本文選題：根本違約 + 聯(lián)合國國際貨物銷售合同公約　； 參考：《南昌大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：根本違約制度起源于英國普通法,后對美國合同法產生了重大影響,1980年《聯(lián)合國國際貨物銷售合同公約》、歐盟制定的《歐洲合同法原則》和1994年國際私法協(xié)會《國際商事合同通則》都對根本違約制度進行了規(guī)定,從而使其具有了更深遠的意義和影響。該制度不僅在國際貿易中處于非常重要的地位,對各國合同法的理論和實踐影響也越來越大,已經或直接或間接的體現在各國合同立法中,但是由于各國內法和國際立法都只是對根本違約的構成作了抽象性的規(guī)定,就連《聯(lián)合國國際貨物銷售合同公約》第二十五條對根本違約作的定義也因其語言的高度概括性,在實踐中引發(fā)了許多爭議。例如：關于“處于相同情況中一個同等資格、通情達理的人”如何確定,在結合具體案件中如何認定同等資格、通情達理?“可預見性”時間的確立標準?“損害”的確切含義?等等的不明確都使其在貿易實踐中帶來許多問題和不便。 另外,我國作為《聯(lián)合國國際貨物銷售合同公約》的締約國,在合同法中體現根本違約制度的實質內容,為我國的合同解除提供了更科學合理的法定事由。但是由于還存在諸多問題,其在國內的適用難免有一些不足,這也是我們亟待完善的地方。總之,根本違約制度作為一種解除合同的法定事由,一方面既是保護受害方利益的體現,另一方面實際上是對行使合同解除權進行了非常必要地限制。我國新《合同法》對該制度的規(guī)定和完善,不僅豐富和充實了我國的合同法制，還促進了我國立法在這一問題上與國際法制的接軌。
[Abstract]:The system of fundamental breach of contract originates from the common law of England, The 1980 United Nations Convention on contracts for the International Sale of goods, the principles of European contract Law formulated by the European Union and the 1994 Unidroit principles of International Commercial contracts have all caused fundamental breach of contract. The system is regulated, So that it has a more profound significance and impact. This system is not only in a very important position in international trade, but also has more and more influence on the theory and practice of the contract law of various countries, which has been directly or indirectly embodied in the national contract legislation. However, as each domestic law and international legislation only make abstract provisions on the constitution of fundamental breach of contract, even the definition of fundamental breach of contract in Article 25 of the United Nations Convention on contracts for the International Sale of goods is also due to its highly general language. In practice, there has been a lot of controversy. For example, how is it determined that "an equally qualified, reasonable person in the same situation", and how to determine the same qualification in a specific case, is reasonable? What are the criteria for "predictability" time? What is the exact meaning of "damage"? The ambiguity makes it bring many problems and inconveniences in the trade practice. In addition, as a contracting state of the United Nations Convention on contracts for the International Sale of goods, China embodies the essential content of the fundamental breach of contract system in the contract law, which provides a more scientific and reasonable legal reason for the termination of the contract in our country. However, because there are still many problems, its application in China inevitably has some shortcomings, which is also our urgent need to improve. In a word, the fundamental breach of contract system, as a legal reason for rescission of contract, is not only the embodiment of protecting the interests of the injured party, but also the very necessary restriction on the exercise of the right to rescind the contract on the other hand. The regulation and perfection of this system in the new contract Law of China not only enriches and enriches the legal system of contract in our country, but also promotes the integration of our legislation with the international legal system on this issue.
【學位授予單位】：南昌大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王守祥,陳仲;根本違約制度研究[J];阿壩師范高等專科學校學報;2001年01期

2 李先波,陳楊;根本違約構成要件探析[J];湖南社會科學;2005年05期

3 袁鈺菲;;論CISG中根本違約制度的認定標準[J];法制與經濟(下旬刊);2010年01期

4 劉靖;;論根本違約構成要件及其法律效果[J];法制與社會;2007年02期

5 常翠;;淺談根本違約制度[J];法制與社會;2008年32期

6 陳群;陳泉;;根本違約與合同解除[J];法制與社會;2009年01期

7 任濤;;根本違約制度探析[J];北方經貿;2006年12期

8 周新軍;關于根本違約及其與大陸法系相關違約形態(tài)的比較研究和思考[J];河北法學;2004年07期

9 征國忠;根本違約的認定及救濟[J];哈爾濱學院學報;2005年09期

10 宋杰;張志彥;;論《國際商事合同通則》在CISG解釋中的運用——以根本違約的解釋為例[J];黑龍江對外經貿;2008年06期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 全魁勝;根本違約的構成要件及法律后果[D];武漢大學;2004年

2 莊謙德;根本違約制度研究[D];暨南大學;2007年

，

本文編號：1855417