本文選題：合理使用 + 注明出處　； 參考：《知識產(chǎn)權》2017年06期

【摘要】：著作權法中的注明出處義務關涉的是著作權人的人身權益,并非合理使用的構成要件,而是使用人在使用他人作品時應負有的獨立義務。合理使用人未注明出處的,并不導致原本屬于合理使用的情形成為侵害著作財產(chǎn)權的行為,但應承擔消除影響或賠禮道歉的民事責任。注明出處與署名不同,未注明出處的并不一定屬于剽竊。只有使用人使用他人作品超過必要限度,且未署名或注明出處,才構成剽竊。即在合理使用行為與剽竊行為之間存在獨立的未注明出處的侵權行為。
[Abstract]:The provenance obligation in copyright law concerns the personal rights and interests of the copyright owner and is not the constituent element of reasonable use, but the independent obligation that the user should have when using the works of others. If the reasonable user fails to indicate the source, it will not result in the infringement of the property right of the works, but shall bear the civil liability of eliminating the influence or apologizing. The source is different from the signature, not necessarily plagiarism. Plagiarism occurs only if the user uses someone else's work beyond the necessary limit and does not sign or refer to it. That is, there is an independent unnamed tort between rational use and plagiarism.
【作者單位】： 華東政法大學;
【基金】：國家社會科學基金重大項目(142DC020)“互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領域知識產(chǎn)權重大立法問題研究”階段性成果
【分類號】：D923.41
，

本文編號：1874287