發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-01 15:24

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 機(jī)器寫(xiě)手 作品 著作權(quán)歸屬 侵權(quán)責(zé)任　出處：《湘潭大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著科學(xué)技術(shù)的發(fā)展,人類從繁重的體力與腦力勞動(dòng)中得以解放出來(lái),其中機(jī)器寫(xiě)手將人類從某些領(lǐng)域的腦力勞動(dòng)中解放出來(lái)。機(jī)器寫(xiě)手目前主要應(yīng)用在文學(xué)領(lǐng)域、藝術(shù)領(lǐng)域。隨著機(jī)器寫(xiě)手在越來(lái)越多的領(lǐng)域內(nèi)頻繁“上崗”,對(duì)機(jī)器寫(xiě)手及其創(chuàng)作成果進(jìn)行研究實(shí)屬必要。機(jī)器寫(xiě)手創(chuàng)作成果的相關(guān)著作權(quán)問(wèn)題中,首要問(wèn)題當(dāng)屬機(jī)器寫(xiě)手的創(chuàng)作成果是否為受著作權(quán)法保護(hù)的作品。根據(jù)機(jī)器寫(xiě)手的工作模式,機(jī)器寫(xiě)手創(chuàng)作成果可分成不受《著作權(quán)法》保護(hù)的成果和受《著作權(quán)法》所保護(hù)的作品這兩類:機(jī)器寫(xiě)手獨(dú)立進(jìn)行創(chuàng)作不能產(chǎn)生受《著作權(quán)法》所保護(hù)的作品,只有人參與創(chuàng)作的過(guò)程才能產(chǎn)生受《著作權(quán)法》保護(hù)的作品。其創(chuàng)作構(gòu)成受《著作權(quán)法》保護(hù)的作品時(shí),機(jī)器寫(xiě)手往往僅在其中起輔助作用。機(jī)器寫(xiě)手不能作為法律上的主體,其參與創(chuàng)作的受著作權(quán)法保護(hù)的作品的權(quán)利歸屬,當(dāng)屬于參與創(chuàng)作的人——軟件使用者或軟件開(kāi)發(fā)者,這兩類主體對(duì)作品創(chuàng)作的貢獻(xiàn)不等,結(jié)合機(jī)器寫(xiě)手的具體應(yīng)用,可知軟件使用者對(duì)作品創(chuàng)作做出的貢獻(xiàn)要比軟件開(kāi)發(fā)者大,且依據(jù)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度的利益平衡原則,軟件使用者的利益更需要保護(hù),因此機(jī)器寫(xiě)手創(chuàng)作的作品,其著作權(quán)歸屬于軟件使用者更為適合。根據(jù)機(jī)器寫(xiě)手的工作模式,其所具有的抓取能力是有侵權(quán)可能性的。機(jī)器寫(xiě)手既有可能侵犯著作財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)也有可能侵犯著作人身權(quán)。機(jī)器寫(xiě)手在創(chuàng)作中所起到的作用,決定了其侵權(quán)責(zé)任的承擔(dān):如果機(jī)器寫(xiě)手獨(dú)立創(chuàng)作的成果侵權(quán),軟件開(kāi)發(fā)者責(zé)無(wú)旁貸。從機(jī)器寫(xiě)手的功能來(lái)看,如果機(jī)器寫(xiě)手只有單純的侵權(quán)功能,那么軟件開(kāi)發(fā)者承擔(dān)間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任,軟件使用者承擔(dān)直接侵權(quán)責(zé)任;如果機(jī)器寫(xiě)手并非只有單一的侵權(quán)功能,軟件開(kāi)發(fā)者可以以技術(shù)中立原則免責(zé),而軟件使用者需要承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任。
[Abstract]:With the development of science and technology, human beings have been liberated from heavy physical and mental labor. Machine writers liberate human beings from some fields of mental labor. Machine writers are mainly used in the field of literature and art. With the increasing number of machine writers in more and more fields of "work". It is necessary to study the machine writers and their creative achievements. The first question is whether the product of the machine writer is a work protected by copyright law. According to the working mode of the machine writer. The achievements of machine writers can be divided into two categories: the works which are not protected by the copyright Law and the works which are protected by the copyright Law: the machine writers can not produce the works protected by the copyright Law by themselves. Only people participate in the process of creation can produce the works protected by the copyright Law, and when their creation constitutes the works protected by the copyright Law. Machine writers often only play an auxiliary role. Machine writers can not be the subject of law, and their rights to participate in the creation of works protected by copyright law belong. When the person involved in the creation-software users or software developers, these two main contributions to the creation of works vary, combined with the specific application of machine writers. We know that software users make a greater contribution to the creation of works than software developers, and according to the interests of the intellectual property system balance principle, the interests of software users need more protection, so machine writers create works. Its copyright belongs to the software user more suitable. According to the machine writer's work mode. The grabbing ability has the possibility of infringement. The machine writer has both the possibility to infringe the property right and the personal right of the work. The role of the machine writer in the creation. Decided its tort liability: if the machine writer independent creation of the product infringement, the software developer is duty-bound. From the machine writer's function, if the machine writer only has the infringing function. Then the software developer bears the indirect tort liability, the software user bears the direct tort liability; If the machine writer does not have a single infringing function, the software developer can be exempted from liability under the principle of technology neutrality, and the software user is liable for the infringement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 熊琦;;人工智能生成內(nèi)容的著作權(quán)認(rèn)定[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2017年03期

2 鄧建國(guó);;機(jī)器人新聞:原理、風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和影響[J];新聞?dòng)浾?2016年09期

3 曹源;;人工智能創(chuàng)作物獲得版權(quán)保護(hù)的合理性[J];科技與法律;2016年03期

4 張玲;王果;;動(dòng)物“創(chuàng)作成果”的民事法律關(guān)系三要素分析[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年02期

5 柯曉蕾;;非自然人作品著作權(quán)歸屬問(wèn)題研究[J];雞西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2014年04期

6 陳杰;;論著作權(quán)法視野下的作品觀[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2012年06期

7 趙銳;;作品獨(dú)創(chuàng)性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的反思與認(rèn)知[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年09期

8 曹新明;;我國(guó)著作權(quán)歸屬模式的立法完善[J];法學(xué);2011年06期

9 王坤;;作品概念的科學(xué)建構(gòu)及其在著作權(quán)法上的意義[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年06期

10 何晶;周明;蔣龍;;基于統(tǒng)計(jì)的漢語(yǔ)格律詩(shī)生成研究[J];中文信息學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1482183