本文關(guān)鍵詞：我國(guó)政府采購(gòu)中第三人權(quán)利救濟(jì)的研究　出處：《蘭州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 政府采購(gòu) 合同授予階段 采購(gòu)人 第三人 權(quán)利救濟(jì)

【摘要】：政府采購(gòu)不同于一般企業(yè)和個(gè)人采購(gòu),因?yàn)榍罢呦鄬?duì)后兩者而言,不僅采購(gòu)數(shù)量和規(guī)模都比較龐大,而且當(dāng)國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)蕭條時(shí),擴(kuò)大政府采購(gòu)規(guī)模也是刺激經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的一種重要方式。因此,政府采購(gòu)的順利進(jìn)行十分重要,而要順利進(jìn)行就離不開(kāi)當(dāng)事人之間的互相合作。政府采購(gòu)的當(dāng)事人主要是供應(yīng)商和采購(gòu)人、采購(gòu)代理機(jī)構(gòu),第三人也是供應(yīng)商,即落標(biāo)或未能參與競(jìng)標(biāo)的供應(yīng)商�？傮w來(lái)說(shuō),政府采購(gòu)可以分為合同授予和合同履行兩個(gè)階段,在合同授予階段,爭(zhēng)議雙方主體主要是第三人與采購(gòu)人,而在合同履行階段雙方爭(zhēng)議的主體是中標(biāo)、成交的供應(yīng)商和采購(gòu)人。本文著重研究第三人權(quán)利救濟(jì),相對(duì)于履行階段,我們更加側(cè)重研究政府采購(gòu)合同授予階段。文章首先闡述了第三人含義以及第三人權(quán)利受到損害的各種原因；其次,為了借鑒域外國(guó)家或地區(qū)經(jīng)驗(yàn),還介紹了他們法律的一些規(guī)定,例如,歐盟的雙層救濟(jì)、WTO的《政府采購(gòu)協(xié)定》：再次,還指出當(dāng)前我國(guó)《政府采購(gòu)法》中一些不足之處,比如第三人范圍規(guī)定過(guò)于狹窄,投訴之前還需要經(jīng)過(guò)質(zhì)疑的前置性程序。最后,大膽地提出自己的一些建議,比如適當(dāng)擴(kuò)大第三人范圍并取消前置性程序規(guī)定。最終達(dá)到救濟(jì)第三人權(quán)利的目的。
[Abstract]:Government procurement is different from ordinary enterprises and private procurement, because the former is relatively large in quantity and scale, and when the national economy is depressed. Expanding the scale of government procurement is also an important way to stimulate economic growth. Therefore, the smooth progress of government procurement is very important. The government procurement parties are mainly suppliers and purchasers, procurement agencies, the third party is also a supplier. Generally speaking, government procurement can be divided into two stages: contract award and contract performance. In the contract award stage, the main parties to the dispute are mainly the third party and the purchaser. In the stage of contract performance, the main dispute between the two parties is the winning bid, the transaction of suppliers and purchasers. This paper focuses on the third party right relief, relative to the performance stage. We pay more attention to the awarding stage of government procurement contract. Firstly, the article expounds the meaning of the third party and the reasons why the third party's rights are damaged. Secondly, in order to learn from the experience of foreign countries or regions, they also introduced some provisions of their laws, for example, the EU's double relief WTO "Agreement on Government Procurement": again. It also points out some deficiencies in the current "Government Procurement Law", such as the scope of the third party is too narrow, the complaint needs to be questioned before the front-line procedures. Finally, boldly put forward some of their own suggestions. For example, the scope of the third party should be expanded appropriately and the pre-procedure provisions should be removed. Finally, the purpose of relief to the third party's rights would be achieved.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 傅光明;;關(guān)于完善《政府采購(gòu)法》的幾點(diǎn)建議[J];財(cái)政與發(fā)展;2007年07期

2 吳仁軍;;政府采購(gòu)第三人司法救濟(jì)制度研究[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年12期

，

本文編號(hào)：1434102