本文選題：市場退出 + 主動退出　； 參考：《寧波大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：企業(yè)法人作為最重要的經(jīng)濟主體,經(jīng)市場準入制度進入市場參與經(jīng)濟運行,因主動的或被動的原因而解散,通過辦理清算、注銷登記等程序,完成從市場機制中的退出。可見,從設立到發(fā)展再到終止,企業(yè)法人的一生都離不開完備的法律法規(guī)的保駕護航與鞭策規(guī)制。鑒于企業(yè)法人的進入制度、運行制度現(xiàn)有法律已規(guī)制的相對完善,故本文的著眼點在于企業(yè)法人的市場退出制度,以經(jīng)濟市場中企業(yè)法人退出市場的現(xiàn)實狀況和國內(nèi)外現(xiàn)行的市場退出制度為研究基礎,將全文分為四個篇章。開篇介紹企業(yè)法人退出市場是指具有法人資格的企業(yè)基于法定事由,經(jīng)過特定程序,退出交易和競爭領域,使企業(yè)法人喪失經(jīng)營資格和法人資格的行為,該行為具有主體特定、原因多樣、程序法定和結(jié)果唯一四大屬性,而對企業(yè)法人退出行為進行規(guī)制的退出制度則具有維護社會秩序的穩(wěn)定、維持市場競爭的效率和維固公眾利益的平衡三大功用。企業(yè)法人退出市場的原因、退出市場的途徑、我國現(xiàn)行企業(yè)法人市場退出制度的瑕疵以及實務中企業(yè)法人退出市場時所凸顯的種種問題是本文的重中之重,文中分兩個篇章來論述此部分。主動和被動是本文對企業(yè)法人的市場退出作出的兩種分類形式,這種分類的依據(jù)主要是企業(yè)法人的退出意愿。通過比較主動退出和被動退出這兩種退出路徑在我國立法和域外立法中的差異,本文創(chuàng)造性地提出了倡導型法律制度構(gòu)建和規(guī)制型法律制度構(gòu)建兩種制度架構(gòu)模型,鼓勵企業(yè)法人適時合法的主動退出,規(guī)制企業(yè)法人因違規(guī)或違法的被動退出。企業(yè)法人退出市場的最后關卡——注銷制度,是企業(yè)法人終結(jié)市場主體身份的標志,無論是主動退出還是被動退出都必須經(jīng)過注銷登記,否則企業(yè)法人便會以“休眠”狀態(tài)一直存在于經(jīng)濟市場體系中,時刻威脅著經(jīng)濟市場的運行安全,故本文在闡述注銷制度在我國和域外立法實踐的基礎上,提出了引入注銷提示、優(yōu)化注銷手續(xù)和強化注銷公告的建議,以期在現(xiàn)行注銷制度的基礎上進行改良優(yōu)化,進而完善我國企業(yè)法人退出市場制度。
[Abstract]:As the most important economic subject, the enterprise legal person enters the market to participate in the economic operation through the market access system, dissolves because of the active or passive reason, completes the withdrawal from the market mechanism through the procedures of liquidation, cancellation of registration and so on. It can be seen that from establishment to development to termination, corporate life can not be separated from complete laws and regulations escort and spur regulation. In view of the entry system of the enterprise legal person and the relative perfection of the existing laws and regulations of the operation system, the focus of this paper is on the market exit system of the enterprise legal person. Based on the actual situation of corporate withdrawal from the market in the economic market and the current market withdrawal system at home and abroad, this paper is divided into four chapters. The first introduction to the withdrawal of an enterprise legal person from the market means that an enterprise with legal personality withdraws from the field of transaction and competition through a specific procedure based on statutory reasons, thus disabling the business and legal personality of the enterprise as a legal person. The act has a specific subject. The reasons are various, the procedural law and the result are the only four attributes, and the withdrawal system which regulates the withdrawal behavior of the enterprise legal person has three functions: maintaining the stability of social order, maintaining the efficiency of market competition and maintaining the balance of public interests. The reasons for the withdrawal of the enterprise legal person from the market, the ways to exit the market, the defects of the exiting system of the enterprise legal person market in our country and the problems highlighted when the enterprise legal person exits the market in practice are the most important in this paper. This part is discussed in two chapters. Active and passive are two kinds of classification forms of the market withdrawal of the enterprise legal person, which is mainly based on the withdrawal intention of the enterprise legal person. By comparing the differences between active exit and passive exit in China's legislation and foreign legislation, this paper creatively puts forward two kinds of system structure models: the construction of advocacy legal system and the construction of regulatory legal system. Encourage enterprise legal person to withdraw actively and legally, and regulate the enterprise legal person to withdraw passively because of illegal or illegal. The deregistration system, the last hurdle for the withdrawal of the enterprise legal person from the market, is the symbol of the termination of the identity of the main body of the market by the enterprise legal person. Whether it is an active withdrawal or a passive exit, it must go through the cancellation registration. Otherwise, the enterprise legal person will always exist in the economic market system in the state of "dormancy", which threatens the operation safety of the economic market at all times. The paper puts forward the suggestion of introducing cancellation prompt, optimizing the procedures of cancellation and strengthening the notice of cancellation, in order to improve and optimize on the basis of the current cancellation system, and then perfect the withdrawal system of our country's enterprise legal person from the market.
【學位授予單位】：寧波大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 喬剛;期貨市場的特征與功能[J];w蕓，

本文編號：1827585