本文選題：自動(dòng)駕駛汽車　切入點(diǎn)：智能機(jī)器人　出處：《法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào))》2017年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：隨著自動(dòng)駕駛汽車等智能機(jī)器人的自主性、學(xué)習(xí)和適應(yīng)能力不斷增強(qiáng),一方面很難將其看作是人類手中的簡單工具;另一方面伴隨而來的可預(yù)測(cè)性、可解釋性、因果關(guān)系等問題將使得證明產(chǎn)品缺陷責(zé)任等既有侵權(quán)責(zé)任變得越來越困難,可能帶來責(zé)任鴻溝,使得被侵權(quán)人的損害難以得到彌補(bǔ)。面對(duì)可預(yù)期的責(zé)任挑戰(zhàn),侵權(quán)法、合同法等法律規(guī)則的不充足性和局限性將逐漸顯現(xiàn)出來,對(duì)新的法律規(guī)則的需求也將變得越來越迫切。為此,歐盟、英國、美國等已經(jīng)開始探索新的責(zé)任框架。為了更合理、有效地對(duì)智能機(jī)器人造成的損害分配法律責(zé)任,嚴(yán)格責(zé)任、差別化責(zé)任、強(qiáng)制保險(xiǎn)和賠償基金、智能機(jī)器人法律人格等都是潛在的法律方案;但立法者或者法院最終選擇何種方案,需要進(jìn)行全方位的論證,以便實(shí)現(xiàn)法律的利益平衡目的。
[Abstract]:With the increasing autonomy, learning and adaptability of intelligent robots such as autonomous cars, it is difficult to see them as simple tools in human hands on the one hand, and the accompanying predictability and interpretability, on the other. The causality and other problems will make it more and more difficult to prove the existing tort liability such as product defect liability, which may bring the liability gap and make it difficult to make up for the damage of the infringed party. In the face of the expected liability challenge, the tort law, The inadequacies and limitations of legal rules such as contract law will gradually emerge, and the need for new legal rules will become more and more urgent. For this reason, the European Union, Britain, and the United States have begun to explore new liability frameworks. Effective allocation of legal liability, strict liability, differential liability, compulsory insurance and compensation fund, legal personality of intelligent robot are potential legal schemes. But the lawmaker or the court finally chooses which plan, needs to carry on the omni-directional argument, in order to realize the law benefit balance goal.
【作者單位】： 騰訊研究院;
【分類號(hào)】：D912.29;D913
，

本文編號(hào)：1560642