本文選題：注意義務(wù) + 醫(yī)療過失�。� 參考：《西南財經(jīng)大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著社會的進步和人民大眾越來越強烈的法律自我保護意識,以及層出不窮的醫(yī)療事故,關(guān)于醫(yī)療的案件將會越來越多,司法部門面對的壓力也將會越來越大,倘若放任現(xiàn)下的漏洞繼續(xù)下去,將會造成醫(yī)患矛盾的不斷升級并且也會帶來巨大的資源浪費。本文將會借助案例分析的方法對醫(yī)療過失的有關(guān)標準進行分析,以期提出對我國的司法實踐有益的建議。 本文對“李某”案進行了分析,找出現(xiàn)在司法實踐中所存在的主要問題,即醫(yī)療鑒定和司法鑒定的雙軌制,在醫(yī)療糾紛中因為牽扯到醫(yī)學(xué),其專業(yè)性非常強,所以法官在審案過程中對醫(yī)療鑒定的依賴性非常強,從另一個方面來講就是醫(yī)療事故鑒定對醫(yī)療過失的判定起著舉足輕重的作用。其次的問題是注意義務(wù)程度大小對案件審判的重要作用。目前我國的法律關(guān)于注意義務(wù)的規(guī)定分布在多種法律法規(guī)中,并不全面系統(tǒng),所以我們需要對注意義務(wù)進行統(tǒng)一全面的規(guī)定,從而有利于醫(yī)患雙發(fā)都可以明確醫(yī)方的注意義務(wù),也有利于法官可以明確的斷案,從而有利于案件的順利進行。 為解決上述問題,本文提出了一下的解決辦法：首先,規(guī)定好醫(yī)療鑒定和司法鑒定的鑒定內(nèi)容和鑒定范圍以及鑒定部門的職責(zé)范圍,規(guī)范好法官的職責(zé)范圍,使法官在醫(yī)療過失的案件中真正充分行使自己的職權(quán)而不是過分依賴醫(yī)療鑒定結(jié)果,放權(quán)給鑒定部門。并且明確好鑒定部門的鑒定內(nèi)容范圍和法官需要行使的職責(zé)之間的關(guān)系,將兩者協(xié)調(diào)好,規(guī)范好,才能使我們的醫(yī)患矛盾得到真正的解決。其次,對注意的內(nèi)容進行簡單的類型化劃分,即是可以將其分為診療義務(wù)、倫理性的義務(wù)和組織性的義務(wù)。我們提出兩種途徑來規(guī)定醫(yī)療注意義務(wù)的系統(tǒng),一是在我國目前實行的《合同法》中專門設(shè)立一章來規(guī)定醫(yī)療機構(gòu)及其醫(yī)療人員的注意義務(wù)。將該合同作為一項特殊的合同添加到未來的民法中去。二是可以專門擬定一部法律法規(guī)來專門調(diào)節(jié)醫(yī)患之間的民事法律關(guān)系,在這部法律中應(yīng)該詳細制定醫(yī)療鑒定的內(nèi)容及注意義務(wù)的內(nèi)容。
[Abstract]:With the progress of society, the growing awareness of legal self-protection among the public, and the endless occurrence of medical accidents, there will be more and more cases of medical treatment, and the pressure on the judiciary will be increasing. Allowing the current loopholes to continue will lead to escalating doctor-patient conflicts and a huge waste of resources. This article will use the method of case analysis to analyze the relevant standards of medical negligence in order to put forward beneficial suggestions to the judicial practice of our country. This paper analyzes the case of "Li Mou" and finds out the main problems that exist in the judicial practice, that is, the two-track system of medical appraisal and judicial expertise, which is very professional in medical disputes because of its involvement in medicine. Therefore, the judge is very dependent on medical expertise in the course of the trial. From another aspect, medical malpractice identification plays an important role in the determination of medical negligence. The second problem is the importance of the duty of attention to the trial of cases. At present, the provisions on the duty of care in our country's laws and regulations are distributed in a variety of laws and regulations and are not comprehensive and systematic. Therefore, we need to make a unified and comprehensive regulation of the duty of care, so that both doctors and patients can clearly define the duty of care of doctors and patients. It is also conducive to the judge to clear the case, thus conducive to the smooth progress of the case. In order to solve the above problems, this paper puts forward some solutions: first of all, define the content and scope of identification of medical and judicial expertise, as well as the scope of responsibilities of the identification department, standardize the scope of duties of judges. So that the judge in the case of medical negligence really fully exercise their own powers rather than relying too much on the results of medical appraisal and delegate the authority to the appraisal department. And make clear the relationship between the scope of appraisal content and the duty that the judge needs to exercise, coordinate the two, standardize well, can make our doctor and patient contradiction get the real solution. Secondly, the contents of attention can be divided into diagnosis and treatment obligations, ethical obligations and organizational obligations. We put forward two ways to define the duty of care system. One is to set up a special chapter in the contract Law of our country to stipulate the duty of care of medical institutions and their medical personnel. The contract is added to the future civil law as a special contract. Second, we can make a special law and regulations to regulate the civil legal relationship between doctors and patients. In this law, we should elaborate the content of medical appraisal and the content of duty of care.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.6;D922.16

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 楊立新;;論醫(yī)療過失的證明及舉證責(zé)任[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年06期

2 關(guān)淑芳;論醫(yī)療過錯的認定[J];清華大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2002年05期

，

本文編號：1793527