本文選題：商事合同 + 商事合同審判　； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：在我國民商合一的立法體例下,立法并沒有對商事合同和民事合同進(jìn)行區(qū)分,審判實(shí)踐也沒有明確地區(qū)分民事合同審判與商事合同審判。采用民事合同審判思維來對待商事合同審判,忽略了商法思維在商事審判中的運(yùn)用。但,由于商事合同的特殊性,商事審判中商法思維的缺失不僅不利于商事糾紛的解決,也阻礙了商事活動(dòng)的發(fā)展。本文以商事合同為切入點(diǎn),首先將商事合同定義為一方或雙方當(dāng)事人為商事主體所簽訂的合同,并且結(jié)合理論基礎(chǔ)與審判實(shí)踐,分析商事合同的特殊性,闡述商事合同審判與商法思維的契合性。其次,本文通過案例說明商事合同審判的現(xiàn)狀,從而表明在商事合同審判中適用商法思維的必要性以及重要性。最后,本文指出了在商事合同審判中運(yùn)用商法思維的具體體現(xiàn)。本文認(rèn)為,商事合同由于合同主體,客體,合同目的等與一般民事合同相區(qū)別,因此便要求用不同于民事合同審判的思維來處理商事合同糾紛。商法思維區(qū)別于民法思維,在追求公平的同時(shí)也強(qiáng)調(diào)效率,通過運(yùn)用商法獨(dú)特的思維理念,只有形成商事合同審判獨(dú)特的原則及思維,才能在審判實(shí)踐中更有針對性地處理商事合同糾紛,從而產(chǎn)生更好的法律效果和社會效果。本文在論述商法思維在商事合同審判中的運(yùn)用時(shí),從合同的內(nèi)容審查方面,合同的效力判斷方面,合同違約金方面以及法律適用方面對商法思維的運(yùn)用進(jìn)行了說明。通過對商事合同進(jìn)行理論比較,實(shí)踐分析,對商法思維的運(yùn)用提出看法。
[Abstract]:In our country, the legislation does not distinguish commercial contract from civil contract, and the trial practice does not distinguish between civil contract trial and commercial contract trial.The application of commercial law thinking in commercial trial is neglected.However, due to the particularity of commercial contract, the lack of commercial law thinking in commercial trial is not only unfavorable to the settlement of commercial disputes, but also hinders the development of commercial activities.This article regards the commercial contract as the breakthrough point, first defines the commercial contract as the contract signed by one or both parties as the commercial subject, and analyzes the particularity of the commercial contract by combining the theoretical basis and the trial practice.This paper expounds the consonance between commercial contract trial and commercial law thinking.Secondly, this paper explains the current situation of commercial contract trial through cases, and then shows the necessity and importance of applying commercial law thinking in commercial contract trial.Finally, this paper points out the concrete embodiment of commercial law thinking in commercial contract trial.This paper holds that because the subject, object and purpose of the contract are different from the common civil contract, the commercial contract needs to deal with the dispute of the commercial contract by the thinking different from the civil contract trial.Commercial law thinking is different from civil law thinking, and emphasizes efficiency while pursuing fairness. By using the unique thinking concept of commercial law, only the unique principles and thinking of commercial contract trial can be formed.In order to deal with the dispute of commercial contract more pertinently in the trial practice, it can produce better legal effect and social effect.In this paper, the application of commercial law thinking in commercial contract trial is discussed. The application of commercial law thinking is explained from the aspects of contract content review, contract validity judgment, contract liquidated damages and the application of law.Through the theoretical comparison and practical analysis of commercial contract, the author puts forward some opinions on the application of commercial law thinking.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 施揚(yáng);;論商事合同中“意思”與“表示”的差異[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2007年33期

2 樊濤;;我國商事合同制度的解析與重構(gòu)[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2008年06期

3 梁開斌;;商事合同糾紛審判對象范圍的界定[J];商業(yè)研究;2009年05期

4 姜巖;;論商事合同“合意瑕疵”的救濟(jì)[J];黨政干部學(xué)刊;2009年07期

5 張宇;張睿;;關(guān)于建構(gòu)我國商事合同制度的路徑構(gòu)想[J];經(jīng)營管理者;2011年02期

6 葉敏;;論商事合同解除的法律后果[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2006年11期

7 王永新;;《聯(lián)合國國際貨物銷售合同公約》與《國際商事合同通則》之比較[J];商業(yè)文化(學(xué)術(shù)版);2009年05期

8 ;最高人民法院關(guān)于審理涉外民事或商事合同糾紛案件法律適用若干問題的規(guī)定[J];Beijing Review;2008年19期

9 曹守f，

本文編號：1758413