本文選題：締約過失責(zé)任　切入點(diǎn)：第三人　出處：《浙江大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：第三人締約過失責(zé)任是指締約當(dāng)事人因第三人的錯(cuò)誤致使合同未締結(jié)或者合同歸于無效的第三人的責(zé)任。第三人締約過失責(zé)任是德國通過司法判例發(fā)展出的一項(xiàng)制度,我國并沒有該項(xiàng)制度。在德國法中,第三人締約過失責(zé)任是通過擴(kuò)充合同的責(zé)任保護(hù)范圍來予以解決,而我國民法與德國有著千絲萬縷的聯(lián)系,第三人締約過失責(zé)任是否需要引入我國值得深思,需要審慎論證。本文第一部分介紹了德國第三人締約過失責(zé)任的緣起,德國是通過司法判例漸進(jìn)發(fā)展出第三人締約過失責(zé)任的,透過種種案型,我們明確了德國第三人締約過失責(zé)任的第三人的范圍和調(diào)整案型,從而為后文的論證提供了材料。第二部分的前半部分指出學(xué)界也有反對(duì)適用第三人締約過失責(zé)任之聲,提出完全可以適用侵權(quán)責(zé)任和附保護(hù)第三人合同解決,并指出第三人締約過失責(zé)任本身的不足之處。后半部分筆者隨后逐一對(duì)這些見解進(jìn)行分析,指出德國法上第三人締約過失責(zé)任在我國完全有適用的必要,完全可以類型化后作為我國侵權(quán)法中一項(xiàng)特殊的侵權(quán)責(zé)任,并說明了其在我國適用會(huì)帶來立法上、理論上和實(shí)務(wù)上的積極意義。本文第三部分,通過分別對(duì)第三人締約過失責(zé)任制度可與第三人欺詐、履行輔助人和代理人責(zé)任等相關(guān)制度協(xié)調(diào)的分析,論證了第三人締約過失責(zé)任在我國存在的獨(dú)特意義。在我國民法典尚未制定完成的情況下,筆者認(rèn)為現(xiàn)行法中也可以涵射此種制度,在未來民法典中應(yīng)該將第三人締約過失責(zé)任規(guī)定于侵權(quán)法中,并應(yīng)將信賴原則也一并納入其中以統(tǒng)攝相關(guān)法律制度。
[Abstract]:The liability of the third party for contracting negligence is the liability of the third party who has not concluded the contract or the contract is invalid because of the mistake of the third party. The third party's fault in concluding the contract is a system developed in Germany through judicial jurisprudence. There is no such system in our country. In German law, the liability of the third party for fault in contract is solved by extending the scope of liability protection of the contract, and the civil law of our country is inextricably linked with Germany. The first part of this paper introduces the origin of the third party's fault liability in Germany. Germany has gradually developed the liability of the third party for fault in contracting through judicial jurisprudence. Through various cases, we have made clear the scope of the liability of the third party of the third party and the adjustment case type of the liability of the third party in Germany. The first part of the second part points out that the academic circles also object to the application of the third party's liability for fault in concluding the contract, and puts forward that the tort liability and the third party contract with protection can be completely applied. Then the author analyzes these views one by one, and points out that the liability of the third party in German law is fully applicable in our country. It can be classified as a special tort liability in the tort law of our country, and explains that its application in our country will bring positive significance in legislation, theory and practice. Through the analysis of the coordination between the third party's fault liability system and the third party's fraud, the performance of the assistant and the agent's liability, etc., the third party's fault liability system can be coordinated with the third party's fraud. This paper demonstrates the unique significance of the liability of the third party for fault in contracting in our country. When the civil code of our country has not been completed, the author thinks that this system can also be included in the current law. In the future civil code, the liability of the third party for contracting negligence should be stipulated in the tort law, and the principle of trust should also be included in it in order to dominate the relevant legal system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 陳協(xié)平;;我國專家侵權(quán)法律責(zé)任探究[J];山西農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年12期

2 李昊;;德國締約過失責(zé)任的成文化[J];清華法學(xué);2010年02期

3 馬新彥;;信賴原則在現(xiàn)代私法體系中的地位[J];法學(xué)研究;2009年03期

4 龍著華;;論侵權(quán)法保護(hù)的利益[J];法商研究;2007年04期

5 盧諶;杜景林;;論締約過失的基本問題及體系建構(gòu)[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

6 伍鑒萍;;論“附保護(hù)第三人作用的契約”[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2006年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1699518