本文選題：無權(quán)處分 + 善意取得�。� 參考：《西北大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國民法學(xué)界對于《合同法》第五十一條規(guī)定的無權(quán)處分行為的效力問題存在著極大的爭議。本文首先從各個理論關(guān)于無權(quán)處分概念的界定有所不同出發(fā),在對無權(quán)處分不同概念的理解基礎(chǔ)之上,形成了世界上不同的物權(quán)變動模式,一是債權(quán)意思主義的物權(quán)變動模式,二是物權(quán)形式主義的物權(quán)變動模式,三是債權(quán)形式主義的物權(quán)變動模式。對這些不同的物權(quán)變動模式通過比較法的研究,得出我國立法上堅持選擇債權(quán)形式主義的物權(quán)變動模式,在這一前提下,分析我國關(guān)于無權(quán)處分行為效力的各個學(xué)說,以證明在無權(quán)處分情況下之債權(quán)合同有效所具有的優(yōu)越性,從而提出本文的觀點：我國無權(quán)處分的效力是在堅持債權(quán)形式主義的物權(quán)變動模式下債權(quán)合同的有效,以使無權(quán)處分制度發(fā)揮其本來應(yīng)有的功能。另外,無權(quán)處分不僅是合同法上的爭議問題,同時也涉及物權(quán)法上的善意取得制度。本文從無權(quán)處分和善意取得制度之間互相協(xié)調(diào)的角度,論證了債權(quán)合同有效以及交付或者登記行為的公示公信力應(yīng)該為協(xié)調(diào)兩者關(guān)系的關(guān)鍵,并據(jù)此認為善意取得的性質(zhì)應(yīng)為繼受取得。
[Abstract]:There are great disputes in the civil law circles of our country about the validity of the unauthorized disposition of the fifty-first provisions of the contract law. Firstly, this article begins with the different definitions of the concept of unauthorized disposition, and forms the different mode of real right change in the world on the basis of the understanding of the different concepts of the unauthorized disposition. The two is the change mode of real right in real right formalism, and the three is the change mode of the right of claim formalism, and the study of these different modes of real right change through the comparative law shows that the mode of the change of real right of the creditor's rights formalism is chosen in the legislation of our country, and on this premise, the analysis of me The various doctrines on the effectiveness of unauthorized disposition to prove the superiority of the validity of the creditor's right contract under the circumstances of the unauthorized disposition, thus put forward the view of this article that the validity of the unauthorized disposition in our country is to make the system of the unauthorized disposition the validity of the creditor's right in the mode of the change of the right of right in the form of the formalism of the creditor's rights. In addition, the unauthorized disposition is not only a dispute on the law of the contract, but also the good faith acquisition system in the property law. From the angle of coordination between the unauthorized disposition and the bona fide acquisition system, this paper demonstrates that the public credibility of the validity of the contract and the act of delivery or registration should be the key to the coordination of the relationship between the two. According to this, the nature of bona fide acquisition should be acquired.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 李琴聲;論無權(quán)處分[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年04期

2 孫憲忠;物權(quán)行為理論探源及其意義[J];法學(xué)研究;1996年03期

3 崔建遠;無權(quán)處分辨——合同法第51條規(guī)定的解釋與適用[J];法學(xué)研究;2003年01期

4 吳國U，

本文編號：1852944