本文選題：被遺忘權(quán) + 互聯(lián)網(wǎng)�。� 參考：《廣西師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：現(xiàn)代網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)等科技的進(jìn)步給人們的生活帶來很大的變化。在現(xiàn)代社會中,人們使用互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的方式已經(jīng)不僅僅局限于使用電腦,手機(jī)技術(shù)的發(fā)展以及相關(guān)網(wǎng)絡(luò)軟件的不斷完善使越來越多的人可以使用互聯(lián)網(wǎng)并享受網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)等科學(xué)技術(shù)的發(fā)展給他們帶來的便利生活。但是網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)等科學(xué)技術(shù)的發(fā)展也是一把雙刃劍,在我們享受科學(xué)技術(shù)發(fā)展給我們的生活帶來便利的同時,也應(yīng)當(dāng)注意科學(xué)技術(shù)的發(fā)展給我們的合法權(quán)益帶來的潛在隱患和威脅。人們通過各種網(wǎng)絡(luò)軟件及網(wǎng)絡(luò)媒體在網(wǎng)絡(luò)上與他人進(jìn)行交流,但在使用互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的過程中我們都會將大量個人信息數(shù)據(jù)上傳至網(wǎng)絡(luò),而網(wǎng)絡(luò)后臺空間又將這些個人信息數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行永久的保存。然而數(shù)字技術(shù)的發(fā)展和互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的全球化使網(wǎng)絡(luò)逐漸從“默認(rèn)的遺忘”走向“默認(rèn)的記憶”,越來越先進(jìn)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)以及數(shù)據(jù)處理技術(shù)使我們的個人信息數(shù)據(jù)處于一種不安全的狀況,甚至我們的一言一行以及發(fā)表在網(wǎng)絡(luò)上的照片等個人信息數(shù)據(jù)都會在我們刪除之后仍然在網(wǎng)絡(luò)數(shù)據(jù)后臺進(jìn)行保存,而這些“網(wǎng)絡(luò)記憶”可能會在未來的某一天給我們個人的名譽(yù)、工作和生活帶來不可預(yù)料的潛在危險以及負(fù)面影響,阻礙人們個人的人格發(fā)展以及追求我們想要的生活。面對網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)等科學(xué)技術(shù)的發(fā)展給我國公民的合法權(quán)益帶來的新問題、新挑戰(zhàn),我國法律體系沒有做到與時俱進(jìn),無法有效的解決這些問題,全面、切實(shí)保護(hù)我國公民的合法權(quán)益。面對網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)等科學(xué)技術(shù)的發(fā)展給個人信息數(shù)據(jù)帶來的挑戰(zhàn),歐盟地區(qū)率先提出并設(shè)立被遺忘權(quán),并審判了全世界第一例被遺忘權(quán)案,支持了岡薩雷斯的被遺忘權(quán)請求,判決谷歌公司將有關(guān)信息數(shù)據(jù)鏈接進(jìn)行刪除,并保證人們無法通過谷歌相關(guān)鏈接找到相關(guān)信息數(shù)據(jù)。判決一出,引起了全世界法學(xué)界的關(guān)注。隨后世界各國紛紛效仿并設(shè)立與被遺忘權(quán)有關(guān)的規(guī)范性法律文件對公民的個人信息數(shù)據(jù)權(quán)益進(jìn)行保護(hù)。我國在40多部規(guī)范性法律文件中,都可見到有關(guān)個人信息保護(hù)的法律條款或者體現(xiàn)被遺忘權(quán)精神的法律條款。但由于過于散亂,不成體系,甚至有的規(guī)范性法律文件之間相互沖突,造成我國法律體系在此方面存在空白、漏洞的情況,導(dǎo)致在實(shí)際操作中相關(guān)規(guī)范性法律文件可用性不大,而個人信息數(shù)據(jù)作為一項體現(xiàn)人權(quán)以及人格權(quán)屬性的合法權(quán)益,卻在人們的有關(guān)合法權(quán)益受到侵害時無法通過人格權(quán)相關(guān)權(quán)利進(jìn)行保護(hù),并且也無法通過我國現(xiàn)有的有關(guān)被遺忘權(quán)的規(guī)范性法律文件得到全面的保護(hù)。故我國應(yīng)當(dāng)在借鑒西方國家相關(guān)立法基礎(chǔ)上,構(gòu)建專門的《信息數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)法》,并在其中確定被遺忘權(quán),彌補(bǔ)我國在此方面的立法缺失,使公民在受到該方面合法權(quán)益的損害時可以有法可依,使法官在斷案時有法可循。筆者以期通過本文的寫作,給我國構(gòu)建被遺忘權(quán),保護(hù)公民信息數(shù)據(jù)權(quán)益方面提供一些可行的建議。本文主要從四部分探討被遺忘權(quán):第一部分介紹了被遺忘權(quán)產(chǎn)生的基礎(chǔ),包括被遺忘權(quán)產(chǎn)生的事實(shí)基礎(chǔ)、理論基礎(chǔ)以及法律基礎(chǔ)。在研究分析國內(nèi)外對被遺忘權(quán)概念的各種意見之后,提出了筆者對于被遺忘權(quán)概念的看法,并且通過對被遺忘權(quán)概念的分析確定被遺忘權(quán)的特征;第二部分主要探討被遺忘權(quán)的法律關(guān)系,并且將被遺忘權(quán)與其它相關(guān)權(quán)利進(jìn)行比較分析,在此基礎(chǔ)上提出被遺忘權(quán)存在的必要性和重要性,對被遺忘權(quán)進(jìn)行必要的理論研究與分析;第三部分將國內(nèi)外被遺忘權(quán)法律制度進(jìn)行比較考察,并對相關(guān)案例進(jìn)行分析,包括歐盟、美國以及我國被遺忘權(quán)法律制度以及有關(guān)案例進(jìn)行分析并從中獲得一定的啟示,為第四部分的論述打下基礎(chǔ);第四部分在前三部分的研究與論述的基礎(chǔ)之上,結(jié)合我國的具體實(shí)際情況,主要研究在我國如何構(gòu)建被遺忘權(quán),侵犯被遺忘權(quán)的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn),構(gòu)建被遺忘權(quán)后如何行使被遺忘權(quán)以及應(yīng)當(dāng)如何對被遺忘權(quán)進(jìn)行必要的限制提出可行性的建議。并希望可以借此給我國相關(guān)立法提供參考,促進(jìn)我國信息數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)方面的立法。
[Abstract]:In modern society, the way people use the Internet is not only limited to the use of computers, the development of mobile technology and the continuous improvement of related network software so that more and more people can use the Internet and enjoy the science and technology of network technology in modern society. The development of the technology brings convenience to them. But the development of science and technology, such as network technology, is also a double-edged sword. While we enjoy the convenience of the development of science and technology to our lives, we should also pay attention to the potential hidden dangers and threats of the development of science and technology to our legitimate rights and interests. The network media communicate with others on the Internet, but in the process of using the Internet, we all upload a large number of personal information data to the network, and the network backend space keeps these personal information data permanently. However, the development of digital technology and the globalization of the Internet have made the network gradually from the "default". Forget to go to the default memory. Increasingly advanced networks and data processing technology make our personal information data in an unsafe condition. Even our personal information, such as our words and lines, and photos published on the network, will still be kept in the backstage of the network data after we delete it. Some "network memory" may bring unforeseen potential danger and negative influence to our personal reputation, work and life in the future one day, hinder people's personal development and pursue the life we want. New questions about the legitimate rights and interests of our citizens face the development of science and technology such as network technology. Problems, new challenges, China's legal system does not keep pace with the times, can not effectively solve these problems, comprehensively and effectively protect the legitimate rights and interests of the citizens of our country. Facing the challenge of the development of science and technology such as network technology to personal information data, the EU has taken the lead in putting forward and setting up the right to be forgotten, and has tried the first case of the world to be left out. The forgetting case, which supported Gonzales's forgetting claim, decided that the Google Corporation would delete the information data link and ensure that people could not find relevant information through the Google link. The legal document of the law protects the rights and interests of citizens' personal information and data. In our more than 40 normative legal documents, we can see the legal provisions on the protection of personal information or the legal provisions that embody the spirit of the right to be forgotten. There is a gap in the legal system in our country, and the situation of loopholes leads to the lack of availability of relevant normative legal documents in actual operation, while personal information data, as a legitimate rights and interests of human rights and personality rights, can not be guaranteed by the rights related to personality rights when people's legal rights and interests are infringed. And it can not be fully protected by the existing legal documents on the right to be forgotten in our country. Therefore, our country should build a special "information and data protection law" on the basis of the relevant legislation of the western countries and determine the right to be forgotten in it, to make up for the lack of legislation in this area and to make the citizens in this respect. When the legal rights and interests are damaged, the judge can follow the law, so that the judge can follow the law when the case is broken. I hope to provide some feasible suggestions for China to build the right to be forgotten and protect the rights and interests of citizens' information data through this article. This article mainly discusses the right to be forgotten in the four part: the first part introduces the foundation of the right to be forgotten. After analyzing various opinions about the concept of the right to be forgotten at home and abroad, the author puts forward the author's views on the concept of the right to be forgotten and determines the characteristics of the right to be forgotten by the analysis of the concept of the right to be forgotten; the second part mainly discusses the law of the right to be forgotten. On the basis of the comparison and analysis of the right to be forgotten and other related rights, the necessity and importance of the existence of the right to be forgotten and the necessary theoretical research and Analysis on the right to be forgotten are made on this basis. The third part compares the legal system of the right to be forgotten at home and abroad, and analyzes the relevant cases, including the EU and the United States. The state and the legal system of the right to be forgotten in China and the relevant cases are analyzed and gained some inspiration to lay the foundation for the discussion of the fourth part; the fourth part, based on the research and discussion of the first three parts, and the concrete actual situation of our country, mainly studies how to construct the right to be forgotten and to infringe the right to be forgotten in our country. Judging standards, how to build the right to be forgotten after the right to be forgotten and how to put forward the necessary restrictions on the right to be forgotten, and hope to provide reference for relevant legislation in our country and promote the legislation of information data protection in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳兆祥;;《關(guān)于裁判文書引用法律、法規(guī)等規(guī)范性法律文件的規(guī)定》的理解與適用[J];人民司法;2009年23期

2 徐向華，，黃卉;論我國規(guī)范性法律文件條標(biāo)的增設(shè)[J];政治與法律;1994年04期

3 杜巧閣;;針砭法律文本書名號的使用問題[J];華北水利水電學(xué)院學(xué)報(社科版);2009年06期

4 ;最高人民法院關(guān)于裁判文書引用法律、法規(guī)等規(guī)范性法律文件的規(guī)定[J];司法業(yè)務(wù)文選;2010年01期

5 裘敬梅;;社會論證——俄羅斯公民參與立法的重要形式[J];吉林人大;2010年06期

6 劉宏明;;林業(yè)立法有關(guān)問題的思考[J];中國林業(yè);2007年07期

7 冷遠(yuǎn)鑫;;空白罪狀補(bǔ)充規(guī)范的范圍界定[J];遼寧警專學(xué)報;2013年02期

8 黃金榮;;法律效力定義研究述評[J];研究生法學(xué);1998年04期

9 黃立新;陳論;陳剛泰;王靚;沈龍強(qiáng);李金艷;;上市公司分類監(jiān)管研究[J];證券法苑;2013年02期

10 歐陽晨紅;;淺談我國法律規(guī)范性文件出版的現(xiàn)狀[J];法律文獻(xiàn)信息與研究;2001年03期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前4條

1 ;關(guān)于裁判文書引用法律、法規(guī)等規(guī)范性法律文件的規(guī)定[N];人民法院報;2009年

2 記者 梁洪　通訊員 覃艷媚;廣西出臺意見 規(guī)范法律文件引用[N];檢察日報;2011年

3 特約法治評論員 師安寧;案例裁判規(guī)則解析(三)[N];人民法院報;2013年

4 郭相宏;法官應(yīng)奉行“司法消極主義”[N];人民代表報;2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 靳一鳴;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)時代下的被遺忘權(quán)[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2017年

2 王志斌;論規(guī)范性法律文件中的模糊詞語[D];華南理工大學(xué);2010年

3 李珊珊;市場背景下藥品行業(yè)監(jiān)管的法律規(guī)制[D];吉林財經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

4 刁菊波;司法·公正·論[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

本文編號：2069795