【摘要】：PPP是Public-Private Partnership的英文縮寫,中文譯為“公共部門與私營(yíng)部門的合作伙伴關(guān)系”。它以PPP協(xié)議約束公私雙方的權(quán)利義務(wù),在利益共享、風(fēng)險(xiǎn)共擔(dān)基礎(chǔ)上形成合作關(guān)系,旨在為公眾更好地提供公共服務(wù)。目前,由于PPP法律制度層級(jí)較低,不同規(guī)范之間存在重復(fù)和矛盾之處,公共部門與私營(yíng)部門在訂立PPP協(xié)議時(shí)權(quán)利義務(wù)分配不明確,公共部門權(quán)力界限不清等原因,導(dǎo)致PPP模式在我國(guó)的應(yīng)用中產(chǎn)生諸多問題,如公共部門與私營(yíng)部門的權(quán)益沖突問題,PPP協(xié)議性質(zhì)問題,風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分擔(dān)問題等,其中,公共部門與私營(yíng)部門的權(quán)益沖突問題是影響公私合作法律關(guān)系的核心問題。公私雙方之間的權(quán)益沖突輕則影響具體項(xiàng)目合作中公私雙方權(quán)利義務(wù)配置,不利于公私雙方的良性合作,嚴(yán)重時(shí)影響公共物品的穩(wěn)定提供,損害公共利益。因此對(duì)PPP模式中公共部門與私營(yíng)部門之間的權(quán)益沖突進(jìn)行有效協(xié)調(diào)至關(guān)重要。本文通過運(yùn)用實(shí)證研究法、比較分析法和文獻(xiàn)研究法,對(duì)如何調(diào)整公私權(quán)益沖突進(jìn)行研究。通過梳理公共部門與私營(yíng)部門權(quán)利義務(wù)配置現(xiàn)狀,得出公私雙方權(quán)益沖突的表現(xiàn)及原因。由于權(quán)利義務(wù)配置不平等,公私雙方根本目標(biāo)不一致以及在PPP模式中公共部門承擔(dān)多重角色等原因,導(dǎo)致公私雙方產(chǎn)生社會(huì)公共利益最大化與私人資本利益最大化之間的沖突,公權(quán)力與私權(quán)利之間的沖突,公共利益與壟斷利益之間的沖突等。英國(guó)、加拿大等國(guó)家PPP模式的運(yùn)用發(fā)展較為成熟,通過分析英國(guó)、加拿大、臺(tái)灣地區(qū)關(guān)于PPP模式中公私權(quán)益調(diào)整的有效做法,結(jié)合我國(guó)實(shí)際情況,得出一些可借鑒的措施,包括完善法律法規(guī)體系,確定專門的主管機(jī)關(guān)及明確其職權(quán)等。這些措施將為協(xié)調(diào)PPP模式中公私雙方的權(quán)益沖突提供理論指導(dǎo)。明確PPP協(xié)議的法律屬性,將為協(xié)調(diào)公私雙方的權(quán)益沖突提供理論出發(fā)點(diǎn)。本文以PPP協(xié)議是具有經(jīng)濟(jì)法屬性的合同為基點(diǎn),以經(jīng)濟(jì)法理念調(diào)整公私雙方的權(quán)益沖突,即確立以公共利益的保護(hù)為核心、兼顧私人權(quán)益的協(xié)調(diào)理念,通過具體措施做到既保障公共利益的實(shí)現(xiàn),又使私營(yíng)部門的合法權(quán)益得到尊重與保護(hù),合理配置公私雙方的權(quán)利義務(wù),從而保證PPP模式的穩(wěn)定發(fā)展。將經(jīng)濟(jì)法理念應(yīng)用于PPP模式中,協(xié)調(diào)公共部門與私營(yíng)部門之間權(quán)益沖突,體現(xiàn)了經(jīng)濟(jì)法對(duì)公私合作各方不同價(jià)值目標(biāo)的包容和尊重,實(shí)現(xiàn)了社會(huì)公共利益最優(yōu)化的整體目標(biāo)與私人資本最大化的個(gè)體目標(biāo)的統(tǒng)一,有助于PPP模式的法學(xué)理論的完善。
[Abstract]:PPP is an acronym for Public-Private Partnership. It binds the rights and obligations of both public and private parties by PPP agreement and forms a cooperative relationship on the basis of benefit-sharing and risk-sharing in order to provide better public services for the public. At present, due to the low level of PPP legal system, duplication and contradiction among different norms, the distribution of rights and obligations between the public sector and the private sector in concluding the PPP agreement is not clear, and the limits of the power of the public sector are not clear. It leads to many problems in the application of PPP model in our country, such as the conflict of rights and interests between the public and private sectors, the nature of PPP agreement, the problem of risk sharing and so on. The conflict of rights and interests between the public and private sectors is the core issue affecting the legal relationship between the public and private sectors. The light conflict of rights and interests between public and private affects the allocation of rights and obligations of both public and private parties in specific project cooperation, which is not conducive to the benign cooperation between public and private parties, and seriously affects the stable supply of public goods and damages the public interests. Therefore, it is very important to coordinate the conflicts between public and private sectors in PPP mode. This paper studies how to adjust the conflict between public and private interests by means of empirical research, comparative analysis and literature research. Through combing the present situation of the allocation of rights and obligations between the public sector and the private sector, this paper concludes the manifestation and causes of the conflict between public and private interests. Due to the unequal allocation of rights and obligations, the inconsistency of the fundamental goals of both public and private parties and the multiple roles of the public sector in the PPP model, there is a conflict between the maximization of social public interests and the maximization of the interests of private capital. The conflict between public power and private right, the conflict between public interest and monopoly interest, etc. The application and development of PPP model in Britain, Canada and other countries are relatively mature. By analyzing the effective methods of adjusting the public and private rights and interests in the PPP model in the UK, Canada and Taiwan, and combining the actual situation of our country, we can draw some measures that can be used for reference. Including perfecting the system of laws and regulations, defining special competent authorities and clarifying their functions and powers. These measures will provide theoretical guidance for coordinating the conflict of interests between public and private parties in the PPP model. Clarifying the legal attribute of PPP agreement will provide a theoretical starting point for coordinating the conflict of rights and interests between public and private parties. Based on the fact that the PPP agreement is a contract with the attribute of economic law, this paper adjusts the conflict of rights and interests between public and private parties with the idea of economic law, that is, to establish the coordination idea of taking the protection of public interest as the core and taking account of private rights and interests. Through concrete measures, we can not only guarantee the realization of public interests, but also respect and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the private sector, and reasonably allocate the rights and obligations of both public and private parties, so as to ensure the stable development of the PPP model. The concept of economic law is applied to the PPP model to coordinate the conflict of rights and interests between the public sector and the private sector, which embodies the tolerance and respect of the different value objectives of the public and private parties. It realizes the unity of the overall goal of the optimization of social public interest and the individual goal of maximizing the private capital, which is helpful to the perfection of the legal theory of the PPP model.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.29

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉桂清,佘勝勇;論經(jīng)濟(jì)法基本原則[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2000年05期

2 楊志祥;對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)法概念及調(diào)整對(duì)象的再認(rèn)識(shí)[J];鄂州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期

3 劉易,許勝利;《經(jīng)濟(jì)法理論與實(shí)務(wù)》簡(jiǎn)介[J];金陵職業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期

4 艾遠(yuǎn)鳳;;論經(jīng)濟(jì)法的調(diào)整對(duì)象[J];四川省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年04期

5 陳云良;經(jīng)濟(jì)法應(yīng)當(dāng)有所作為:論經(jīng)濟(jì)法的任務(wù)[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

6 王斌;;經(jīng)濟(jì)法的地位再探[J];四川省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期

7 張永清;經(jīng)濟(jì)法基本原則芻議[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年05期

8 譚澤林;;論經(jīng)濟(jì)法適用的基本原則[J];湖南醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年04期

9 趙江輝,晉登昆;應(yīng)及早完善我國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)法理論[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇;2003年07期

10 湯黎虹;論經(jīng)濟(jì)法目標(biāo)模式[J];華僑大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 秦守勤;;論經(jīng)濟(jì)法的和諧理念[A];城市經(jīng)濟(jì)與微區(qū)位研究——全國(guó)城市經(jīng)濟(jì)地理與微區(qū)位學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2004年

2 鄭少華;;論20世紀(jì)下半葉日本經(jīng)濟(jì)法理論對(duì)我國(guó)的影響[A];全國(guó)外國(guó)法制史研究會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)叢書——20世紀(jì)外國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)法的前沿[C];2001年

3 方立新;黎麗;;經(jīng)濟(jì)法特性之學(xué)理探討[A];全國(guó)外國(guó)法制史研究會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)叢書——20世紀(jì)外國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)法的前沿[C];2001年

4 賈曉燕;;論經(jīng)濟(jì)法的創(chuàng)新——和諧社會(huì)目標(biāo)與科學(xué)發(fā)展道路[A];科學(xué)發(fā)展觀：理論·模式·實(shí)踐——山東省社會(huì)科學(xué)界2006年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)文集（1）[C];2006年

5 肖光輝;;20世紀(jì)世界經(jīng)濟(jì)法理論的幾個(gè)問題——介紹與評(píng)說[A];全國(guó)外國(guó)法制史研究會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)叢書——20世紀(jì)外國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)法的前沿[C];2001年

6 任超;;20世紀(jì)外國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)法的理論與實(shí)踐——全國(guó)外國(guó)法制史研究會(huì)第十四屆年會(huì)綜述[A];全國(guó)外國(guó)法制史研究會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)叢書——20世紀(jì)外國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)法的前沿[C];2001年

7 魏瓊;;法國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)法之特色[A];全國(guó)外國(guó)法制史研究會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)叢書——20世紀(jì)外國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)法的前沿[C];2001年

8 楊德敏;;經(jīng)濟(jì)法理念與和諧社會(huì)的構(gòu)建[A];城市經(jīng)濟(jì)與微區(qū)位研究——全國(guó)城市經(jīng)濟(jì)地理與微區(qū)位學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2004年

9 劉雁翎;;從經(jīng)濟(jì)法與行政法的區(qū)別考量經(jīng)濟(jì)法的獨(dú)立性[A];第二屆貴州法學(xué)論壇文集[C];2001年

10 ;《中華人民共和國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)法(草案)》[A];全國(guó)外國(guó)法制史研究會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)叢書——20世紀(jì)外國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)法的前沿[C];2001年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 山西師范大學(xué) 王小平　太原理工大學(xué) 張繼昕;簡(jiǎn)論經(jīng)濟(jì)法責(zé)任的特征[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

2 曹程恩;論經(jīng)濟(jì)法價(jià)值的存在及其本質(zhì)[N];中華合作時(shí)報(bào);2005年

3 匯豐銀行北京分行 石淼　北京市海淀區(qū)人民法院 石金平;保障食品生產(chǎn)安全：經(jīng)濟(jì)法義不容辭[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

4 李業(yè)順;經(jīng)濟(jì)法在新形勢(shì)下的特殊使命[N];國(guó)際商報(bào);2009年

5 于寧;金融危機(jī)條件下的經(jīng)濟(jì)法理論再認(rèn)識(shí)[N];國(guó)際商報(bào);2010年

6 中南大學(xué)、武漢大學(xué)教授 中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)法研究會(huì)副會(huì)長(zhǎng) 漆多俊;經(jīng)濟(jì)法——利益資源的再分配法[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

7 本報(bào)記者 曾詩(shī)越;新興經(jīng)濟(jì)法——與時(shí)俱進(jìn)與創(chuàng)新發(fā)展[N];亞太經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)報(bào);2008年

8 閆翠翠;形成合力的理論是最好的經(jīng)濟(jì)法理論[N];國(guó)際商報(bào);2009年

9 葛敏 本報(bào)記者樂欣;專家學(xué)者聚焦經(jīng)濟(jì)法四大問題[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2002年

10 江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)法學(xué)院 蔣悟真;經(jīng)濟(jì)法的法域歸屬及其思維變革[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 齊建輝;經(jīng)濟(jì)法運(yùn)行的正當(dāng)程序機(jī)制研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年

2 王涪寧;經(jīng)濟(jì)法責(zé)任研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2007年

3 穆虹;經(jīng)濟(jì)法價(jià)值研究[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

4 陳治;論福利供給變遷中的經(jīng)濟(jì)法功能[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年

5 薛克鵬;經(jīng)濟(jì)法定義研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2002年

6 葉明;經(jīng)濟(jì)法實(shí)質(zhì)化研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2003年

7 劉水林;經(jīng)濟(jì)法基本范疇的整體主義解釋[D];西南政法大學(xué);2005年

8 雍靈;經(jīng)濟(jì)法視野中的公平[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年

9 石金平;經(jīng)濟(jì)法責(zé)任研究[D];中南大學(xué);2010年

10 徐子良;經(jīng)濟(jì)法司法實(shí)施之應(yīng)用研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 金彤方;經(jīng)濟(jì)法責(zé)任理論探析[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年

2 于坤;經(jīng)濟(jì)法責(zé)任的歸責(zé)探析[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

3 瞿凡凱;政府的經(jīng)濟(jì)法責(zé)任研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2011年

4 宋雄斌;經(jīng)濟(jì)法責(zé)任研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2011年

5 周虹;論經(jīng)濟(jì)法的法律責(zé)任[D];華南理工大學(xué);2011年

6 曹勝亮;經(jīng)濟(jì)法責(zé)任的獨(dú)立和獨(dú)立的經(jīng)濟(jì)法責(zé)任[D];華中師范大學(xué);2005年

7 劉立霞;經(jīng)濟(jì)法產(chǎn)生動(dòng)因分析[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2005年

8 周麗娜;經(jīng)濟(jì)法責(zé)任研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2006年

9 譚喜祥;中西經(jīng)濟(jì)法產(chǎn)生發(fā)展道路差異研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2004年

10 王政杰;論經(jīng)濟(jì)法的調(diào)整對(duì)象[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2186255