本文選題：第三方支付 + 盜竊罪　； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報》2017年03期

【摘要】：秘密轉(zhuǎn)移他人第三方支付平臺賬戶資金的犯罪行為表現(xiàn)為直接轉(zhuǎn)移平臺賬戶內(nèi)資金和轉(zhuǎn)移平臺賬戶所綁定銀行卡內(nèi)資金等兩種行為方式。司法實踐中應(yīng)區(qū)分這兩種行為方式,對直接轉(zhuǎn)移他人支付寶賬戶內(nèi)資金的行為以盜竊罪認(rèn)定,而對轉(zhuǎn)移他人支付寶賬戶所綁定銀行卡內(nèi)資金的行為以信用卡詐騙罪認(rèn)定。從刑民結(jié)合的角度來看,應(yīng)認(rèn)定第三方支付平臺是提供資金轉(zhuǎn)移服務(wù)的中介機(jī)構(gòu),刑事認(rèn)定可突出對第三方支付平臺接受指令運行行為的思考,民事認(rèn)定可在第三方支付平臺與銀行、賬戶權(quán)利人之間合同關(guān)系的框架下把握。
[Abstract]:The criminal behavior of secretly transferring the funds of the third party to pay platform account is manifested in two kinds of behavior: direct transfer of funds in platform account and transfer of funds in bank card bound to platform account. In judicial practice, we should distinguish these two kinds of behavior ways, to the direct transfer of other people's Alipay account funds in the act of theft, and transfer other people's Alipay account bound in the bank card to determine the behavior of credit card fraud. From the angle of the combination of criminal and civilian, the third party payment platform should be considered as the intermediary to provide the fund transfer service, and the criminal identification can highlight the thinking about the third party payment platform receiving the instruction operation behavior. Civil cognizance can be grasped under the framework of the contractual relationship between the third party payment platform and the bank and account holder.
【作者單位】： 華東政法大學(xué)刑事法學(xué)研究院;上海市普陀區(qū)人民檢察院;
【分類號】：D922.28;D924.35

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王瑛;;第三方支付賬戶“失竊”之定性研究[J];中國檢察官;2014年02期

2 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 姚利;利用第三方支付平臺實施犯罪的若干問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

2 陳振東;第三方支付的反欺詐對策研究[D];廣東財經(jīng)大學(xué);2016年

，

本文編號：1865926