發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-25 15:38

  本文選題：附加限制性條件 + 經(jīng)營(yíng)者集中　； 參考：《南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：《中華人民共和反壟斷法》第二十九條規(guī)定：“對(duì)不予禁止的經(jīng)營(yíng)者集中,國(guó)務(wù)院反壟斷執(zhí)法機(jī)構(gòu)可以決定附加減少集中對(duì)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)產(chǎn)生不利影響的限制性條件。”隨著各國(guó)間的經(jīng)濟(jì)交流愈加緊密,各經(jīng)營(yíng)者間的合并、收購(gòu)等手段越來(lái)越激烈,經(jīng)營(yíng)者集中逐漸成為世界的主流趨勢(shì)之一。但是經(jīng)營(yíng)者集中在促進(jìn)規(guī)模經(jīng)濟(jì)、資源整合、優(yōu)化產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)等方面有著優(yōu)點(diǎn)外,缺點(diǎn)也必然是存在的,例如易造成企業(yè)壟斷、限制商品競(jìng)爭(zhēng)從而最終危害消費(fèi)者的效益等。因而附加限制性條件的批準(zhǔn)經(jīng)營(yíng)者集中是十分有效的折中方式,在一定程度上促進(jìn)合并發(fā)展的同時(shí)更有助于維護(hù)整個(gè)社會(huì)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)秩序。根據(jù)不同企業(yè)的不同狀況,我國(guó)對(duì)各個(gè)案例的解決方法和通過(guò)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)也必然不同。通過(guò)對(duì)大部分資料的閱讀以及分析,眾多的文章主要研究了2013年以前的案例以及更多的是屬于理論性的研究,這對(duì)于近兩年來(lái)這方面的發(fā)展不得不說(shuō)是種重大的忽略。從反壟斷法的發(fā)展來(lái)說(shuō),這兩年的發(fā)展的確是屬于飛速發(fā)展的階段,各類經(jīng)濟(jì)情況隨著科技、人們思想觀念進(jìn)步的發(fā)現(xiàn)日新月異的出現(xiàn),可是這方面的論文及著作反而減少了通過(guò)的案例更是少有學(xué)者進(jìn)行研究,沒(méi)有了正確的理論指導(dǎo)以及激烈的討論很容易使其失去了目標(biāo)。本文希望通過(guò)簡(jiǎn)述國(guó)內(nèi)附加限制性條件的部分典型情況以及重點(diǎn)詳述對(duì)我國(guó)自2008年頒布《中華人民共和反壟斷法》后通過(guò)的經(jīng)營(yíng)者集中附加限制性條件的21個(gè)成功案例的各個(gè)方面的比較研究,以達(dá)到對(duì)之前的實(shí)踐加以總結(jié)提出一定的法律建議以期未來(lái)法律的更加完善。除了引言和結(jié)論部分以外,本文將分為以下三部分。第一部分主要是針對(duì)附加限制性條件的經(jīng)營(yíng)者集中進(jìn)行理論上的解析。通過(guò)對(duì)附加限制性條件的概念、作用、特點(diǎn)、分類等方面的論述,從宏觀的角度了解附加限制性條件的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)。第二部分對(duì)我國(guó)附加限制性條件的司法實(shí)踐和立法現(xiàn)狀,通過(guò)3個(gè)列表的21個(gè)案件的對(duì)比、4個(gè)比較能表現(xiàn)特性的具體案例分析,主要研究我國(guó)經(jīng)營(yíng)者集中附加的限制性條件的現(xiàn)狀。最后針對(duì)總體案例的三方面的比較論述總結(jié)近些年來(lái)得出我國(guó)商務(wù)部采取的附限制性條件的種類和他們目前處理這類案件的態(tài)度和傾向。第三部分是通過(guò)分析前兩部分所論述的附加限制條件經(jīng)營(yíng)者集中的理論和實(shí)踐,以提出對(duì)我國(guó)實(shí)施附加限制性條件的建議。
[Abstract]:Article 29 of the people's Republic of China Anti-Monopoly Law stipulates: "for the concentration of operators that are not prohibited, the antitrust enforcement agency under the State Council may decide to attach restrictive conditions to reduce the adverse impact of concentration on competition." With the closer economic exchanges among countries, the merger and acquisition among operators, the concentration of operators has gradually become one of the mainstream trends in the world. However, there are many advantages and disadvantages in promoting scale economy, resource integration and optimizing industrial structure. For example, it is easy to cause enterprise monopoly, limit commodity competition and ultimately harm the benefit of consumers and so on. Therefore, the concentration of approved operators with restrictive conditions is a very effective compromise, and to a certain extent, it can promote the development of merger and at the same time help to maintain the competition order of the whole society. According to the different conditions of different enterprises, the solutions and adoption standards of each case must be different in China. Through the reading and analysis of most of the materials, many articles mainly study the cases before 2013 and more are theoretical studies, which is a great neglect for the development of this field in the last two years. From the point of view of the development of anti-monopoly law, the development of these two years really belongs to the stage of rapid development. With the development of science and technology, people's ideas and ideas are developing with each passing day. However, the papers and works in this field have reduced the number of cases adopted by scholars, and without correct theoretical guidance and fierce discussion, it is easy to lose its goal. This article hopes to briefly describe some typical cases of domestic restrictive conditions and to focus on the introduction of 21 restrictive conditions to operators adopted since the promulgation of the people's Republic of China Anti-monopoly Law in 2008. A comparative study of various aspects of work cases, In order to achieve the previous practice to summarize and put forward some legal recommendations in order to improve the law in the future. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article will be divided into the following three parts. The first part is the theoretical analysis of the concentration of operators with additional restrictive conditions. By discussing the concept, function, characteristics and classification of additional restrictive conditions, the advantages and disadvantages of additional restrictive conditions are understood from the macro point of view. In the second part, through the comparison of 21 cases in 3 lists, 4 specific cases which can express their characteristics are analyzed by comparing the judicial practice and legislative status of our country with restrictive conditions. This paper mainly studies the current situation of the additional restrictive conditions for the concentration of operators in China. Finally, according to the comparison of the three aspects of the overall case, the author summarizes the types of restrictive conditions adopted by the Ministry of Commerce in recent years and their attitude and tendency to deal with such cases at present. The third part is through the analysis of the theory and practice of the concentration of the operators with additional restrictions discussed in the first two parts in order to put forward some suggestions on the implementation of the additional restrictive conditions in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 張晨穎;[N];國(guó)際商報(bào);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1933776