本文選題：繼承法 + 遺囑�。� 參考：《法律適用》2017年21期

【摘要】：繼承法以證據(jù)方法規(guī)范為鮮明特色,如遺囑或者遺贈扶養(yǎng)協(xié)議均可由書證、證人證言、視聽資料等證據(jù)方法表彰,此類證據(jù)方法規(guī)范的核心問題在于相應(yīng)的證據(jù)能力和證明力。遺囑的形式要求嚴(yán)格,是整個民法制度中對法律行為形式規(guī)定最為詳盡的部分。應(yīng)該與時俱進地將遺囑或者遺贈扶養(yǎng)協(xié)議的證據(jù)方法擴及電子遺囑對應(yīng)的電子數(shù)據(jù),規(guī)定遺囑形式瑕疵補正制度,賦予各種遺囑形式平等的法律效力(證明力),不宜將公證遺囑效力置于絕對優(yōu)先的地位。
[Abstract]:Inheritance law is characterized by evidence method norm, such as will or bequest maintenance agreement, which can be commended by documentary evidence, witness testimony, audio-visual materials and so on. The core problem of this kind of evidence method criterion lies in the corresponding evidence ability and proof power. The form of will is the most detailed part of the civil law system. The evidence method of the will or legacy maintenance agreement should be extended with the times to the electronic data corresponding to the electronic will, and the system of correcting the defects in the form of the will should be stipulated. To give equal legal effect to various forms of wills, it is not appropriate to give absolute priority to the validity of notarized wills.
【作者單位】： 中國政法大學(xué)民商經(jīng)濟法學(xué)院;
【基金】：2015年第一批國家社科基金后期資助項目“民法證據(jù)規(guī)范論:案件事實的形成與民法學(xué)方法論的完善”(項目編號:15FFX005) 2014年國家社科基金重大項目“民法典編纂重大疑難問題研究”(項目編號:14ZDC017)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D923.5

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 溫向麗;尹偉民;;合同要式性對證據(jù)方法的影響[J];中國青年政治學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年02期

，

本文編號：1957568