本文選題：C2C + 消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)��； 參考：《延邊大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：電子商務(wù)作為一種新興的經(jīng)濟(jì)模式,正給我們的生活帶來(lái)各方面的變化,它不僅僅改變了傳統(tǒng)意義上的生產(chǎn)、經(jīng)營(yíng)和管理,更加改變了傳統(tǒng)經(jīng)濟(jì)體制下人們固有的消費(fèi)模式,帶來(lái)更加方便,直觀的消費(fèi)體驗(yàn)�？墒请娮由虅�(wù)與生俱來(lái)的虛擬性、技術(shù)性、全球性和無(wú)紙張性等特征,使得許多糾紛發(fā)生的時(shí)候,傳統(tǒng)的法律制度顯得有些蒼白無(wú)力,如果強(qiáng)加于此,就會(huì)帶來(lái)一些不公平,違背法律精神的結(jié)果。本人身為一名消費(fèi)者,更是一名法學(xué)學(xué)生,也常常感到此中的無(wú)奈和緊迫。本文第一部分著重介紹了電子商務(wù)的一些基礎(chǔ)概念和現(xiàn)狀,分析總結(jié)當(dāng)下研究這個(gè)課題的迫切性和重要性�；ヂ�(lián)網(wǎng)給我們帶來(lái)了人類在過(guò)去不可想象的改變,對(duì)于多數(shù)人而言他們已經(jīng)無(wú)法離開網(wǎng)絡(luò)來(lái)交流感情和思想,而近些年以淘寶、天貓、京東為代表的電子商務(wù)的興起更加讓現(xiàn)代人的消費(fèi)模式發(fā)生了巨變,我們體驗(yàn)宅在家中,逛遍世界品牌街,支付寶在手中,所見即所得。第二部開始引入一個(gè)經(jīng)典案例,通過(guò)分析案例了解我國(guó)目前C2C交易當(dāng)中體現(xiàn)的問題,存在的不足。案例中的當(dāng)事人所遇到的問題,就是當(dāng)下C2C交易中消費(fèi)者常見的問題,所犯的錯(cuò)誤也是消費(fèi)者容易產(chǎn)生的認(rèn)識(shí)誤區(qū),這種認(rèn)識(shí)誤區(qū)使得消費(fèi)者在維權(quán)的時(shí)候產(chǎn)生了困難,而且,在審判過(guò)程中我們也可以看到存在一些問題,都是由于C2C的相關(guān)立法發(fā)展不成熟,缺乏相應(yīng)統(tǒng)一有效的法律法規(guī)而引起的。第三部分對(duì)于案例中當(dāng)事人敗訴原因進(jìn)行了一些簡(jiǎn)單的介紹和分析。我國(guó)電子商務(wù)消費(fèi)者權(quán)益難以得到保障的基本原因有：1.立法層次過(guò)低；2.網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)者維權(quán)途徑選擇少；3.侵權(quán)主體難以確認(rèn)。造成了很多消費(fèi)者維權(quán)難的局面。第四部分主要介紹了本人通過(guò)閱讀大量資料、文獻(xiàn)對(duì)現(xiàn)今形勢(shì)下的電子商務(wù)消費(fèi)者合法權(quán)益保護(hù)問題的相關(guān)人士和想法,并對(duì)于C2C消費(fèi)者侵權(quán)處理的途徑完善的一些建議,以及對(duì)于這些建議的合理性和可操作性作出了論證。
[Abstract]:E-commerce, as a new economic model, is bringing changes to all aspects of our life. It not only changes the production, management and management in the traditional sense, but also changes the inherent consumption pattern of people under the traditional economic system. Bring more convenient, intuitive consumer experience. However, the inherent virtual, technical, global and paperless characteristics of electronic commerce have made many disputes appear to be feeble when the traditional legal system is imposed on them, which will lead to some unfairness. The result of a violation of the spirit of the law. As a consumer and a law student, I often feel helpless and urgent. The first part of this paper mainly introduces some basic concepts and present situation of electronic commerce, analyzes and summarizes the urgency and importance of the current research on this subject. The Internet has brought us unimaginable changes in the past, and for most people they have been unable to leave the Internet to exchange feelings and ideas, and in recent years Taobao, Tmall, The rise of electronic commerce represented by JingDong has changed the consumption pattern of modern people. We experience living at home, walking around the world brand street, Alipay in hand, what we see is what we get. The second part begins to introduce a classic case, through the analysis of cases to understand the current C2C transactions in China, the shortcomings of the existing. The problems encountered by the parties involved in the case are the common problems of consumers in current C2C transactions, and the mistakes they make are also errors that consumers are prone to misunderstand. This misunderstanding makes consumers have difficulties in protecting their rights, and, In the course of the trial, we can also see that there are some problems, which are caused by the immature development of C2C legislation and the lack of corresponding uniform and effective laws and regulations. The third part introduces and analyzes the cause of the litigant's defeat in the case. The basic reason for the difficulty of protecting the rights and interests of electronic commerce consumers in China is: 1. 1. The legislative level is too low. Online consumer rights options less than 3. The subject of infringement is difficult to confirm. Created a lot of consumer rights difficult situation. The fourth part mainly introduces the author's views on the legal rights and interests protection of e-commerce consumers under the current situation through reading a large number of materials, and some suggestions on how to improve the ways to deal with C2C consumers' infringement. The rationality and maneuverability of these suggestions are also demonstrated.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.8

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 韓洪今;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供商的法律定位[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2009年02期

2 曾建飛;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供商對(duì)消費(fèi)者之補(bǔ)充責(zé)任[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年09期

3 溫曉蕓;;對(duì)垃圾郵件侵犯網(wǎng)絡(luò)隱私權(quán)的法律規(guī)制[J];西部法學(xué)評(píng)論;2008年05期

4 方曉燕;姜凌;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)購(gòu)物滿意度影響因素研究[J];江蘇商論;2012年03期

5 劉曉純;馬兆婧;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供商的民事法律責(zé)任——以淘寶網(wǎng)為例[J];天津大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年03期

6 程路路;;論如何提高網(wǎng)絡(luò)購(gòu)物消費(fèi)者的品牌忠誠(chéng)度[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2012年07期

，

本文編號(hào)：1931578