本文選題：公司法價值 + 效率��； 參考：《沈陽工業(yè)大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：法的價值一直是法學研究的一個熱點,只有研究法的價值,才能制定出更好的符合法的目的的法律。我國公司法還處于初期發(fā)展階段,還未能全面解決市場經濟中出現(xiàn)的種種問題。只有對公司法價值體系配置進行深入研究,研究公司法價值體系如何構建才能更好地實現(xiàn)公司治理目的,制定符合我國國情的公司法制度。本文首先對公司法的價值進行概述,分析了公司法的效率、自由、安全、公平及秩序等價值的具體內涵,公司法包含這些價值是為了實現(xiàn)什么目的。其次對國外公司法發(fā)展變化以及價值體系配置進行了研究。通過考察德國公司法制度,圍繞雙層委員會結構、管理委員會和監(jiān)事會互相監(jiān)督制約、權責對等,指出德國公司法重視安全下的效率,同時配套了公示公信監(jiān)督制度,使得德國的公司在“陽光下”運營,建立了德國公司誠信經營的機制。而針對英國公司法董事治理結構,則指出英國公司法重視自由與效率價值;英國的董事權力監(jiān)督制度體現(xiàn)了英國公司法保障其他相關者利益安全的價值追求。對于美國公司法,著重分析了從政府放任企業(yè)自治,自由參加市場競爭,到現(xiàn)代美國公司法建立的董事監(jiān)督和信息披露制度。提出董事注意義務和忠實義務,保障股東、雇員、債權人、客戶、社區(qū)等相關人權益,體現(xiàn)了美國公司法從注重自由和效率價值,到兼顧安全和公平價值,并最終保障市場秩序穩(wěn)定。再次,通過分析我國公司法修改歷程以及價值配置現(xiàn)狀,指出我國現(xiàn)行公司法價值配置存在的問題和原因。最后通過對德英美公司法價值配置的借鑒,提出了以效率為主線、以安全為輔助、以公平為目的、實現(xiàn)公司利益相關人權益保障和企業(yè)社會責任承擔的我國公司法價值合理配置的理論建議。本文運用了比較分析和價值分析等方法對我國公司法價值體系的合理配置進行了系統(tǒng)的研究,用歷史分析方法研究了國外公司法的發(fā)展以及價值取向,用比較分析方法對國外公司法價值追求進行分析,并以此提出可以借鑒的制度內容,為我國公司法價值體系配置提出合理化建議。
[Abstract]:The value of law has always been a hot topic in the study of law. Only by studying the value of law can we make a better law that conforms to the purpose of law. The company law of our country is still in the initial stage of development, and it has not solved all kinds of problems in the market economy. Only by deeply studying the allocation of company law value system and studying how to construct company law value system can we better realize the purpose of corporate governance and formulate a company law system that conforms to the national conditions of our country. This paper first summarizes the value of company law, analyzes the specific connotation of efficiency, freedom, security, fairness and order of the company law, and what purpose does the company law contain these values to achieve. Secondly, the development and change of foreign company law and the allocation of value system are studied. By examining the German company law system, focusing on the structure of the two-tier committee, the supervision and restriction between the management committee and the supervisory board, the equivalence of powers and responsibilities, it is pointed out that the German company law attaches importance to the efficiency under the security situation, and at the same time it supports the supervision system of public information and public trust. German companies operating in the "sunshine", the establishment of German companies in good faith operating mechanism. In view of the governance structure of British company directors, it is pointed out that the British company law attaches importance to the value of freedom and efficiency, and the supervision system of British directors' power reflects the value pursuit of British company law to protect the interests of other stakeholders. As for the American Company Law, it focuses on the analysis of the system of director supervision and information disclosure, from the government's laissez-faire enterprise autonomy and free participation in market competition to the modern American company law's establishment of director supervision and information disclosure system. The duty of care and loyalty of directors and the protection of the rights and interests of shareholders, employees, creditors, customers, communities, and other related persons have reflected the US Company Law's emphasis on the value of freedom and efficiency, to the consideration of the value of safety and fairness. And ultimately ensure market order stability. Thirdly, by analyzing the course of our company law modification and the present situation of value allocation, this paper points out the problems and causes of our country's current company law value allocation. Finally, by referring to the value allocation of German and British company law, the author puts forward that efficiency is the main line, safety is auxiliary and fairness is the purpose. The theoretical suggestions on the rational allocation of corporate law value in order to protect the rights and interests of corporate stakeholders and bear corporate social responsibility. This paper makes a systematic study on the rational allocation of the value system of company law in our country by means of comparative analysis and value analysis, and studies the development and value orientation of foreign company law with the method of historical analysis. This paper analyzes the pursuit of corporate law value in foreign countries with the method of comparative analysis, and puts forward the system contents which can be used for reference, and puts forward some reasonable suggestions for the allocation of the value system of company law in our country.
【學位授予單位】：沈陽工業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 楊成良;;州際競爭與美國公司法的發(fā)展[J];比較法研究;2017年01期

2 孫婷;;2013年《公司法》修改的解讀與思考[J];法制博覽;2015年11期

3 雷興虎;薛波;;《公司法》修訂評析[J];新疆社科論壇;2014年04期

4 傅寅嘉;;論新《公司法》修改的主要內容及法律意義[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2014年07期

5 解正山;;美國公司法的聯(lián)邦主義:歷史成因與現(xiàn)代變革[J];學海;2014年03期

6 甘培忠;周游;;我國公司法建構中的國家角色[J];當代法學;2014年02期

7 岳衛(wèi)峰;;論市場經濟環(huán)境下我國公司法的價值訴求[J];山西財經大學學報;2012年S1期

8 魯茉莉;;德國公司治理改革的成效與問題[J];產業(yè)經濟研究;2011年01期

9 蔣舸;吳一興;;德國公司形式的最新變革及其啟示[J];法商研究;2011年01期

10 陳曉軍;;公司法理念的二元對立與價值斟酌[J];法學論壇;2009年06期

，

本文編號：1787287