發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-18 19:22

【摘要】： 利益衡量是常用的司法方法之一,美國(guó)和日本等國(guó)家環(huán)境侵權(quán)民事司法中的利益衡量運(yùn)用較好且積累了很多有益經(jīng)驗(yàn),國(guó)內(nèi)環(huán)境法學(xué)界對(duì)環(huán)境侵權(quán)民事司法中利益衡量問(wèn)題的研究較少,而我國(guó)相關(guān)司法實(shí)踐急需理論指導(dǎo)。對(duì)我國(guó)環(huán)境侵權(quán)民事司法中的利益衡量問(wèn)題進(jìn)行研究需要解決以下一些基本理論問(wèn)題:①“利益衡量”在何種背景下出現(xiàn)的?利益衡量的含義是什么?環(huán)境侵權(quán)民事司法中的利益衡量有何獨(dú)特性?②從比較法層面來(lái)看,環(huán)境侵權(quán)民事司法中利益衡量運(yùn)用較好的國(guó)家,如美國(guó)、日本,有哪些有益的經(jīng)驗(yàn)?③我國(guó)環(huán)境侵權(quán)民事司法中的利益衡量有何缺陷?④如何完善我國(guó)環(huán)境侵權(quán)民事司法中的利益衡量?等等。 文章采用比較分析、案例分析、邏輯推理、規(guī)范分析、經(jīng)濟(jì)分析、語(yǔ)義分析、歷史分析、實(shí)證分析等方法對(duì)上述問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了初淺的探討,闡述了利益衡量出現(xiàn)的背景,辨析了與利益衡量有關(guān)的不同稱謂,重新界定了利益衡量的概念,分析了環(huán)境侵權(quán)民事司法中利益衡量的獨(dú)特性,考察了美國(guó)和日本環(huán)境侵權(quán)民事司法中利益衡量的經(jīng)驗(yàn),分析了我國(guó)環(huán)境侵權(quán)民事司法中利益衡量的問(wèn)題,認(rèn)為我國(guó)法官處理環(huán)境案件時(shí)存在有如法官應(yīng)用利益衡量的宏觀思維定位不佳、忽視經(jīng)濟(jì)效率分析思維的運(yùn)用等問(wèn)題,針對(duì)這些問(wèn)題,在借鑒美國(guó)和日本相關(guān)經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上,提出了完善我國(guó)環(huán)境侵權(quán)民事司法利益衡量的建議。
[Abstract]:Interest measurement is one of the commonly used judicial methods. In the civil justice of environmental tort such as the United States and Japan, the interest measurement is well used and has accumulated a lot of useful experience. There is little research on the measurement of interests in environmental tort civil justice in domestic environmental law circles, but the relevant judicial practice in our country is in urgent need of theoretical guidance. To study the problem of interest measurement in the civil justice of environmental tort in China, we need to solve the following basic theoretical problems: (1) under what background does "interest measurement" occur? What is the meaning of interest measurement? What is the uniqueness of interest measurement in environmental tort civil justice? (2) from the perspective of comparative law, the countries that use better interest measurement in environmental tort civil justice, such as the United States and Japan, What are the beneficial experiences? (3) what are the shortcomings of the interest measurement in the environmental tort civil justice in China? 4. How to perfect the interest measurement in the environmental tort civil justice in our country? Wait This paper discusses the above problems by means of comparative analysis, case analysis, logical reasoning, normative analysis, economic analysis, semantic analysis, historical analysis and empirical analysis, and expounds the background of interest measurement. This paper analyzes the different appellations related to interest measurement, redefines the concept of interest measurement, analyzes the uniqueness of interest measurement in environmental tort civil justice, and examines the experience of interest measurement in environmental tort civil justice in the United States and Japan. This paper analyzes the problems of interest measurement in the civil justice of environmental tort in our country, and points out that there are some problems in our country's judges' handling of environmental cases, such as the poor positioning of macroscopic thinking of judges' application of interest measurement, the neglect of the use of economic efficiency analysis thinking, and so on. In view of these problems, based on the relevant experiences of the United States and Japan, this paper puts forward some suggestions to improve the measurement of the civil judicial interests of environmental tort in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號(hào)】：D922.68;D923

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 楊歡;我國(guó)水污染侵權(quán)民事救濟(jì)制度研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2010年

2 周銳;從環(huán)境法理念看環(huán)境司法中法官的法律解釋[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2011年

3 蔣文玉;利益衡量方法在我國(guó)環(huán)境侵權(quán)案件中的適用研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2280128