本文選題：工程款優(yōu)先受償權(quán) + 建設(shè)者留置權(quán)��； 參考：《建筑經(jīng)濟》2005年08期

【摘要】：工程款層層拖欠,嚴(yán)重侵犯了承包企業(yè)的合法權(quán)利。為了保障承包商得到工程款支付,我國合同法確立了工程款優(yōu)先受償權(quán)制度,美國財產(chǎn)法規(guī)定了建設(shè)者的留置權(quán)制度。本文在介紹美國建設(shè)者留置權(quán)制度的同時,從法律視角對兩種權(quán)利的行使和放棄兩大方面進行深入對比分析,得出結(jié)論我國工程款優(yōu)先受償權(quán)并不能有效保障承包商,尤其是分包商和勞務(wù)工人的利益,應(yīng)當(dāng)大力借鑒美國建設(shè)者留置權(quán)制度,從而使工程款拖欠這一市場頑疾得到有效遏制。
[Abstract]:The project money is in arrears, which seriously infringes the legal rights of the contracting enterprise. In order to guarantee the contractor to get the payment of the project money, the contract law of our country established the system of the priority right of payment of the project payment, and the American property law stipulated the system of lien of the constructor. This paper introduces the American constructor lien system and makes a deep comparative analysis on the exercise and abandonment of the two rights from the legal angle of view, and draws a conclusion that the priority right of payment of engineering funds in our country can not effectively protect the contractor. Especially the interests of subcontractors and labor workers should draw lessons from American constructor lien system so as to effectively curb the market malady of defaulting on construction money.
【作者單位】： 清華大學(xué)建設(shè)管理系 清華大學(xué)建設(shè)管理系
【分類號】：D913

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李德全;對于工程擔(dān)保、保險法律規(guī)定的政策建議[J];建筑經(jīng)濟;2004年01期

2 唐敏;工程擔(dān)保:國際慣例中國小試牛刀[J];w，

本文編號：1894824