)自己的合法權(quán)益。同時(shí)改革現(xiàn)行的企業(yè)名稱登記制度,完善企業(yè)名稱評(píng)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn),建立著名企業(yè)名稱制度、完善中小企業(yè)名稱權(quán)的轉(zhuǎn)讓以及使用許可制度,保護(hù)中小企業(yè)名稱權(quán)、打擊侵犯企業(yè)名稱權(quán)的行為,維護(hù)公平競(jìng)爭(zhēng)秩序,促進(jìn)中小企業(yè)的良性發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The right of enterprise name is an important right in intellectual property law. It has the dual attributes of personality right and property right, including the exclusive right of enterprise name, the right of changing enterprise name, The right to name of small and medium-sized enterprises plays a vital role in the survival and development of their own enterprises. Because of their own shortage of funds, small and medium-sized enterprises have poor independence. The weak competitive power of the market often neglects the protection of the enterprise name right to which the enterprise belongs. The existing enterprise name approval system and the enterprise name classification registration management system in our country have lower legislative level, and the approval standard is not uniform. It is easy to ignore the fact that the market is not regionalized by the level management of administrative category, which makes it more difficult to protect the name right of small and medium-sized enterprises. There are civil and commercial law mode, economic law model and special law mode in international protection of enterprise name right. The intellectual property model, in which intellectual property protection is advanced, is based on overlapping sources of enterprise names and rights, which are managed by different competent departments, subject to different legal adjustments, and have different scope of protection. The establishment of the right of one party is not a prohibition condition for the establishment of another right, which conflicts with the rights of trademark, trade name, domain name, copyright, etc. It needs to be based on the principle of fair competition, the principle of good faith and the principle of protecting the prior legal right. The principle of prohibiting confusion, the principle of substantial similarity, the principle of first applying for and not examining to judge, resolve these conflicts, and protect the legal rights of small and medium-sized enterprises. Through the unified use of enterprise names and trademarks, To reduce the conflicts between them, the small and medium-sized enterprises themselves should also enhance their awareness of the protection of enterprise name rights and adopt administrative measures. At the same time, we should reform the current enterprise name registration system, perfect the evaluation standard of the enterprise name, establish a famous enterprise name system, and perfect the transfer and licensing system of the name right of the small and medium-sized enterprises. To protect the right to name of small and medium-sized enterprises, to crack down on the infringement of the right to name, to maintain the order of fair competition, and to promote the benign development of small and medium-sized enterprises.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D923.43

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 范漢云;中國(guó)關(guān)于撤銷不當(dāng)注冊(cè)商標(biāo)的法律規(guī)定及實(shí)施[J];中華商標(biāo);1999年03期

2 潘偉;論商號(hào)權(quán)與商標(biāo)權(quán)的權(quán)利沖突[J];中華商標(biāo);2001年08期

3 羅歇·布特;陳鵬;;法國(guó)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法概要[J];法學(xué)家;1999年03期

4 李永明;麻劍輝;;商標(biāo)權(quán)與商號(hào)權(quán)的權(quán)利沖突及解決途徑[J];法學(xué)家;2002年04期

5 謝曉堯;論識(shí)別性標(biāo)示的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法保護(hù)[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2000年03期

6 王敏;;權(quán)利沖突下企業(yè)商標(biāo)權(quán)與商號(hào)權(quán)的法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與防范[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2008年08期

7 何彩萍;;論商業(yè)名稱權(quán)的法律保護(hù)[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年03期

8 張蕾;;競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法視角下的企業(yè)名稱權(quán)保護(hù)[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年13期

9 田云鵬;一個(gè)亟待解決的問(wèn)題[J];工商行政管理;2000年07期

10 李躍春,吳筠;建立知名企業(yè)字號(hào)制度 探索企業(yè)名稱管理新思路[J];工商行政管理;2000年08期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張術(shù)麟;企業(yè)商業(yè)標(biāo)記權(quán)法律保護(hù)問(wèn)題研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 許艷霞;商標(biāo)權(quán)與在先權(quán)沖突若干法律問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2001年

2 馬錚;商標(biāo)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突研究[D];華南師范大學(xué);2004年

3 劉敏;商標(biāo)權(quán)的刑法保護(hù)[D];武漢大學(xué);2004年

4 趙曉俊;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突問(wèn)題研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2004年

5 裴縝;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突及其整合[D];華中科技大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1672068