本文選題：“三包”制度 + 政府干預(yù)邊界　； 參考：《東南學(xué)術(shù)》2015年05期

【摘要】：從"經(jīng)濟(jì)法作為國(guó)家干預(yù)、協(xié)調(diào)經(jīng)濟(jì)之法"的本質(zhì)出發(fā),透過(guò)政府干預(yù)邊界的視角,對(duì)"三包"制度正當(dāng)性進(jìn)行考量可知:"三包"責(zé)任與瑕疵擔(dān)保責(zé)任存在本質(zhì)區(qū)別,"三包"制度造成了產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量責(zé)任體系的混亂,反映出政府干預(yù)與市場(chǎng)作用的失衡,究其根本原因在于公權(quán)力的擴(kuò)張及政府干預(yù)的越界�，F(xiàn)階段,有必要廢止"三包"規(guī)定,制定《消費(fèi)品質(zhì)量擔(dān)保法》,通過(guò)提高立法層級(jí)、設(shè)定最低擔(dān)保條件、加強(qiáng)產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量監(jiān)管,實(shí)現(xiàn)質(zhì)量擔(dān)保體系的重構(gòu)及政府干預(yù)邊界的回歸。
[Abstract]:Starting from the essence of "economic law as a state intervention and coordination of the law of the economy", through the examination of the legitimacy of the "three package" system through the perspective of government intervention on the border, it is known that there are essential differences between the "three package" responsibility and the liability for defect guarantee. The system of "three packages" causes the confusion of the system of product quality responsibility, reflecting the loss of government intervention and the role of the market. The fundamental reason lies in the expansion of public power and the cross boundary of government intervention. At this stage, it is necessary to abolish the "three package" provisions, formulate the quality guarantee law of consumer goods, set the legislative level, set the minimum guarantee conditions, strengthen the supervision of the quality of products, realize the reconstruction of the quality guarantee system and the return of the government intervention border.
【作者單位】： 華南理工大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D630;D923.8
，

本文編號(hào)：2108018