【摘要】：判斷"非誠勿擾"節(jié)目究竟有沒有侵犯在先注冊商標權利,應首先明確中國商標侵權判斷的標準,再照侵權標準,進一步明確本案侵權是否最終成立。本案中,江蘇電視臺的"非誠勿擾"與金阿歡的在先商標未構成相同服務上的相同商標,并且,二者服務也未形成類似,在沒有明顯反證情形下,可以直接江蘇電視臺侵權不成立。本文在此基礎上試想了消費者混淆情形,得出的結論是,消費者混淆也不會存在,因而更進一步證明了江蘇電視臺侵權不成立。
[Abstract]:To judge whether the program "if you are the one" has infringed the right of registered trademark, we should first make clear the standard of judging the infringement of trademark in China, and then, according to the standard of infringement, further determine whether the infringement of this case is finally established. In this case, the "if you are the one" trademark of Jiangsu TV Station and Jin Ahuan's previous trademark did not constitute the same trademark on the same service, and the two services did not form the same, in the absence of obvious countervailing cases, Can direct Jiangsu TV station tort does not hold water. On the basis of this, this paper tries to imagine the situation of consumer confusion, and draws the conclusion that consumer confusion will not exist, so it further proves that the infringement of Jiangsu TV station is untenable.
【作者單位】： 中國國際貿易促進委員會專利商標事務所;
【分類號】：D923.43

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 李婧;;假辦晚會斂錢財[J];中國防偽報道;2002年02期

，

本文編號：2166314