本文選題：上市公司 + 反收購措施�。� 參考：《新疆大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：市場經(jīng)濟的持續(xù)發(fā)展和股權(quán)分置改革的全面普及,催生了我國收購市場充滿活力的全新局面,上市公司控制權(quán)更迭也日益頻繁。上市公司為避免遭遇敵意收購,會采用預防性的反收購措施。而面對現(xiàn)時的敵意收購,則多采取對抗性的反收購措施。通常,反收購行為對象只能是敵意收購,且以維護目標公司及股東利益為目的,采用正當?shù)姆词召彺胧┠軌虮苊馍鲜泄驹庥鰯骋馐召?最大程度地保護公司與股東利益。但由于我國資本市場尚不成熟,有關(guān)收購、反收購方面的經(jīng)驗相對欠缺,立法方面也不完善。導致在實踐中,很多目標公司實施的一些反收購措施不僅浪費了良好資源整合的機會,甚至損害了目標公司及其股東的權(quán)益。因此反收購諸措施合法性的判斷至關(guān)重要。筆者通過對我國現(xiàn)行反收購立法的介紹與分析,對常見的反收購措施的合法性進行了檢驗,并結(jié)合與國外相關(guān)立法的比較,指出了我國現(xiàn)行反收購立法中存在的不足,最后結(jié)合我國國情,對當前立法規(guī)制的缺失提出了一些建議。本文內(nèi)容主要分為四部分:第一章第一節(jié)主要介紹了反收購及敵意收購的概念,上市公司之所以反收購的原因;第二節(jié)介紹了我國立法中有關(guān)反收購措施的相關(guān)規(guī)定;第三節(jié)探討了反收購措施合法性的判斷標準。第二章第一節(jié)詳細介紹了反收購措施的幾種常見類型,并對上市公司常采用的幾種具體反收購措施的合法性進行了檢驗;第二節(jié)通過介紹幾類經(jīng)典反收購案例,討論了反收購措施在實踐中運用情況。第三章反映了在反收購諸措施合法性研究過程當中顯現(xiàn)出的問題,即反收購行為規(guī)制相關(guān)立法的缺失。第四部分主要針對我國反收購相關(guān)立法缺失的問題,相應地提出了立法規(guī)制的建議。
[Abstract]:The sustained development of market economy and the popularization of the reform of split share structure have given birth to a new situation that is full of vitality in the acquisition market of our country, and the change of control rights of listed companies is also becoming more and more frequent. Listed companies in order to avoid hostile takeover, will use preventive anti-takeover measures. And in the face of the current hostile takeover, more antagonistic anti-takeover measures. Usually, the object of anti-takeover can only be hostile takeover, and in order to protect the interests of the target company and shareholders, adopting proper anti-takeover measures can avoid the hostile takeover of listed companies and protect the interests of companies and shareholders to the greatest extent. However, the capital market of our country is not mature, the experience of acquisition and anti-takeover is relatively short, and the legislation is not perfect. In practice, some anti-takeover measures implemented by many target companies not only waste the opportunity of good resource integration, but also damage the rights and interests of target companies and their shareholders. So the legitimacy of anti-takeover measures is crucial. Through the introduction and analysis of the current anti-takeover legislation in China, the author tests the legitimacy of the common anti-takeover measures, and points out the shortcomings of the current anti-takeover legislation in China. Finally, according to the situation of our country, some suggestions are put forward on the deficiency of current legislation. The content of this paper is divided into four parts: chapter one mainly introduces the concepts of anti-takeover and hostile takeover, the reasons of the anti-takeover of listed companies, the second section introduces the relevant provisions of anti-takeover measures in Chinese legislation. The third section discusses the judgment standard of the legality of anti-takeover measures. The first section of the second chapter introduces several common types of anti-takeover measures in detail, and tests the legitimacy of several specific anti-takeover measures often adopted by listed companies; the second section introduces several classic anti-takeover cases. The application of anti-takeover measures in practice is discussed. The third chapter reflects the problems in the study of the legality of anti-takeover measures, that is, the lack of legislation related to the regulation of anti-takeover. In the fourth part, the author puts forward the suggestion of legislative regulation in view of the lack of legislation related to anti-takeover in China.
【學位授予單位】：新疆大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王愛;建立我國反收購制度法律框架的設(shè)想[J];山西高等學校社會科學學報;2004年11期

2 顏健;陳銀華;;惡意反收購研究[J];法制與社會;2006年24期

3 王宏宇;寧銘;;公司反收購法律規(guī)制的檢討與應對[J];邵陽學院學報(社會科學版);2007年06期

4 王蕾;;反收購措施法律規(guī)制之比較[J];網(wǎng)絡(luò)財富;2008年12期

5 郭洪濤;;淺析我國反收購制度[J];法制與社會;2008年02期

6 滕雨格;;我國上市公司反收購制度缺失及其構(gòu)建[J];商;2013年15期

7 趙明,徐斌;論上市公司反收購的法律規(guī)制[J];池州師專學報;2001年01期

8 安麗;英美關(guān)于上市公司反收購立法對我國的啟示[J];湖北社會科學;2002年07期

9 高慧云;中國上市公司反收購立法探討[J];北京交通管理干部學院學報;2002年03期

10 王騰;對建立我國反收購制度的法律思考[J];高等函授學報(哲學社會科學版);2003年05期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前3條

1 黃亮;上市公司反收購法律規(guī)制研究[D];吉林大學;2010年

2 謝銀玲;上市公司對外資敵意并購之反收購對策研究[D];華東政法大學;2010年

3 張本照;目標公司反收購及政府規(guī)制相關(guān)問題研究[D];合肥工業(yè)大學;2006年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前10條

1 武澤華;我國上市公司反收購法律問題評析[D];外交學院;2009年

2 胡鐵軍;中國上市公司反收購法律問題研究[D];對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學;2007年

3 劉s，

本文編號：2052761