發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-30 16:29

  本文選題：董事離任義務(wù) + 后合同義務(wù)　； 參考：《上海交通大學(xué)》2007年碩士論文

【摘要】： 在現(xiàn)代公司制度中兩權(quán)分離的體制下,董事作為公司的管理人員,在管理公司期間掌握了任何其他人員所無法比擬的關(guān)于公司人力、財(cái)力、機(jī)會等各方面的信息和經(jīng)驗(yàn)。基于此,對董事義務(wù)進(jìn)行明確的規(guī)范顯得非常重要。從承擔(dān)的時(shí)間上對董事義務(wù)進(jìn)行劃分,可將其劃分為在任義務(wù)和離任義務(wù)。現(xiàn)在,對董事在任義務(wù)的研究很多,而對離任義務(wù)的研究則相對較少。隨著近年來董事違反離任義務(wù)案件的急劇增多,有必要給予董事離任義務(wù)更多的關(guān)注。 但是,現(xiàn)行有關(guān)公司方面的法律規(guī)定以及約束勞動者行為的勞動法均沒有明確董事離任義務(wù),以至在實(shí)踐中不能平衡離任董事與公司之間的利益關(guān)系。本文區(qū)分了幾種關(guān)于董事離任義務(wù)的理論學(xué)說,論證了運(yùn)用后合同義務(wù)理論解釋約束董事離任義務(wù)的必要性和可行性。并在后合同義務(wù)理論的框架內(nèi)論述了董事離任義務(wù)的特征,著重分析了董事離任后繼續(xù)承擔(dān)的商業(yè)秘密保密義務(wù)、競業(yè)禁止義務(wù)、自我交易義務(wù)的主要特點(diǎn)。最后吸收后合同義務(wù)理論所闡釋的董事離任義務(wù)品質(zhì),建議在《公司法》、《勞動法》、《勞動合同法》中有區(qū)別的加以完善規(guī)定。
[Abstract]:Under the system of separation of two powers in the modern company system, directors, as managers of the company, have grasped the information and experience on the human, financial and opportunity aspects of the company which can not be compared by any other personnel during the period of the management of the company. Based on this, it is very important to regulate the director's duty clearly. The obligations of directors can be divided into incumbent obligations and outgoing obligations. At present, there are a lot of researches on the present duty of directors, but less on the obligation of leaving office. With the rapid increase of directors' breach of duty, it is necessary to pay more attention to it. However, the current laws and regulations on the company and the labor law which restrict the labor behavior do not clearly define the obligation of the directors to leave office, so that the interest relationship between the outgoing directors and the company can not be balanced in practice. This paper distinguishes several theories about director's leaving duty, and proves the necessity and feasibility of applying post contract obligation theory to explain and restrict director's leaving obligation. In the framework of post-contractual obligation theory, this paper discusses the characteristics of directors' obligation to leave office, and emphatically analyzes the main characteristics of the duty of confidentiality of trade secrets, the obligation of prohibition of non-competition and the obligation of self-dealing which the directors continue to undertake after leaving their posts. Finally, it is suggested that the quality of directors' leaving duty, which is explained by the theory of post-contract obligation, should be improved differently in Company Law and Labor contract Law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 楊繼;公司董事“注意義務(wù)”與“忠實(shí)義務(wù)”辨[J];比較法研究;2003年03期

2 焦富民;后合同責(zé)任制度研究[J];河北法學(xué);2005年11期

3 張光順,賀少偉;董事離任義務(wù)的理論基礎(chǔ)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇;2004年11期

4 王爽;后合同責(zé)任相關(guān)問題探究[J];前沿;2004年05期

5 蔡立東;公司本質(zhì)論綱——公司法理論體系邏輯起點(diǎn)解讀[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2004年01期

6 楊立新;中國合同責(zé)任研究(上)[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年01期

7 張民安;董事的法律地位研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1998年02期

8 邱平榮，歐陽仁根;論對商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)的限制[J];政法論壇;1997年04期

，

本文編號：1955965