本文選題：共有人 + 優(yōu)先購買權(quán)��； 參考：《內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：優(yōu)先購買權(quán)是指某一共有人或承租人在其他共有人或出租人有償轉(zhuǎn)讓其共有份額或者其所有的財產(chǎn)時,在同等條件下享有的比共有人以外的第三人優(yōu)先購買的權(quán)利。在2007年實施的《物權(quán)法》中我國就規(guī)定了優(yōu)先購買權(quán)制度,但是此項制度的規(guī)定還不夠全面,法律并沒有對優(yōu)先購買權(quán)制度具體如何行使進(jìn)行全面詳盡的規(guī)定。即使后來的相關(guān)司法解釋對這一制度進(jìn)行了一定程度的完善,但是依然不能解決優(yōu)先購買權(quán)制度在實際適用中產(chǎn)生的問題。鑒于此,作者運用案例分析和歸納分析等方法,針對優(yōu)先購買權(quán)制度在司法實踐中出現(xiàn)的問題進(jìn)行探討和研究,并得出最終結(jié)論,以達(dá)到保護(hù)權(quán)利人利益的目的。本文除引言和結(jié)論外分為四個部分。第一部分主要分析“轉(zhuǎn)讓”的含義及其在實踐中的表現(xiàn),并提出應(yīng)對轉(zhuǎn)讓進(jìn)行限縮解釋的觀點,同時針對拍賣實質(zhì)上是一種轉(zhuǎn)讓方式的現(xiàn)實,分析拍賣如何適用優(yōu)先購買權(quán)問題。另外,作者還認(rèn)為《物權(quán)法》第97條仍然適用優(yōu)先購買權(quán),并提出了對《關(guān)于民法通則的意見》第92條規(guī)定的理解,以及此規(guī)定中的優(yōu)先購買權(quán)不同于《物權(quán)法》101條規(guī)定的優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的觀點。第二部分提出了在權(quán)利人行使優(yōu)先購買權(quán)行使過程中應(yīng)該注意的問題,例如對于“同等條件”的理解與認(rèn)定、出賣人的通知義務(wù)以及主張優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的期限問題。第三部分著重分析了優(yōu)先購買權(quán)行使的問題。分析了出賣人和優(yōu)先購買權(quán)人的合同有效以及出賣人和第三人的合同也有效時的雙重合同的效力問題,并對行使優(yōu)先購買權(quán)后責(zé)任承擔(dān)問題提出了自己的觀點。另外作者還分析了行使優(yōu)先購買權(quán)對于共有份額物權(quán)變動的影響。第四部分主要解決優(yōu)先購買權(quán)行使中的權(quán)利沖突問題與解決途徑。由于在司法實踐中可能會出現(xiàn)多個共有人同時行使優(yōu)先購買權(quán)以及共有人與承租人同時行使權(quán)力的問題,這會給司法實踐帶來一定困擾。所以在這部分中,作者首先解決共有人之間優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的沖突問題并提出合理的解決途徑,其次解決共有人與承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)之間的沖突問題并提出解決途徑。
[Abstract]:The preemptive right refers to the preemptive right enjoyed by a certain person or lessee under the same conditions than the third party other than the co-owner when the other co-owners or lessors transfer their common shares or all their property at the same time. The system of preemptive right has been stipulated in the Law of Real right in 2007, but the regulation of this system is not comprehensive enough, and the law does not have a comprehensive and detailed regulation on how to exercise the system of preemptive right. Even though the relevant judicial explanations have improved the system to a certain extent, it still can not solve the problem of the pre-emptive right system in the practical application. In view of this, the author makes use of the methods of case analysis and inductive analysis to discuss and study the problems in the judicial practice of the preemptive right system, and draws the final conclusion in order to achieve the purpose of protecting the interests of the obligee. In addition to the introduction and conclusions, this paper is divided into four parts. The first part mainly analyzes the meaning of "transfer" and its performance in practice, and puts forward the point of view that the transfer should be interpreted in restriction and contraction, and at the same time, it aims at the fact that auction is essentially a form of transfer. This paper analyzes how to apply the preemptive right to auction. In addition, the author holds that Article 97 of the Real Law still applies to the right of preemption, and gives an understanding of the provisions of Article 92 of the General principles of Civil Law. And the preemptive right in this regulation is different from the preemptive right stipulated in Article 101 of the Real right Law. The second part puts forward some problems that should be paid attention to in the exercise of preemptive right, such as the understanding and recognition of "equal conditions", the seller's obligation to notify and the time limit of preemption. The third part focuses on the issue of the exercise of the preemptive right. This paper analyzes the validity of the contract between the seller and the preemptive party and the double contract when the contract between the seller and the third party is also valid, and puts forward his own views on the responsibility after exercising the preemptive right. In addition, the author also analyzes the influence of the exercise of preemption right on the change of common share real right. The fourth part mainly resolves the conflict of rights in the exercise of preemptive right. In the judicial practice, there may appear the problems of several co-owners exercising the preemptive right at the same time and the co-owners and the lessees exercising the power at the same time, which will bring some troubles to the judicial practice. So in this part, the author first solves the conflict of the preemptive right between the co-owners and puts forward a reasonable way to solve the problem, and then solves the conflict between the co-owner and the lessee of the preemptive right and puts forward the solution.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃建中;共有關(guān)系中的優(yōu)先購買權(quán)研究[J];法律適用;2005年04期

2 曹健;;按份共有人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)若干問題探析[J];工會論壇(山東省工會管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報);2010年05期

3 李志忠;;優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的類型及其適用范圍[J];甘肅高師學(xué)報;2007年02期

4 陳晨;;淺談共有中優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的制度設(shè)計——結(jié)合物權(quán)法的出臺為視角探討[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年06期

5 常鵬翱;;論優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的行使要件[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2013年06期

6 宋良剛;范小華;;承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)之侵權(quán)賠償問題的理論與實證研究[J];法律適用;2014年02期

7 張弛;關(guān)于優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的若干法律問題探討[J];淮北煤師院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2001年Z1期

8 鄭定鋒;;論優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的效力[J];今日南國(中旬刊);2010年11期

9 毛成;;承租人行使優(yōu)先購買權(quán)之同等條件標(biāo)準(zhǔn)探究[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年06期

10 顧聞;;論我國優(yōu)先購買權(quán)制度的完善[J];商品與質(zhì)量;2012年S4期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 張志勇;按份共有人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

2 武寧;論共有人的優(yōu)先購買權(quán)[D];鄭州大學(xué);2007年

3 張揚;共有人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)研究[D];中國青年政治學(xué)院;2012年

4 王倩;共有人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)[D];西南政法大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1874035