本文選題：監(jiān)護(hù)制度　切入點(diǎn)：未成年人　出處：《暨南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：監(jiān)護(hù)制度最早可追溯至羅馬法,隨著不斷的發(fā)展,已成為現(xiàn)代民法中一項(xiàng)完善的法律制度。監(jiān)護(hù)制度的核心是保護(hù)未成年人的合法權(quán)益,我國現(xiàn)階段已構(gòu)建了一套頗具中國特色的未成年人監(jiān)護(hù)制度,但是明顯滯后于國外未成年人法的現(xiàn)代變革�，F(xiàn)今我國未成年人合法權(quán)益受到侵害的事件屢屢發(fā)生,未成年人監(jiān)護(hù)制度的缺失是其一重要因素,對此完善我國未成年人監(jiān)護(hù)制度有其現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。本文總共三部分。第一部分通過對我國監(jiān)護(hù)制度進(jìn)行了解,對在保護(hù)未成年人權(quán)益和維護(hù)社會(huì)秩序的價(jià)值予以肯定,同時(shí)提出其在指導(dǎo)思想上落后,帶有歷史局限性,不能有效的指導(dǎo)未成人民事權(quán)益保護(hù)事業(yè)的開展;在立法體例上未區(qū)分親權(quán),導(dǎo)致存在諸多法律空白的出現(xiàn);在監(jiān)督機(jī)制上缺失,導(dǎo)致實(shí)施效果堪憂。第二部分是針對上文提出的問題進(jìn)行對比研究,評析德國和日本的未成年人監(jiān)護(hù)制度在其指導(dǎo)思想、立法模式和監(jiān)督機(jī)制的優(yōu)越性及可借鑒經(jīng)驗(yàn);第三部分是完善我國未成年人監(jiān)護(hù)制度的具體思考,首先在指導(dǎo)思想上確立“兒童利益最佳”原則,其次在在立法上采用以親權(quán)為主、監(jiān)護(hù)為輔的立法模式,最后是完善監(jiān)督機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:Guardianship system can be traced back to Roman law. With the development of modern civil law, it has become a perfect legal system.The core of guardianship system is to protect the legitimate rights and interests of minors. At present, China has constructed a set of minors' guardianship system with Chinese characteristics, but obviously lags behind the modern reform of foreign minors' laws.Nowadays, the violation of the legal rights and interests of minors occurs frequently in our country, and the absence of guardianship system for minors is one of the important factors, which has practical significance to improve the guardianship system of minors in our country.There are three parts in this paper.The first part, through understanding the guardianship system of our country, affirms the value of protecting the rights and interests of minors and maintaining social order, and points out that it is backward in guiding ideology and has historical limitations.Can not effectively guide the development of non-adult civil rights and interests protection; do not distinguish parental rights in the legislative style, resulting in the existence of many legal gaps; in the absence of supervision mechanism, resulting in poor implementation results.The second part is a comparative study on the problems raised above, and comments on the advantages of the German and Japanese juvenile guardianship system in its guiding ideology, legislative model and supervision mechanism, as well as the experience that can be used for reference.The third part is to perfect our country minor guardianship system concrete thought, first establishes "the child benefit best" principle in the guiding ideology, secondly in the legislation uses the parental authority primarily, the guardianship as the supplementary legislation pattern.Finally, improve the supervision mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 朱紅梅;;監(jiān)護(hù)的公法化:德國未成年人國家監(jiān)護(hù)制度對我國的啟示[J];太原師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年06期

2 陳葦,謝京杰;論“兒童最大利益優(yōu)先原則”在我國的確立——兼論《婚姻法》等相關(guān)法律的不足及其完善[J];法商研究;2005年05期

3 欒義娟;;保護(hù)“留守兒童”權(quán)益 完善委托監(jiān)護(hù)立法[J];青年探索;2007年02期

4 吳國平;魏敏;;監(jiān)護(hù)概念與性質(zhì)辨析[J];江南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年05期

5 張國元;完善未成年人監(jiān)護(hù)制度的法律思考[J];西南民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年09期

6 夏吟蘭,高蕾;建立我國的親權(quán)制度[J];中華女子學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

7 吳用;;人權(quán)保護(hù)對國際未成年人監(jiān)護(hù)法律制度的影響[J];中國青年政治學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 中國青少年犯罪研究會(huì)副秘書長、青少年法律援助與研究中心主任 佟麗華;[N];法制日報(bào);2002年

，

本文編號：1704703