發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-27 19:08

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 著作權(quán)執(zhí)法 信息披露 個(gè)人信息保護(hù) 網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境　出處：《中國政法大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：如何構(gòu)建網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)執(zhí)法中的信息披露制度,是有關(guān)著作權(quán)與個(gè)人信息權(quán)合理平衡的重要方面。從著作權(quán)法律體系來看,我國關(guān)于網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)執(zhí)法中的信息披露制度十分混亂;從個(gè)人信息法律體系來看,我國個(gè)人信息法尚未出臺,已經(jīng)頒布的有關(guān)個(gè)人信息保護(hù)的規(guī)定也難以與著作權(quán)執(zhí)法有效銜接。本文中,作者即以著作權(quán)執(zhí)法和個(gè)人信息保護(hù)的平衡為切入點(diǎn),對我國現(xiàn)行法律法規(guī)、司法解釋和典型案例做出詳細(xì)梳理,借鑒歐盟現(xiàn)有經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出適合我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)執(zhí)法中信息披露制度構(gòu)建的設(shè)想,以期為我國執(zhí)法機(jī)關(guān)執(zhí)法和學(xué)者研究提供參考。本文共分五章,體例安排如下:第一章涉及本文研究的范疇和前提。“著作權(quán)執(zhí)法”和“個(gè)人信息”是支撐本文寫作的兩大基本概念,很長時(shí)間以來,我國學(xué)者對于這兩個(gè)概念的基本含義還沒有充分的認(rèn)識,因此,廓清這兩個(gè)概念至關(guān)重要。另外,著作權(quán)執(zhí)法與個(gè)人信息保護(hù)需要在同一個(gè)維度下進(jìn)行解讀,如果不在一個(gè)層面上,二者就不存在對等沖突,也就沒有討論的必要。因此,在人權(quán)法的層面上闡釋二者的歷史演進(jìn)和基本關(guān)系成為本文寫作的前提。第二章探討的是構(gòu)建著作權(quán)執(zhí)法與個(gè)人信息保護(hù)平衡機(jī)制的國際法淵源和理論基礎(chǔ)。網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中的著作權(quán)執(zhí)法與個(gè)人信息保護(hù)相平衡的態(tài)度是國際條約的基本體現(xiàn),因此我國構(gòu)建合理平衡的網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)執(zhí)法中的信息披露制度是對國際條約的具體履行。另外,這種制度的建立也符合利益平衡理論和法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的基本思想,具有堅(jiān)實(shí)的理論基礎(chǔ)。第三章中作者將著眼于我國的現(xiàn)有制度,對我國現(xiàn)階段網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)執(zhí)法中的信息披露制度予以介紹和分析�？梢哉f,對信息披露制度重建的需求也是我國現(xiàn)實(shí)情況決定的。第四章是對歐洲現(xiàn)有制度的介紹,這也是本文對于現(xiàn)階段國內(nèi)相關(guān)研究的重要貢獻(xiàn)。國內(nèi)有關(guān)著作權(quán)執(zhí)法與個(gè)人信息保護(hù)關(guān)系的著述多停留在強(qiáng)調(diào)執(zhí)法效率的層面,對于著作權(quán)執(zhí)法過程中合理平衡的問題鮮有關(guān)注。本章中,作者將從歐盟和歐盟各成員國兩個(gè)層面對平衡問題加以論述,以期將歐盟在這一問題上的基本立場、路線選擇、根本分歧等內(nèi)容完整的展現(xiàn)出來。第五章構(gòu)成本文的結(jié)論,作者結(jié)合之前的分析,提出了一種“通知-移除-披露-懲罰”模式,期望給我國今后在這一問題上的理論研究和司法實(shí)踐提供參考。
[Abstract]:The information disclosure system of how to construct the network copyright law, is an important aspect of the copyright and the right of personal information and reasonable balance. From the legal system of copyright, our country about network copyright law enforcement information disclosure system is in chaos; from the legal system of personal information, personal information law in China has not yet introduced. Has promulgated the regulations for the protection of personal information is difficult and the copyright law enforcement effectively. In this paper, the author by the copyright law enforcement and protection of personal information of balance as the starting point, to China's current laws and regulations, judicial interpretation and case make a detailed analysis, from the existing EU experience, put forward the system construction the information disclosure of our network copyright law enforcement, in order to provide reference for China's law enforcement agencies and scholars. This paper is divided into five chapters, as follows: the first chapter deals with the style The category and the premise of the study. "Copyright law" and "personal information" is the two basic concepts of supporting the writing, for a long time, the basic meaning of Chinese scholars for these two concepts have not been fully understood, therefore, these two concepts are very important. In addition, copyright law enforcement and protection of personal information needs to be interpreted in the same dimension, if not in a level two, there is no peer conflict, there is no need to discuss. Therefore, the historical evolution and the basic relationship in human rights law interpretation of the two become the premise of this paper. The second chapter discussion on the international law origin and theoretical basis of constructing the copyright law enforcement and protection of personal information in the network environment. The balance mechanism of copyright law and the protection of personal information of phase equilibrium attitude is the basic embodiment of the international treaties, therefore our country. To build a reasonable balance of network copyright law enforcement information disclosure system is the specific performance of international treaties. In addition, the establishment of this system is also in line with the basic idea of the theory of balance of interests and law and economics, has a solid theoretical foundation. The existing system in the third chapter, author will focus on China, to be introduced and analyzed at the present stage of our country network copyright law enforcement information disclosure system. It can be said that China is the reality of the demand of information disclosure system determines the reconstruction. The fourth chapter is on the existing European system is introduced, which is the present domestic research works. An important contribution to relevant domestic copyright law enforcement and personal information stay in that relationship of the protection of law enforcement efficiency level, for the problem of little attention in the process of law enforcement of copyright balance. In this chapter, the author will from the EU and EU member In two aspects of equilibrium problems are discussed, in order to the basic position on the issue of the route selection, etc. the fundamental differences in the complete content of the show. The fifth chapter consists of the conclusion of the thesis, the author combined with the previous analysis, put forward a kind of "notice - remove disclosure and punishment" mode, expectation provide reference to our future on this issue of the theoretical research and judicial practice.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 梁志文;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商之信息披露義務(wù)——以我國著作權(quán)法制為中心的批判性解讀[J];北方法學(xué);2007年03期

2 蔣舸;;個(gè)人信息保護(hù)法立法模式的選擇——以德國經(jīng)驗(yàn)為視角[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2011年02期

3 王遷;;《信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護(hù)條例》中“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則的效力[J];法學(xué);2010年06期

4 牛強(qiáng);;變動的注意義務(wù):視頻分享網(wǎng)站過失評判的新范式[J];法治研究;2010年01期

5 李穎;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商信息披露義務(wù)與個(gè)人數(shù)據(jù)信息保護(hù)的平衡與博弈[J];法律適用;2013年08期

6 司曉;范露瓊;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域“通知—?jiǎng)h除”規(guī)則濫用的法律規(guī)制[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年Z1期

7 齊愛民;中華人民共和國個(gè)人信息保護(hù)法示范法草案學(xué)者建議稿[J];河北法學(xué);2005年06期

8 魯曉明;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件中網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的信息披露義務(wù)[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2010年03期

9 梁志文;;論ISP信息披露義務(wù)與著作權(quán)法公共政策[J];華僑大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2008年04期

10 馮曉青;著作權(quán)法目的與利益平衡論[J];科技與法律;2004年02期

，

本文編號：1543945