本文選題：開除公職 + 退休待遇��； 參考：《四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版)》2017年05期

【摘要】：在退休金制度下,我國公職人員在職時無需繳納養(yǎng)老保險費,正常退休時享受國家提供的退休金。因違法違紀(jì)被開除公職后其在公共部分累積的工齡被清除,即將退休或者已經(jīng)退休的,不得再享受退休待遇。由懲戒機關(guān)在法律之外處分公職人員的退休金權(quán)利,不僅違反了憲法關(guān)于公民權(quán)利保障原則,破壞了懲戒法定原則,而且直接威脅到被開除者的老年生存。從本質(zhì)上看,公職人員的退休金包含了其基本養(yǎng)老保險待遇和國家支付的退休福利,前者屬于公民維持生存的財產(chǎn)權(quán)利,后者屬于單位提供的退休福利。對此應(yīng)當(dāng)區(qū)別對待,公民維持生存的財產(chǎn)權(quán)依現(xiàn)行法律不得剝奪或者限制;退休福利在公職人員違法違紀(jì)時應(yīng)予以收回,但應(yīng)遵循法律保留原則。
[Abstract]:Under the pension system, public officials in our country do not have to pay for the pension insurance in service and enjoy the retirement pension provided by the state when they retire normally. The work age accumulated in the public part of the public sector has been cleared because of the violation of the law and discipline. The pension right of public officials not only violates the principle of the constitutional protection of civil rights, destroys the principle of disciplinary law, but also threatens the elderly survival of the expulsion. In essence, the retirement pension of public officials includes its basic pension insurance treatment and the retirement benefits paid by the state, the former belongs to the maintenance of the citizens. The property right, the latter belongs to the retirement welfare provided by the unit. It should be treated differently. The property rights of the citizens shall not be deprived or restricted in accordance with the current law; the retirement benefits should be retracted when the public servants violate the law and discipline, but should follow the principle of legal retention.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金一般項目“經(jīng)濟社會轉(zhuǎn)型中的養(yǎng)老保險待遇調(diào)整法律問題研究”(17BFX133)
【分類號】：D922.1;D922.5

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 ;我能被開除公職嗎?[J];中國人力資源開發(fā);2001年01期

2 ;關(guān)于對職工因搶占住房能否開除公職問題的答復(fù)[J];勞動世界;1997年08期

3 陳旭晨;對倪某開除公職的處理是否正確[J];中國勞動;2003年10期

4 李文成;;國家干部犯罪后都要開除公職嗎?[J];中華魂;1996年03期

5 ;此宗爭議案應(yīng)由誰受理[J];勞動理論與實踐;2001年04期

6 代天虎;吳某能恢復(fù)公職確定科員職務(wù)嗎?[J];人才w，

本文編號：1956678