本文選題：航次租船 + 合同　； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：在航次租船合同的履行過程中,可能會出現(xiàn)一方違約的情形。及時解除合同,對于守約方來說不失為避免損失的一種方法。因此,航次租船合同解除權(quán)的獲取對于需要解除合同的一方來說十分重要。為了研究航次租船合同的解除問題,筆者通過五個部分的內(nèi)容來進行闡述分析。 第一章分析航次租船合同解除的一些基本問題。航次租船合同作為當(dāng)事人協(xié)商一致的產(chǎn)物,在解約權(quán)問題上更加注重當(dāng)事人的意思自治。只有在合同未對解約權(quán)作出明確規(guī)定的情況下,其所選擇的準(zhǔn)據(jù)法中有關(guān)解除權(quán)的規(guī)定才會對當(dāng)事人產(chǎn)生效力。 第二章分析比較了英國和中國在合同解除原因方面的法律規(guī)定。除約定解除權(quán)解除合同外,中英兩國法在有關(guān)合同法定解除的問題上存在較大的差異。中國法在判定違約能否導(dǎo)致合同解除的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)方面比較模糊,不如英國法那樣具有可操作性。通過比較得出的結(jié)論,對十當(dāng)事人在選擇合同準(zhǔn)據(jù)法上能夠起到一定的指導(dǎo)作用。 第三章分析我國法下航次租船合同解除的情形。相比之下,承租人享有的合同解除情形要多于出租人。由于出租人在解除權(quán)方面處于劣勢地位,因此需要對出租人的合法利益進行保護,以平衡雙方的利益。 第四章分析航次租船合同解除后賠償責(zé)任范圍問題。解約條款情況下,承租人只有在證明出租人有違約的情況才可以向出租人索賠。法定解除情況下,根據(jù)法律的直接規(guī)定,違約方需要賠償守約方一定的經(jīng)濟損失,使得當(dāng)事人在合同解除后恢復(fù)到訂約前的經(jīng)濟狀態(tài)上 第五章提出了有關(guān)如何保護出租人合法權(quán)益的措施。為了避免承租人輕易解約而給出租人帶來損失,出租人可以訂立相關(guān)條款對其解約權(quán)予以限制。另外,由于我國《海商法》對于出租人解約權(quán)的規(guī)定存在不足之處,因此筆者提出了相關(guān)立法建議。
[Abstract]:A breach of contract may occur during the performance of the voyage charter party. The timely termination of the contract is a method of avoiding loss for the conformist. Therefore, it is very important to obtain the cancellation right of voyage charter party. In order to study the cancellation of voyage charter contract, the author expatiates and analyzes it through five parts. The first chapter analyzes some basic problems in the termination of voyage charter party. Voyage charter contract, as the result of the parties' consensus, pays more attention to the autonomy of the parties. Only if the contract does not make a clear provision on the right of rescission, the right of dissolution in the applicable law chosen by the contract will have effect on the parties. The second chapter analyzes and compares the legal provisions on the reason of termination of contract between Britain and China. In addition to the contractual right of rescission, there are great differences between China and the United Kingdom on the issue of legal rescission of the contract. Chinese law is vague in judging whether breach of contract can lead to termination of contract and is not as operable as English law. The conclusion can be used to guide the ten parties in choosing the applicable law of contract. The third chapter analyzes the termination of voyage charter party under the law of our country. By contrast, the lessee enjoys more rescission than the lessor. Because the lessor is in the inferior position in the aspect of rescission, it is necessary to protect the legal interests of the lessor in order to balance the interests of both sides. The fourth chapter analyzes the scope of liability after the termination of voyage charter party. The lessee may claim against the lessor only in case of breach of contract. In the case of legal dissolution, according to the direct provisions of the law, the breaching party needs to compensate the conformist for certain economic losses, so that the parties can restore to the economic state before the contract after the termination of the contract. The fifth chapter puts forward the measures about how to protect the legal rights and interests of the lessor. In order to avoid the lessee to terminate the contract easily and bring losses to the lessor, the lessor can make relevant clauses to restrict his right of dissolution. In addition, due to the deficiency of our country's Maritime Law about the lessor's right to rescind the contract, the author puts forward some relevant legislative suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D922.294

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 伍載陽;論合同的解除[J];重慶師院學(xué)報;1996年02期

2 楊秋林;論合同解除的法律后果[J];江西省團校學(xué)報;2000年04期

3 白慧林;論合同解除的條件[J];中國律師;2001年06期

4 王鐵軍;論建立我國的合同解除制度[J];法學(xué)研究;1994年04期

5 李家有;論合同解除的法律限制與法律責(zé)任[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1998年04期

6 黃超;試論合同解除權(quán)的行使[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(法學(xué)版);2004年06期

7 董微;合同解除和終止辨析[J];廣東社會科學(xué);2000年06期

8 李靜;論合同的解除與保證人責(zé)任[J];蘭州交通大學(xué)學(xué)報;2003年02期

9 王U，

本文編號：1815474