本文選題：反壟斷私人訴訟　切入點：原告資格　出處：《廣東財經(jīng)大學》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：反壟斷法是保護市場競爭,防止和制止壟斷行為,維護市場秩序的重要法律。反壟斷法在發(fā)達國家的有效實施表明,經(jīng)濟的高速發(fā)展需要依靠制定相關法律來規(guī)范市場競爭行為。越來越多國家認識到反壟斷法在經(jīng)濟規(guī)制所帶來的作用。其中,反壟斷私人訴訟中的原告資格確定問題是展開訴訟的前提。因此,確定私人訴訟的原告資格范圍意義重大。全文共分為三章:第一章對何為反壟斷私人訴訟及其原告資格問題做了詳細論述,介紹了四種原告類型:競爭者、間接購買者、群體性受害者、消費者。同時,通過美國實踐中確立的“損害”標準和德國的“受影響”標準來探討確定原告資格范圍所考慮的因素,并通過我國立法上對原告資格的模糊規(guī)定來闡述確立原告資格標準的意義。第二章通過幾個案例介紹國外發(fā)達國家在反壟斷私人訴訟中確定原告資格的立法進程與各自所遇到的問題,系統(tǒng)對其問題進行評述并總結其中經(jīng)驗,為我國確定私人訴訟原告資格范圍提供理論支持。第三章通過介紹我國現(xiàn)行反壟斷法和相關司法解釋對私人訴訟原告資格范圍的籠統(tǒng)規(guī)定,同時借鑒世界各國的立法經(jīng)驗,提出在我國《反壟斷法》的基礎上新增法律條文來完善原告資格范圍。從立法層面上切實改變我國反壟斷私人訴訟原告資格范圍不明導致的起訴難與勝訴率低的問題,保障反壟斷私人訴訟原被告雙方的合法權益。并對競爭者、間接購買者、群體性受害者的原告資格問題提出相關制度建議。
[Abstract]:Anti-monopoly law is an important law to protect market competition, prevent and stop monopoly behavior and maintain market order. The effective implementation of anti-monopoly law in developed countries shows that, The rapid development of economy needs to make relevant laws to regulate market competition behavior. More and more countries realize the role of anti-monopoly law in economic regulation. The question of determining the plaintiff's qualification in private antitrust litigation is a prerequisite for initiating a lawsuit. It is of great significance to determine the scope of plaintiff qualification in private litigation. This paper is divided into three chapters: chapter one discusses in detail what is an antitrust private action and its plaintiff qualification, and introduces four types of plaintiffs: competitors, indirect purchasers, Group victims, consumers. At the same time, through the "damage" criterion established in United States practice and the German "affected" criterion, the factors considered in determining the scope of the plaintiff's qualification are discussed, The second chapter introduces the legislative process of determining plaintiff qualification in private antitrust litigation in developed countries through several cases. And the problems they encounter, The system reviews its problems and summarizes their experiences. The third chapter introduces the general provisions of the scope of private litigation plaintiff qualification in China's current anti-monopoly law and related judicial interpretation, and at the same time draws lessons from the legislative experience of other countries in the world, and provides theoretical support for the determination of the scope of the plaintiff's qualification in private litigation in China. On the basis of our country's Anti-monopoly Law, the author puts forward a new legal provision to perfect the scope of plaintiff's qualification. From the legislative level, it can effectively change the difficulty of prosecution and the low rate of success caused by the unclear scope of plaintiff's qualification in private antitrust litigation in our country. To protect the legal rights and interests of the original defendants in private antitrust litigation, and to put forward relevant system suggestions on the plaintiff qualification of competitors, indirect purchasers and group victims.
【學位授予單位】：廣東財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.294

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前3條

1 張駿;;我國《反壟斷法》的立法目的研究[J];重慶工商大學學報(社會科學版);2012年05期

2 沈志韜;;從國際經(jīng)驗看中國反壟斷私人執(zhí)行制度的建立[J];世界貿(mào)易組織動態(tài)與研究;2010年03期

3 谷帆凱;;反壟斷私人訴訟制度的必要性分析[J];政法學刊;2011年04期

相關碩士學位論文 前6條

1 袁有華;反壟斷法國家民事訴訟制度研究[D];湖南大學;2010年

2 王慧敏;反壟斷公益訴訟若干法律問題研究[D];湖南大學;2008年

3 鄧文鋒;反壟斷法私人執(zhí)行制度比較研究[D];湖南大學;2010年

4 李小凡;反壟斷訴訟中消費者的原告資格法律問題研究[D];北京交通大學;2012年

5 朱曉艷;反壟斷民事?lián)p害賠償制度比較研究[D];湖南大學;2011年

6 周秋云;反壟斷民事訴訟中間接購買者原告資格問題研究[D];湘潭大學;2013年

，

本文編號：1634640