本文選題：配偶權(quán)制度 + 構(gòu)建��； 參考：《中央民族大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：眾所周知,家庭是社會(huì)的細(xì)胞,夫妻是構(gòu)成家庭最基本的要素,它是社會(huì)中最基本的倫理關(guān)系,配偶權(quán)是調(diào)整夫妻關(guān)系的權(quán)利,因此對(duì)調(diào)整夫妻關(guān)系的配偶權(quán)的研究,不僅關(guān)系到夫妻雙方的利益,而且也關(guān)系到整個(gè)家庭的利益,進(jìn)而影響到整個(gè)社會(huì)的和諧和穩(wěn)定。配偶權(quán)是一種身份權(quán)是由早期的夫權(quán)演變而來,但是隨著歷史的發(fā)展配偶權(quán)有了新的含義,它是建立在男女平等的基礎(chǔ)上的,擺脫了封建傳統(tǒng)思想對(duì)女性的束縛的權(quán)利,它賦予了女性同男性一樣在婚姻中平等的權(quán)利。從配偶權(quán)的內(nèi)部來講夫妻雙方互相享有配偶權(quán),一方享有權(quán)利另一方就要承擔(dān)相應(yīng)的義務(wù),是夫妻之間權(quán)利和義務(wù)的綜合體；從配偶權(quán)的外部來說夫妻是一個(gè)整體,任何人都負(fù)有不得侵犯的義務(wù)。國(guó)外許多國(guó)家在本國(guó)的立法中已經(jīng)明確了配偶權(quán)的概念,并且相關(guān)的制度也比較完善,但是在我國(guó)關(guān)于是否要設(shè)立配偶權(quán)還存有很大的爭(zhēng)議。因此,本文主要從婚姻法的基本理論和現(xiàn)行法律法規(guī)出發(fā),對(duì)配偶權(quán)的相關(guān)內(nèi)容進(jìn)行探討,并進(jìn)一步探析對(duì)配偶權(quán)的法律保護(hù)問題。 本文包括導(dǎo)論、正文、結(jié)語三部分,其中正文分為三章。 導(dǎo)論主要闡述了本文的選題背景及研究意義、研究相關(guān)動(dòng)態(tài)、研究思路及方法。 第一章配偶權(quán)制度概述。從配偶權(quán)的內(nèi)涵與配偶權(quán)制度的歷史沿革入手,簡(jiǎn)要介紹學(xué)術(shù)界有關(guān)配偶權(quán)概念的不同觀點(diǎn),進(jìn)一步分析配偶權(quán)的法律性質(zhì),并對(duì)配偶權(quán)各項(xiàng)具體權(quán)利逐一進(jìn)行分析介紹,同時(shí)對(duì)配偶權(quán)行使的基本原則略加陳述,并表明了筆者對(duì)配偶權(quán)制度的價(jià)值立場(chǎng)。 第二章配偶權(quán)制度設(shè)立的必要性和可行性。認(rèn)為配偶權(quán)的設(shè)立有利于維護(hù)婚姻的根本宗旨——權(quán)利和義務(wù)的一致性；有利于維護(hù)平等、和睦、文明的社會(huì)主義婚姻家庭關(guān)系；有利于保護(hù)婦女合法權(quán)利。同時(shí)通過對(duì)國(guó)外部分國(guó)家和我國(guó)港、澳、臺(tái)地區(qū)關(guān)于配偶權(quán)的相關(guān)立法的闡述及評(píng)析,從比較法的角度觀察、研討,借鑒與學(xué)習(xí)外國(guó)法律與判例之合理內(nèi)核,做到“洋為中用”。 第三章構(gòu)建我國(guó)配偶權(quán)制度的思考。作為全文的核心,該部分從我國(guó)有關(guān)配偶權(quán)的現(xiàn)狀及缺陷入手,著重從民法典親屬篇應(yīng)當(dāng)建立配偶權(quán)制度、我國(guó)法定配偶權(quán)的主要內(nèi)容、建立侵害配偶權(quán)的救濟(jì)制度三方面進(jìn)行分析探討,在配偶權(quán)應(yīng)否法定等學(xué)界分歧的問題上提出作者不成熟之觀點(diǎn),同時(shí)主張建立婚內(nèi)過錯(cuò)賠償?shù)扰渑紮?quán)救濟(jì)制度。 結(jié)語對(duì)論文寫作進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)要回顧,對(duì)配偶權(quán)制度的發(fā)展前景進(jìn)行展望。
[Abstract]:As we all know, the family is the cell of the society, and husband and wife are the most basic elements of the family. It is the most basic ethical relationship in the society, and the right of spouse is the right to adjust the relationship between husband and wife. Therefore, the study on the right of spouse to adjust the relationship between husband and wife. It concerns not only the interests of both husband and wife, but also the interests of the whole family, thus affecting the harmony and stability of the whole society. The right of spouse is a kind of right of identity evolved from the early right of husband, but with the development of history, the right of spouse has a new meaning, which is based on equality between men and women, and gets rid of the right of bondage of the feudal traditional thought to women. It gives women equal rights in marriage with men. From the internal perspective of the spouse right, the husband and wife enjoy the spouse right to each other. One party enjoys the right and the other party must bear the corresponding obligations, which is the combination of the rights and obligations between the husband and the wife. From the external perspective of the spouse right, the husband and wife are a whole. Everyone has an inviolable obligation. Many foreign countries have defined the concept of the right of spouse in their own legislation, and the relevant system is relatively perfect, but there is still a lot of controversy about whether to set up the right of spouse in our country. Therefore, this paper mainly from the basic theory of marriage law and current laws and regulations, to explore the relevant content of spouse rights, and further explore the legal protection of spouse rights. This paper includes three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which the text is divided into three chapters. The introduction mainly describes the background and significance of this paper, research trends, research ideas and methods. Chapter one summarizes the system of spouse right. Starting with the connotation of the spouse right and the historical evolution of the spouse right system, this paper briefly introduces the different viewpoints of the academic circles on the concept of the spouse right, further analyzes the legal nature of the spouse right, and analyzes and introduces each specific right of the spouse right one by one. At the same time, the basic principle of the exercise of the right of spouse is briefly stated, and the author's position on the value of the system of the right of spouse is indicated. The second chapter is the necessity and feasibility of the establishment of spouse right system. It is considered that the establishment of the right of spouse is conducive to the maintenance of the basic tenet of marriage, the consistency of rights and obligations, the maintenance of equal, harmonious and civilized socialist marriage and family relations, and the protection of women's legal rights. At the same time, through the elaboration and analysis of the relevant legislation on spouse right in some foreign countries and in Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan of China, from the perspective of comparative law, we can observe, discuss, learn from and learn from the reasonable core of foreign laws and precedents. Be sure to "make foreign things work". The third chapter constructs our country spouse right system ponder. As the core of the full text, this part starts with the present situation and defects of the right of spouse in China, emphasizes on the establishment of the system of the right of spouse in the relative part of the Civil Code, and the main contents of the legal right of spouse in our country. This paper analyzes and discusses the three aspects of the remedy system for infringement of spouse right, puts forward the author's immature viewpoint on whether the spouse right should be legalized or not, and advocates the establishment of the relief system of spouse right such as compensation for marital fault. The conclusion gives a brief review of the writing of the thesis and prospects for the development of the right of spouse system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中央民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D923.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周莎;;論我國(guó)配偶權(quán)的現(xiàn)狀及其完善[J];成都行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期

2 陳玉玲;論配偶權(quán)中夫妻同居義務(wù)與忠實(shí)義務(wù)[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年04期

3 丁素芳;試論配偶權(quán)[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

4 義瑛;配偶權(quán)的擴(kuò)張與限制[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年04期

5 高洪賓;配偶權(quán)初探[J];法律適用;2000年08期

6 韓松;;婚姻權(quán)及其侵權(quán)責(zé)任初探[J];中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1993年03期

7 王利明;婚姻法修改中的若干問題[J];法學(xué);2001年03期

8 張婷婷;;婚姻法中配偶權(quán)的界定[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年02期

9 裴寶莉;;配偶權(quán)在我國(guó)確立的利弊分析[J];北華航天工業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

10 王勇民,覃事宏;論婚姻法中創(chuàng)設(shè)配偶權(quán)的局限性[J];華中科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 趙東斌;[N];解放軍報(bào);2001年

，

本文編號(hào)：1824945