本文選題：離婚協(xié)議 + 贈(zèng)與約定��； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)當(dāng)前的婚姻觀念相較于上世紀(jì)已經(jīng)發(fā)生了深刻變化,在夫妻離婚過程中,為了方便、快捷地達(dá)到解除婚姻關(guān)系、脫離婚姻“泥沼”的目的,大部分夫妻會(huì)選擇到民政部門登記離婚,簽訂一份離婚協(xié)議。本來(lái)簡(jiǎn)單的以解除婚姻關(guān)系為核心內(nèi)容的離婚協(xié)議,往往會(huì)附加一些其他條款,使得離婚協(xié)議的內(nèi)容豐富起來(lái),除單純的解除人身關(guān)系外,增加了財(cái)產(chǎn)關(guān)系的內(nèi)容,比如在離婚協(xié)議中約定贈(zèng)與。在司法實(shí)踐中,因離婚協(xié)議中約定贈(zèng)與而發(fā)生糾紛的案件越來(lái)越多。對(duì)該類糾紛目前尚無(wú)直接的法律規(guī)定可循,各地人民法院對(duì)此類糾紛的裁判觀點(diǎn)也不一致,相似案件存在相左判決。而法學(xué)理論界圍繞離婚協(xié)議中約定贈(zèng)與的性質(zhì)和贈(zèng)與人是否享有任意撤銷權(quán)也是仁智各見。對(duì)此,本文以夫妻在婚姻登記機(jī)關(guān)協(xié)議離婚時(shí),雙方所簽訂的離婚協(xié)議中約定贈(zèng)與的情形進(jìn)行研究討論,采用實(shí)證分析和理論分析相結(jié)合的方法,通過梳理實(shí)務(wù)案例,結(jié)合婚姻、合同、物權(quán)、訴訟法學(xué)理論知識(shí),探析構(gòu)建“離婚協(xié)議中約定贈(zèng)與”糾紛的司法判定規(guī)則。除開引言外,正文共分為五個(gè)部分,約2萬(wàn)字。第一部分問題的提出。介紹“王某與王光林贈(zèng)與合同糾紛案”的案件情況,引出對(duì)“離婚協(xié)議中約定贈(zèng)與”糾紛的疑問。通過檢索中國(guó)裁判文書網(wǎng),收集類似案例,制成案例分析表(見附件一),歸納出“離婚協(xié)議中約定贈(zèng)與”糾紛的四種具體情形:(1)一方個(gè)人財(cái)產(chǎn),協(xié)議離婚時(shí)約定贈(zèng)與另一方;(2)一方個(gè)人財(cái)產(chǎn),協(xié)議離婚時(shí)約定贈(zèng)與第三人;(3)夫妻共有財(cái)產(chǎn),協(xié)議離婚時(shí)約定將一方所有的份額贈(zèng)與另一方;(4)夫妻共有財(cái)產(chǎn),協(xié)議離婚時(shí)約定贈(zèng)與第三人。第二部分“離婚協(xié)議”中的贈(zèng)與條款與贈(zèng)與合同混淆。通過對(duì)離婚協(xié)議和贈(zèng)與合同的界定,梳理關(guān)于“離婚協(xié)議”中的贈(zèng)與條款性質(zhì)的觀點(diǎn),分析實(shí)務(wù)中將贈(zèng)與條款和贈(zèng)與合同混淆的情況。提出“離婚協(xié)議中約定贈(zèng)與”糾紛中的“離婚協(xié)議”,包涵離婚協(xié)議和贈(zèng)與合同或贈(zèng)與意思表示兩個(gè)部分的內(nèi)容的觀點(diǎn)。第三部分法律適用爭(zhēng)議。探討在“離婚協(xié)議中約定贈(zèng)與”糾紛是適用“合同法”抑或“婚姻法”,贈(zèng)與人可否行使任意撤銷權(quán)?通過對(duì)相關(guān)觀點(diǎn)地梳理,提出四點(diǎn)質(zhì)疑,傾向于該類糾紛適用《合同法》,贈(zèng)與人享有任意撤銷權(quán)。第四部分程序法律問題。分析“離婚協(xié)議中約定贈(zèng)與”糾紛的程序法律問題——案由適用混亂和當(dāng)事人的認(rèn)定。司法實(shí)務(wù)中所適用的案由有撤銷權(quán)糾紛、合同糾紛、婚姻家庭糾紛、離婚后財(cái)產(chǎn)糾紛、物權(quán)確認(rèn)糾紛、析產(chǎn)糾紛以及贈(zèng)與合同糾紛等。當(dāng)涉及受贈(zèng)人為第三人的情形時(shí),易引發(fā)當(dāng)事人的不適格。第五部分司法判定規(guī)則。構(gòu)建“離婚協(xié)議中約定贈(zèng)與”糾紛的司法判定規(guī)則:除“夫妻共有財(cái)產(chǎn),協(xié)議離婚時(shí)約定將一方所有的份額贈(zèng)與另一方”的情形適用夫妻共同財(cái)產(chǎn)分割規(guī)則外,其余三種情形均應(yīng)適用贈(zèng)與合同規(guī)則,贈(zèng)與人享有任意撤銷權(quán)。
[Abstract]:The current marriage concept in our country has undergone profound changes in the last century. In the process of divorce, most couples will choose to register for divorce and sign a divorce agreement for the purpose of relieving marriage relations and getting divorced from the "mire". The divorce agreement of the content of the heart often adds some other terms, which makes the content of the divorce agreement rich. In addition to the purely personal relationship, the content of the property relationship is increased, such as the agreement in the divorce agreement. In judicial practice, more and more cases are dissension due to the agreement of divorce in the divorce agreement. There are no direct legal provisions to follow at present, and the opinions of the people's courts in various places are also inconsistent, and the similar cases have a left judgment. The nature of the agreement in the divorce agreement and the right of free revocation to the giver are also true. In the case of divorce, the divorce agreement signed in the divorce agreement is discussed and discussed. By combining empirical analysis and theoretical analysis, by combing the practical cases, combining the theoretical knowledge of marriage, contract, real right and litigation law, this paper analyzes the judicial decision rules of establishing "the agreement grant in divorce agreement". In addition, the text is divided into five parts, about 2 thousand words. The first part of the question is put forward. The case of the case of a contract dispute between Wang and Wang Guanglin is introduced. The question of the dispute in the "agreement on divorce in the divorce agreement" is introduced. By retrieving the Chinese referee's net, collecting similar cases and making a case analysis table (see Annex I). "The divorce agreement agreement grant" four specific cases of the dispute: (1) one party's personal property, the agreement divorced when the agreement is given to the other party; (2) one party's personal property, the agreement divorce agreed to third people; (3) the husband and wife shared property, the agreement divorce agreed to give the share of the other party to the other party; (4) the husband and wife share property, the agreement of divorce when the divorce Third people agree to give away. The second part of the "divorce agreement" is confused with the gift contract. Through the definition of the divorce agreement and the gift contract, it combs the view of the nature of the gift clause in the "divorce agreement", analyzes the situation of mixing the gift clause and the gift contract in the practice. The "divorce agreement" in the dispute contains the views of two parts of the divorce agreement and the gift contract or the meaning of the gift. The third part of the law applies to the dispute. The discussion of the dispute in the "agreement on divorce" in the "divorce agreement" is the application of "contract law" or "marriage law", and can the donor exercise any revocation right? Through the relevant views Point to the point of combing, put forward four questions, inclined to the application of the "contract law", the donor enjoy the right to arbitrarily revoke. The fourth part of the procedural legal issues. Analysis of the procedural legal issues of the "agreement in divorce agreement" disputes - the case applicable to confusion and the parties' identification. Contract disputes, marital family disputes, property disputes after divorce, property identification disputes, labor analysis disputes and grant contract disputes. When the third person is involved, it is easy to cause the discomfort of the parties. The fifth part of the judicial decision rules. In the case of common property, when the agreement has been agreed to give all the share of one party to the other party when the agreement is divorced, the other three situations shall apply to the rules of the grant contract, and the donor enjoys the right to revoke arbitrarily.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 景龍;;把離婚不離家寫入離婚協(xié)議是否合法[J];農(nóng)家科技;2006年07期

2 莫特;;不平等的離婚協(xié)議當(dāng)然無(wú)效[J];農(nóng)家女;2008年11期

3 付靜;;離婚協(xié)議中遺漏債務(wù)該如何清償?[J];婦女生活;2010年01期

4 ;未登記離婚,離婚協(xié)議也有效嗎[J];伴侶(A版);2010年04期

5 ;離婚協(xié)議中寫明房產(chǎn)留給兒子,頂用嗎[J];伴侶;2012年06期

6 ;辦完離婚手續(xù),還能修改離婚協(xié)議嗎[J];伴侶;2012年12期

7 李欣;;離婚協(xié)議約定將房產(chǎn)贈(zèng)予孩子,離婚后能撤銷嗎？[J];婚育與健康;2013年13期

8 士心;;家庭的破裂有時(shí)無(wú)法避免。離異了——我該怎樣減少對(duì)孩子的傷害[J];家長(zhǎng);2002年Z2期

9 ;這種離婚協(xié)議能反悔嗎?[J];農(nóng)家之友;2003年14期

10 ;這種離婚協(xié)議能反悔嗎?[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)村小康科技;2004年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 蔡大喜;;對(duì)當(dāng)事人訴前離婚協(xié)議效力的確定[A];貴州法學(xué)（總第8期）[C];2014年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 王信玲　　;離婚協(xié)議子女撫養(yǎng)費(fèi)條款的制定[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2012年

2 李可可;離婚協(xié)議中贈(zèng)與條款可否撤銷[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2013年

3 葉蓉;法院應(yīng)受理第三人請(qǐng)求確認(rèn)離婚協(xié)議部分無(wú)效案件[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2001年

4 沈毅;規(guī)范離婚協(xié)議的幾點(diǎn)建議[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)報(bào);2005年

5 顧遠(yuǎn)邋閔長(zhǎng)嶺;離婚協(xié)議里的生死約定是否有效[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

6 佳木邋江南;離婚協(xié)議里的生死約定是否有效[N];民主與法制時(shí)報(bào);2007年

7 本報(bào)記者 林志文　通訊員 王飆塵 胡梯;簽署離婚協(xié)議最忌“口袋條款”[N];中國(guó)婦女報(bào);2009年

8 記者 劉曉星;離婚協(xié)議簽三份究竟哪份作得準(zhǔn)？[N];廣州日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

9 山西辰平律師事務(wù)所律師 郭秀蘭;如何認(rèn)定離婚協(xié)議的效力[N];忻州日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

10 王彪;離婚協(xié)議效力之認(rèn)定[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 何瑤;離婚協(xié)議效力問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

2 周子佩;離婚協(xié)議的效力[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年

3 漆華一;論離婚協(xié)議中約定贈(zèng)與的司法判定[D];西南政法大學(xué);2015年

4 孟剛;論訴前離婚協(xié)議[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

5 孫經(jīng)緯;論訴前離婚協(xié)議的性質(zhì)與效力[D];吉林大學(xué);2009年

6 涂敏;論我國(guó)訴前離婚協(xié)議的性質(zhì)和效力[D];華中科技大學(xué);2011年

7 裴舟;論訴前離婚協(xié)議[D];大連海事大學(xué);2012年

8 呂一平;訴前離婚協(xié)議的性質(zhì)和效力[D];大連海事大學(xué);2014年

9 李志敏;離婚協(xié)議中贈(zèng)與條款的效力[D];西南政法大學(xué);2013年

10 朱佩佩;論我國(guó)協(xié)議離婚中離婚協(xié)議的性質(zhì)與效力[D];西南政法大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1902108