【摘要】：自從2008年我國反壟斷法頒布以來,反壟斷執(zhí)法機(jī)構(gòu)查處了一部分壟斷違法案件,但是壟斷行為在我國的境內(nèi),卻屢禁不止。在私人訴訟方面,雖然已經(jīng)存在許多私人主體走進(jìn)法院進(jìn)行訴訟的情形,但是仍然存在勝訴率過低,原告方舉證困難等情況。究其原因,這與我國相關(guān)法律制度不健全,反壟斷公共實(shí)施與反壟斷私人訴訟缺少相應(yīng)的互動(dòng)機(jī)制不無關(guān)系。為此,最高人民法院于2012年5月頒布了《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理因壟斷行為引發(fā)的民事糾紛案件應(yīng)用法律若干問題的規(guī)定》,這也意味著我國在未來的一段時(shí)間內(nèi)將進(jìn)一步完善反壟斷法的實(shí)施機(jī)制。以此為契機(jī),筆者認(rèn)為反壟斷法私人訴訟激勵(lì)法律機(jī)制是一個(gè)良好的切入點(diǎn),通過借鑒域外法律經(jīng)驗(yàn),討論各種制度的優(yōu)劣,力圖在我國建立完善的反壟斷法私人訴訟制度。這其中的核心是我們應(yīng)當(dāng)關(guān)注普通公民參與私人訴訟中的積極性,在實(shí)體或者程序上做出適當(dāng)?shù)母牧?激勵(lì)普通公民走進(jìn)法院,進(jìn)行反壟斷訴訟。完善反壟斷私人訴訟制度,首先在應(yīng)當(dāng)重視法律的激勵(lì)功能,使得普通公民更加愿意走進(jìn)法院,運(yùn)用反壟斷私人訴訟這來維護(hù)自己的合法權(quán)益;其次,要對(duì)舉證責(zé)任進(jìn)行合理分配或者設(shè)計(jì)相關(guān)的幫助制度,使得走進(jìn)法院的普通公民,對(duì)待壟斷企業(yè)這一龐然大物的時(shí)候,在訴訟中不喪失對(duì)抗的能力;最后,在我國確立反壟斷私人禁令訴訟,使得勝訴個(gè)人的合法權(quán)益得到有效的救濟(jì)和保障。
[Abstract]:Since the promulgation of the Anti-monopoly Law in 2008, anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies have investigated and dealt with some illegal monopoly cases. In the aspect of private litigation, although there have been many cases of private subjects entering the court for litigation, there are still cases such as the low rate of success and the difficulty of proving evidence by the plaintiff. The reason is that our country's relevant legal system is not perfect, the antitrust public implementation and the antimonopoly private lawsuit lack the corresponding interactive mechanism. To that end, In May 2012, the Supreme people's Court promulgated the provisions of the Supreme people's Court on the Application of Law in handling cases of Civil disputes caused by Monopoly, which also means that China will move forward in the future. Steps to improve the implementation mechanism of the anti-monopoly law. Taking this as an opportunity, the author thinks that the private litigation incentive legal mechanism of anti-monopoly law is a good starting point. Through reference to the extraterritorial legal experience, the author discusses the merits and demerits of various systems, and tries to establish a perfect private litigation system of anti-monopoly law in China. The core of this is that we should pay attention to the enthusiasm of ordinary citizens to participate in private litigation, make appropriate improvement in entity or procedure, and encourage ordinary citizens to enter the court and carry out antitrust litigation. To improve the system of private antitrust litigation, we should first attach importance to the incentive function of the law so that ordinary citizens are more willing to enter the court and use private antitrust litigation to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests; secondly, The burden of proof should be reasonably distributed or the relevant help system should be designed so that ordinary citizens who enter the court will not lose their ability to fight in the proceedings when they treat the monopoly as a giant; finally, The establishment of anti-monopoly private injunction in our country makes the legal rights and interests of successful individuals effective relief and protection.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 丁國峰;;反壟斷法私人實(shí)施的法理基礎(chǔ)和具體路徑[J];華北電力大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年02期

2 王先林;;論反壟斷民事訴訟與行政執(zhí)法的銜接與協(xié)調(diào)[J];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

3 李劍;;反壟斷法中核心設(shè)施的界定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)——相關(guān)市場(chǎng)的視角[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2009年03期

4 王健;;反壟斷法私人執(zhí)行的優(yōu)越性及其實(shí)現(xiàn)——兼論中國反壟斷法引入私人執(zhí)行制度的必要性和立法建議[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2007年04期

5 劉桂清;;反壟斷法實(shí)施中的幾個(gè)重大關(guān)系析[J];政法論叢;2007年03期

6 鄭鵬程;;美國反壟斷法三倍損害賠償制度研究[J];環(huán)球法律評(píng)論;2006年02期

7 王健;;威懾理念下的反壟斷法刑事制裁制度——兼評(píng)《中華人民共和國反壟斷法(修改稿)》的相關(guān)規(guī)定[J];法商研究;2006年01期

8 柳學(xué)信;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)產(chǎn)業(yè)接入定價(jià)與互聯(lián)互通管制——對(duì)我國電信業(yè)互聯(lián)互通問題的分析[J];中國軟科學(xué);2004年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 萬宗瓚;反壟斷私人訴訟制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 張力;反壟斷法私人實(shí)施制度研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2013年

2 胡曉頤;反壟斷法民事責(zé)任制度研究[D];山西大學(xué);2012年

3 王Z，

本文編號(hào)：2285018