供給側(cè)改革視野下行政壟斷規(guī)制路徑新探
發(fā)布時間：2018-09-14 07:08
【摘要】：我國有著權(quán)力干預(yù)經(jīng)濟(jì)的悠久歷史傳統(tǒng),在這一肥沃的土壤上,行政壟斷現(xiàn)象層出不窮,對公平競爭市場造成了嚴(yán)重的損害。盡管行政壟斷早已納入《反壟斷法》的規(guī)制,但是其治理效果不盡人意,面臨著巨大的制度困境。我國在行政壟斷治理路徑的選擇上采取了行政體制內(nèi)部進(jìn)行糾正的路徑,在“規(guī)則之治”異化的情形之下,此路徑難以承擔(dān)治理行政壟斷的重任。在供給側(cè)改革的時代背景下,破除行政壟斷儼然是勢在必行,同時行政壟斷也迎來了有史以來最佳的規(guī)制環(huán)境,但是卻面臨著巨大的制度障礙。如何抓住行政壟斷治理的新契機(jī),構(gòu)建普遍適用的規(guī)制路徑體系,從而突圍行政壟斷治理的困境,是本文要解決的核心問題。第一章,透視供給側(cè)改革反思我國行政壟斷規(guī)制的必要性。不同于西方國家所倡導(dǎo)的供給管理,在我國特殊語境下供給側(cè)改革有其獨(dú)特的內(nèi)涵,其實(shí)質(zhì)在于強(qiáng)調(diào)政府在有效供給形成和結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化方面的積極作用,或者可以進(jìn)一步說本輪經(jīng)濟(jì)改革是對政府以往干預(yù)市場行為的修正,核心在于處理好政府與市場之間的關(guān)系。在這基本內(nèi)涵的指引下,行政壟斷的治理便成為供給側(cè)改革中的重要內(nèi)容,透視供給側(cè)改革反思我國行政壟斷規(guī)制也就具有顯著的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。簡而言之,不管是基于現(xiàn)實(shí)角度或理論邏輯角度去考量,破除行政壟斷在全面推進(jìn)供給側(cè)改革中占據(jù)著重要地位。第二章,供給側(cè)改革視野下我國規(guī)制行政壟斷的制度困境。立足于我國目前行政壟規(guī)制現(xiàn)狀來看,其治理效果是不盡人意的。首先政府在行政壟斷治理中存在嚴(yán)重的角色越位。傳統(tǒng)權(quán)貴經(jīng)濟(jì)文化與“官本位”思想使得我國長期以來缺乏競爭文化,再加上政府多重角色的混同,讓政府常常脫離本位。其次競爭合規(guī)審查在行政壟斷治理中存在缺位。當(dāng)下我國正如火如荼地展開公平競爭審查制度的建設(shè),但是從《意見》的出臺到制度的落實(shí),還需要當(dāng)局更大的決心與毅力。最后我國《反壟斷法》在規(guī)制行政壟斷上存在錯位。規(guī)制范圍的局限、規(guī)制責(zé)任的無力以及競爭執(zhí)法的弱化使得《反壟斷法》在規(guī)制行政壟斷上顯得力不從心,難以承擔(dān)反行政壟斷之重任。第三章,供給側(cè)改革視野下行政壟斷規(guī)制路徑的選擇。在供給側(cè)改革視野下突圍行政壟斷治理的困境,最為核心的便是要尋求一條合理的規(guī)制路徑。在現(xiàn)行法律規(guī)制框架下我國行政壟斷規(guī)制路徑是一條依賴行政體制內(nèi)部進(jìn)行糾正的封閉式路徑,缺乏系統(tǒng)性的全面聯(lián)動規(guī)制路徑體系。借鑒轉(zhuǎn)軌經(jīng)濟(jì)國家和發(fā)達(dá)國家關(guān)于行政壟斷治理路徑選擇的實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn),我國行政壟斷規(guī)制路徑的選擇應(yīng)當(dāng)立足于本土資源,借著供給側(cè)改革的新契機(jī),尋求全面聯(lián)動的規(guī)制路徑。第四章,供給側(cè)改革視野下行政壟斷規(guī)制的路徑展開與制度創(chuàng)新。從理念出發(fā)深入到行政壟斷治理的各個環(huán)節(jié),本文構(gòu)建了由規(guī)制基礎(chǔ)路徑——規(guī)制前置路徑——規(guī)制事前路徑——規(guī)制事后路徑組成的全面聯(lián)動型規(guī)制路徑體系。在供給側(cè)改革的視野下,進(jìn)一步探求各個路徑的展開邏輯。規(guī)制基礎(chǔ)路徑——政府與市場之角色重塑是行政壟斷治理的旗幟,明確了治理路徑的方向與定位。規(guī)制前置路徑——公平競爭審查之落實(shí)為破除行政壟斷打前站,將行政壟斷現(xiàn)象扼殺在搖籃中。規(guī)制事前路徑——實(shí)體立法之完善是行政壟斷治理的中心環(huán)節(jié),是將行政壟斷治理納入法治軌道的基礎(chǔ)。規(guī)制事后路徑——競爭執(zhí)法之常態(tài)化是行政壟斷治理的事后救濟(jì)機(jī)制,是最后一道市場競爭的保護(hù)屏障。
[Abstract]:China has a long historical tradition of power intervention in the economy. In this fertile soil, administrative monopoly emerges one after another, causing serious damage to the fair competition market. In the context of the supply-side reform, it is imperative to break the administrative monopoly, and at the same time, the administrative monopoly has ushered in the best regulation ever. How to seize the new opportunity of administrative monopoly governance and build a generally applicable regulatory path system to break through the predicament of administrative monopoly governance is the core problem to be solved in this paper. The supply-side reform advocated by the government has its unique connotation in the special context of our country. Its essence lies in emphasizing the positive role of the government in the formation of effective supply and the optimization of the structure. Or it can be further said that this round of economic reform is a revision of the government's past intervention in the market, and the core is to handle the government and the market well. Under the guidance of this basic connotation, the governance of administrative monopoly has become an important part of the supply-side reform. It is of great practical significance to reflect on the regulation of administrative monopoly through the supply-side reform. In the second chapter, the institutional dilemma of regulation of administrative monopoly under the perspective of supply-side reform is discussed. Based on the present situation of administrative ridge regulation in China, the governance effect is unsatisfactory. Firstly, the government has a serious role offside in the administration of administrative monopoly. The idea of "position" has made our country lack of competitive culture for a long time, coupled with the confusion of multiple roles of the government, so that the government often breaks away from the standard. Finally, there is a dislocation in the regulation of administrative monopoly in China's Anti-monopoly Law. The limitation of regulation scope, the inability of regulation responsibility and the weakening of competition enforcement make the Anti-monopoly Law seem unable to regulate administrative monopoly and bear the heavy responsibility of anti-administrative monopoly. The most important thing is to find a reasonable regulation path under the perspective of supply-side reform. Under the current legal framework, the regulation path of administrative monopoly in China is a closed path which relies on the internal correction of the administrative system and lacks systematicness. Referring to the practical experience of the transition economy countries and developed countries on the choice of administrative monopoly governance path, the choice of administrative monopoly regulation path in China should be based on local resources, taking advantage of the new opportunity of supply-side reform, to seek a comprehensive linkage regulation path. Chapter IV, from the perspective of supply-side reform. From the concept to the various links of administrative monopoly governance, this paper constructs a comprehensive linkage regulation path system consisting of the basic regulation path-the pre-regulation path-the pre-regulation path-the pre-regulation path-the pre-regulation path-the Post-regulation path. The basic path of regulation - the role remodeling of government and market is the banner of administrative monopoly governance, and the orientation and orientation of the governance path are clarified. The perfection of substantive legislation is the central link of administrative monopoly governance and the basis of bringing administrative monopoly governance into the orbit of rule of law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南財經(jīng)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.294
本文編號：2241942
[Abstract]:China has a long historical tradition of power intervention in the economy. In this fertile soil, administrative monopoly emerges one after another, causing serious damage to the fair competition market. In the context of the supply-side reform, it is imperative to break the administrative monopoly, and at the same time, the administrative monopoly has ushered in the best regulation ever. How to seize the new opportunity of administrative monopoly governance and build a generally applicable regulatory path system to break through the predicament of administrative monopoly governance is the core problem to be solved in this paper. The supply-side reform advocated by the government has its unique connotation in the special context of our country. Its essence lies in emphasizing the positive role of the government in the formation of effective supply and the optimization of the structure. Or it can be further said that this round of economic reform is a revision of the government's past intervention in the market, and the core is to handle the government and the market well. Under the guidance of this basic connotation, the governance of administrative monopoly has become an important part of the supply-side reform. It is of great practical significance to reflect on the regulation of administrative monopoly through the supply-side reform. In the second chapter, the institutional dilemma of regulation of administrative monopoly under the perspective of supply-side reform is discussed. Based on the present situation of administrative ridge regulation in China, the governance effect is unsatisfactory. Firstly, the government has a serious role offside in the administration of administrative monopoly. The idea of "position" has made our country lack of competitive culture for a long time, coupled with the confusion of multiple roles of the government, so that the government often breaks away from the standard. Finally, there is a dislocation in the regulation of administrative monopoly in China's Anti-monopoly Law. The limitation of regulation scope, the inability of regulation responsibility and the weakening of competition enforcement make the Anti-monopoly Law seem unable to regulate administrative monopoly and bear the heavy responsibility of anti-administrative monopoly. The most important thing is to find a reasonable regulation path under the perspective of supply-side reform. Under the current legal framework, the regulation path of administrative monopoly in China is a closed path which relies on the internal correction of the administrative system and lacks systematicness. Referring to the practical experience of the transition economy countries and developed countries on the choice of administrative monopoly governance path, the choice of administrative monopoly regulation path in China should be based on local resources, taking advantage of the new opportunity of supply-side reform, to seek a comprehensive linkage regulation path. Chapter IV, from the perspective of supply-side reform. From the concept to the various links of administrative monopoly governance, this paper constructs a comprehensive linkage regulation path system consisting of the basic regulation path-the pre-regulation path-the pre-regulation path-the pre-regulation path-the pre-regulation path-the Post-regulation path. The basic path of regulation - the role remodeling of government and market is the banner of administrative monopoly governance, and the orientation and orientation of the governance path are clarified. The perfection of substantive legislation is the central link of administrative monopoly governance and the basis of bringing administrative monopoly governance into the orbit of rule of law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南財經(jīng)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.294
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳惟杉;孫冰;宋杰;;網(wǎng)約車,向何方?[J];中國經(jīng)濟(jì)周刊;2016年41期
2 侯璐;;我國公平競爭審查機(jī)制的構(gòu)建及其完善[J];價格理論與實(shí)踐;2016年07期
3 黃南;;供給側(cè)結(jié)構(gòu)性改革與中國市場競爭機(jī)制的完善——兼論對行政性壟斷的規(guī)避[J];南京社會科學(xué);2016年07期
4 羅勁博;;高管的“紅頂商人”身份與公司商業(yè)信用[J];上海財經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2016年03期
5 李小明;羅成忠;;俄羅斯行政壟斷規(guī)制問題比較研究[J];財經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2016年03期
6 文建東;宋斌;;供給側(cè)結(jié)構(gòu)性改革:經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的必然選擇[J];新疆師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2016年02期
7 丁茂中;;產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的競爭評估研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2016年03期
8 黃勇;;供給側(cè)結(jié)構(gòu)性改革中的競爭政策[J];價格理論與實(shí)踐;2016年01期
9 紀(jì)念改革開放40周年系列選題研究中心;王佳寧;盛朝迅;;重點(diǎn)領(lǐng)域改革節(jié)點(diǎn)研判:供給側(cè)與需求側(cè)[J];改革;2016年01期
10 戴險峰;;供給學(xué)派的起源與美國實(shí)踐[J];中國金融;2016年01期
，本文編號：2241942
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2241942.html
最近更新
教材專著
