本文關(guān)鍵詞：共同遺囑制度研究　出處：《內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 共同遺囑 撤銷權(quán) 遺囑效力

【摘要】：遺囑繼承作為與法定繼承相對(duì)應(yīng)的一種繼承形式,是我國(guó)《繼承法》的重要組成部分,在我國(guó)財(cái)產(chǎn)繼承制度中占有重要的法律地位,隨著社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)生活的發(fā)展,人們社會(huì)財(cái)富的增加,遺囑意識(shí)的增強(qiáng),通過(guò)遺囑處分自己的財(cái)產(chǎn)成為公民越來(lái)越熱衷的處理遺產(chǎn)方式,尤其是近年來(lái),共同遺囑在現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中的廣泛使用已成為不可逆轉(zhuǎn)的趨勢(shì),然而我國(guó)繼承法律制度對(duì)此制度的忽視以及理論界莫衷一是的態(tài)度,導(dǎo)致共同遺囑案件的糾紛訴至法院時(shí),法院認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不一,有的承認(rèn)共同遺囑的效力,有的則予以否認(rèn),然而無(wú)可否認(rèn)的是,隨著民間對(duì)共同遺囑形式的大量采用,共同遺囑制度成為了繼承法律制度中一個(gè)凸顯的問(wèn)題,這加劇了我國(guó)《繼承法》對(duì)其規(guī)制的緊迫性,以便能夠?yàn)閷?shí)踐操作提供向?qū)�。因�?本文從兩個(gè)具體的共同遺囑糾紛案例入手,逐步對(duì)共同遺囑的概念、特征以及類型進(jìn)行剖析,借鑒外國(guó)對(duì)共同遺囑效力的認(rèn)定,在兼聽(tīng)各方觀點(diǎn)的基礎(chǔ)上,針對(duì)我國(guó)《繼承法》上對(duì)共同遺囑制度規(guī)定的不足,在共同遺囑的主體、內(nèi)容、效力、撤銷和變更等方面提出自己的構(gòu)建設(shè)想,以期能夠?yàn)槲覈?guó)共同遺囑制度的構(gòu)建和完善貢獻(xiàn)自己的一份微薄之力。具體來(lái)說(shuō),論文分為五個(gè)部分：第一部分從兩個(gè)具體的共同遺囑糾紛案例入手,提出共同遺囑制度所涉及的一系列問(wèn)題；第二部分是關(guān)于共同遺囑的概述,介紹了共同遺囑的概念、特征和類型,并明確提出本文所要探討的共同遺囑僅指實(shí)質(zhì)意義上的共同遺囑；第三部分是對(duì)共同遺囑的域外法考察,主要是介紹了國(guó)外關(guān)于共同遺囑的肯定、否定兩種立法例,并對(duì)這兩種立法例進(jìn)行比較分析得出外國(guó)立法之所以有所差異的原因；第四部分在分析我國(guó)共同遺囑的立法、司法現(xiàn)狀的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合我國(guó)理論界對(duì)這一問(wèn)題的激烈探討,對(duì)我國(guó)設(shè)立共同遺囑制度的必要性和可行性進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)的闡述；第五部分主要從共同遺囑適用主體和客體；共同遺囑的形式、內(nèi)容限制；共同遺囑的變更、撤銷以及共同遺囑的效力方面,對(duì)我國(guó)的共同遺囑制度提出具體構(gòu)建完善建議,以適應(yīng)遺囑現(xiàn)狀的發(fā)展,使社會(huì)更加和諧。
[Abstract]:Testamentary succession, as a form of inheritance corresponding to legal inheritance, is an important part of China's inheritance Law. It occupies an important legal position in the property inheritance system of our country, and along with the development of social and economic life. With the increase of social wealth and the increase of testamentary consciousness, disposition of one's own property through will has become a more and more enthusiastic way of handling inheritance, especially in recent years. The widespread use of common will in real life has become an irreversible trend, however, the inheritance legal system of our country ignores this system and the theory of different attitudes. When the dispute leading to the case of common will is appealed to the court, the court finds that the standard is different, some of them admit the validity of the common will, some deny it, but what is undeniable is that. With the widespread adoption of the common will form, the common will system has become a prominent problem in the inheritance legal system, which intensifies the urgency of the regulation of the inheritance Law in our country. In order to provide a guide for practical operation. Therefore, this paper from two specific cases of common will disputes, gradually analyze the concept, characteristics and types of common will. Drawing lessons from foreign countries on the determination of the validity of the common will, on the basis of listening to the views of the parties, aiming at the deficiencies of the common will system in the inheritance Law of our country, the main body, content and effect of the common will. In order to make a contribution to the construction and perfection of our common will system, the author puts forward his own idea of construction in the aspects of revocation and alteration. Specifically, it can contribute to the construction and improvement of our common will system. The paper is divided into five parts: the first part from two specific cases of common will disputes, put forward the common will system involved in a series of issues; The second part is an overview of the common will, introduces the concept, characteristics and types of the common will, and clearly points out that the common will to be discussed in this paper only refers to the essence of the common will; The third part is the extraterritorial investigation of the common will, mainly introduces the affirmation of the common will and the negation of the two kinds of legislation. And the comparative analysis of the two kinds of legislation cases shows the reasons for the difference of foreign legislation; In the 4th part, on the basis of analyzing the legislation and judicial status of our common will, combined with the theoretical circle of our country, this problem is discussed intensely. The necessity and feasibility of establishing the common will system in China are expounded systematically. Part 5th mainly applies to the subject and object of the common will; The form and content of the common will; In the aspect of the change of common will, revocation and the effect of common will, the author puts forward some concrete suggestions on the construction of common will system in our country, in order to adapt to the development of the present situation of will and make the society more harmonious.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳丹;;論我國(guó)繼承特留份制度之構(gòu)建——以臺(tái)灣地區(qū)立法為鑒[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年10期

2 睢素利;單國(guó)軍;;共同遺囑的法律效力研析[J];成人高教學(xué)刊;2008年04期

3 吳國(guó)平;;夫妻共同遺囑的效力及其立法建議[J];福建江夏學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期

4 柏文棟,陳明霞;共同遺囑若干問(wèn)題探討[J];法律適用;2000年10期

5 麻昌華,曹詩(shī)權(quán);共同遺囑的認(rèn)定與建構(gòu)[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1999年01期

6 劉道云;;共同遺囑我國(guó)《繼承法》應(yīng)否定[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬);2010年04期

7 郭越;夫妻共同遺囑質(zhì)疑[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2000年01期

8 徐振增;趙雅琨;;論遺囑自由之限制與我國(guó)繼承法的完善[J];前沿;2010年10期

9 魯曉明;;共同遺囑上的兩難抉擇及其立法應(yīng)對(duì)[J];廣東商學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

10 李海松;遺囑自由的展開(kāi)與限制——從羅馬法到現(xiàn)代法[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 于志強(qiáng) 蘇家成;[N];人民法院報(bào);2003年

，

本文編號(hào)：1361558