自發(fā)到自覺:我國市場(chǎng)信息不對(duì)稱法律規(guī)制體系研究
[Abstract]:Information asymmetry will lead to market failure, adverse selection and moral hazard. This problem is a hidden danger of effective market. The market itself can not be solved. It needs the mandatory intervention of public institutions, while the general public institutions lack authority. Therefore, it needs the legal regulation of the government. The distribution and adjustment of property rights can bring more social welfare than the adjustment of transaction itself when the property rights are greater than zero. Therefore, the key to the legal regulation of market information asymmetry lies in the distribution of information disclosure obligation and the relief for breach of this obligation. Lack of third-party tools, incentive tools, lack of economic and legal theoretical basis in the legal system of legal regulation; lack of summary of the core content of the legal regulation of market information asymmetry. According to the principle of interest obligation, we should formulate the separate punishment rule and the inversion rule of burden of proof for violating the obligation of information disclosure, and form the principle and rule system of the legal regulation of information asymmetry. Qualitative and classification of behavior; legal liability of information asymmetry behavior; perfecting information disclosure tools of third parties and social public welfare organizations; setting up punishment tools according to cost-benefit theory; normalizing incentive tools; setting up reasonable combination tools; forming a legal system of information asymmetry regulation.
【作者單位】: 山東女子學(xué)院社會(huì)與法學(xué)院;山東女子學(xué)院知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)研究中心;山東大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院;山東大學(xué)信用研究中心;
【基金】:山東省人文社會(huì)科學(xué)項(xiàng)目(15-JS-YB-11)
【分類號(hào)】:D922.294
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 閆婷婷;;從證券立法角度談信息不對(duì)稱問題[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)理人;2006年11期
2 張學(xué)文;陳燕鳳;;金融服務(wù)者之說明義務(wù)[J];福建金融管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年01期
3 王開田,婁權(quán);會(huì)計(jì)信息管制的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析——兼評(píng)《會(huì)計(jì)法》的作用[J];四川會(huì)計(jì);2000年11期
4 楊勇;;旅游購物欺詐及其成因分析[J];教育教學(xué)論壇;2013年39期
5 龍穩(wěn)全,李國獻(xiàn);“有獎(jiǎng)發(fā)票”的法律經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[J];廣東商學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年05期
6 張麗娜;;以民商法與經(jīng)濟(jì)法的視角看信息不對(duì)稱的法律規(guī)制[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2014年11期
7 劉愷;孫蕊;;銀行個(gè)人理財(cái)中的法律低效應(yīng)用及其解決路徑[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬);2013年03期
8 許敏;劉珂;;對(duì)QFII制度下證券信息不對(duì)稱問題的法律思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年10期
9 鄧進(jìn);;論商業(yè)賄賂及其管制[J];山西財(cái)政稅務(wù)?茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期
10 宋怡欣;;按揭貸款信息不對(duì)稱性的比較法研究[J];消費(fèi)經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年03期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 應(yīng)飛虎;信息失靈的制度克服研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2002年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 田雨靈;消費(fèi)信息不對(duì)稱法律規(guī)制研究[D];安徽財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年
2 耿磊;消費(fèi)信息不對(duì)稱的法律規(guī)制研究[D];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué);2012年
,本文編號(hào):2185379
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2185379.html