本文關(guān)鍵詞： 勞動人事爭議仲裁 銜接 裁審關(guān)系　出處：《政法論叢》2017年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：我國勞動人事爭議仲裁和訴訟存在實體和程序上的銜接不暢。要從根本上解決該問題,必須從正確定位勞動仲裁的性質(zhì)著手,并在此基礎(chǔ)上厘清勞動仲裁和訴訟銜接的實質(zhì):勞動仲裁和訴訟不是普通仲裁和訴訟的關(guān)系,而是勞動人事爭議專門機構(gòu)和普通法院的關(guān)系,應將勞動仲裁定位為司法性或準司法性,與此一致,裁審關(guān)系是特殊的一審和二審的關(guān)系。為此,需要重構(gòu)勞動人事爭議處理審級制度,取消和勞動仲裁性質(zhì)不相吻合的程序和制度,并賦予勞動仲裁機構(gòu)保全等強制性權(quán)力。
[Abstract]:The substantive and procedural connection between arbitration and litigation of labor and personnel disputes in China is not smooth. In order to solve this problem fundamentally, we must start with the correct orientation of the nature of labor arbitration. And on this basis to clarify the essence of labor arbitration and litigation convergence: Labor arbitration and litigation is not the relationship between ordinary arbitration and litigation, but the relationship between specialized agencies of labor and personnel disputes and ordinary courts. The labor arbitration should be defined as judicial or quasi-judicial. In accordance with this, the adjudication relationship is a special relationship between the first instance and the second instance. Therefore, it is necessary to reconstruct the system of handling labor personnel disputes. Cancel the procedure and system which are inconsistent with the nature of labor arbitration, and endow labor arbitration institution with compulsory power such as preservation.
【作者單位】： 溫州大學法政學院;
【基金】：浙江省溫州市社會科學規(guī)劃課題“勞動人事爭議仲裁民間化、社會化問題研究——基于溫州市甌海區(qū)勞動人事爭議仲裁委員會高教園區(qū)派出庭實踐的思考”(17WSK046)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D922.591
【正文快照】： 《中共中央國務院關(guān)于構(gòu)建和諧勞動關(guān)系的意見》提出,要加強裁審銜接與工作協(xié)調(diào),積極探索建立訴訟與仲裁程序有效銜接、裁審標準統(tǒng)一的新規(guī)則、新制度。2017年3月21日,人力資源和社會保障部等中央八部門聯(lián)合頒布《關(guān)于進一步加強勞動人事爭議調(diào)解仲裁完善多元處理機制的意見》

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙會元;淺談人事爭議產(chǎn)生的原因及對策[J];人才w，

本文編號：1462754