本文選題：溯及力 + 損害賠償��； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：合同解除制度最早可追溯于古羅馬法，它的發(fā)展與變化也是民法理念的發(fā)展和變遷。作為合同法中最重要的制度之一，其越來(lái)越受到各國(guó)立法和理論的重視。民法雖為萬(wàn)法之母，但隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)和社會(huì)制度的發(fā)展，如今也面臨著許多挑戰(zhàn)和爭(zhēng)議。合同解除制度也不例外，尤其對(duì)于合同解除后所產(chǎn)生的法律效果，無(wú)論是各國(guó)立法，還是理論學(xué)說(shuō)均未能達(dá)成統(tǒng)一。合同解除后的法律效果主要體現(xiàn)為，合同解除后會(huì)給當(dāng)事人業(yè)已形成的合同權(quán)利義務(wù)帶來(lái)怎么樣的變化，如解除行為對(duì)于解除之前已經(jīng)履行的義務(wù)是否需要恢復(fù)原狀；以及守約方因合同解除所遭受的損失是否可以主張損害賠償?shù)取１疚闹饕扇×吮容^分析法，對(duì)世界先進(jìn)立法和理論進(jìn)行比較，并結(jié)合我國(guó)的立法和實(shí)踐進(jìn)行討論，希望能對(duì)合同解除制度進(jìn)行一定的梳理。 第一部分是對(duì)合同解除法律效果的溯及力分析。本部分在比較分析各國(guó)立法例及理論學(xué)說(shuō)的基礎(chǔ)上，，對(duì)合同解除的溯及力問(wèn)題展開(kāi)討論。因合同解除后往往會(huì)產(chǎn)生恢復(fù)原狀的義務(wù)，兩者具有緊密的聯(lián)系，故本文對(duì)恢復(fù)原狀的基本理論問(wèn)題也進(jìn)行了分析。 第二部分是對(duì)合同解除法律效果的損害賠償分析。本部分介紹了各國(guó)關(guān)于合同解除后損害賠償?shù)牧⒎ɡ�，討論分析合同解除損害賠償?shù)恼?qǐng)求權(quán)基礎(chǔ)理論，在這個(gè)基礎(chǔ)上試圖對(duì)損害賠償?shù)姆秶龀龃笾碌慕缍ā?br/>[Abstract]:The system of rescission of contract can be traced back to ancient Roman law, and its development and change is also the development and change of the concept of civil law. As one of the most important systems in contract law, it has been paid more and more attention by legislation and theory. Although civil law is the mother of ten thousand laws, with the development of economic base and social system, it also faces many challenges and controversies. The system of rescission of contract is no exception, especially for the legal effect produced by the termination of contract, neither the legislation nor the theory of each country has been unified. The legal effect after the termination of the contract is mainly reflected in: how to change the contractual rights and obligations that the parties have already formed after the termination of the contract, such as whether the discharge act should be restored to the original state for the obligations already performed before the dissolution; As well as the contract termination of the contract suffered by the party can claim damages and so on. This article mainly adopts the comparative analysis method, carries on the comparison to the world advanced legislation and the theory, and unifies our country's legislation and the practice carries on the discussion, hoped can carry on the certain comb to the contract rescission system. The first part is the retroactive analysis of the legal effect of rescission of contract. This part discusses the retroactive effect of contract termination on the basis of comparative analysis of legislative cases and theoretical theories in various countries. Since the obligation of restitution often arises after the termination of the contract, the two are closely related, so the basic theoretical problems of restitution are also analyzed in this paper. The second part is the damage compensation analysis of the legal effect of rescission of contract. This part introduces the legislative examples of compensation for damages after termination of contract, discusses and analyzes the basic theory of the right to claim compensation for rescission of contract, and tries to make a rough definition of the scope of compensation for damages on this basis.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 袁小梁;析合同解除的三點(diǎn)爭(zhēng)議[J];法律適用;2004年02期

2 湯印明,鄒開(kāi)亮;也探合同解除效力[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年03期

3 陽(yáng)子龍;論合同解除后損害賠償?shù)恼?qǐng)求權(quán)基礎(chǔ)[J];前沿;2004年09期

4 蔡立東;論合同解除制度的重構(gòu)[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2001年05期

5 李克武;論可得利益及其違約賠償——兼評(píng)《合同法》第113條[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年06期

6 崔建遠(yuǎn);解除權(quán)問(wèn)題的疑問(wèn)與釋答(下篇)[J];政治與法律;2005年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 趙建偉;合同賠償責(zé)任制度研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2002年

2 孫娜娜;合同解除與損害賠償研究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2005年

3 鄧葉芬;合同解除的溯及力研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2006年

本文編號(hào)：2051098