本文選題：知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法院 + 技術(shù)調(diào)查官��； 參考：《法律適用》2015年10期

【摘要】：站在人類膜拜自然尊重歷史的大視野,我國設(shè)立知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法院是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)司法保護機制,發(fā)展完善的歷史選擇,是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)司法保護長期實踐的理性探索。以廣州知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法院為樣本,述論知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法院在技術(shù)調(diào)查官制度、法官遴選制度以及法官作為審理者負責案件的審理和裁判等改革事項,為什么需要,如何可能,傳達出另一種厚重與透徹。
[Abstract]:Standing in the great vision of human worship of nature and respecting history, the establishment of intellectual property court in China is the judicial protection mechanism of intellectual property, the development of a perfect historical choice, a rational exploration of the long-term practice of intellectual property judicial protection. A sample of Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court on the system of technical investigation officers in the court of intellectual property rights and the selection system of judges As well as judges, as judges, are responsible for reforming cases such as trial and adjudication, why and how to convey another thick and thorough way.
【作者單位】： 廣州知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法院;
【分類號】：D923.4;D926.22

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 王亞軍;;論王安石的法律思想[J];理論界;2006年12期

，

本文編號：1980861