本文選題：人格權法　切入點：合同法　出處：《東方法學》2017年06期

【摘要】：人格權法除需與民法總則、侵權責任法相銜接外,還需與合同法銜接。人格尊嚴保護與消極締約自由存在沖突,兩者的平衡應以我國現有相關法律規(guī)定和實踐為基礎,借鑒域外立法經驗來實現。人格權的限制、轉讓以及行使方式的規(guī)定對合同的效力認定在路徑與結果兩方面存在影響。完善債務不履行侵害人格權的損害賠償制度需明確規(guī)定賠償項目、合理界定可預見性規(guī)則的適用范圍。人格權商業(yè)化利用的合同法規(guī)制路徑將妨礙其制度內容表達,人格權法的規(guī)制路徑則更為可行。人格權法屬于民法典的重大創(chuàng)新且缺乏足夠先例可循,立法應關注并慎重處理人格權法與其他法律制度的互動關系。
[Abstract]:In addition to the general principles of civil law and the law of tort liability, the law of personality rights should be connected with the law of contract. There is a conflict between the protection of human dignity and the freedom of negative contracting. The balance between the two should be based on the existing relevant legal provisions and practices in China. Draw lessons from the experience of foreign legislation to realize the restriction of personality right, The provisions of transfer and exercise mode have an impact on the validity of the contract in both path and result. To perfect the system of damages for non-performance of debts infringing on personal rights, it is necessary to clearly stipulate the compensation items. Reasonable definition of the scope of application of the rules of predictability. The path of the regulation of the commercial use of personality rights will hinder the expression of its system content. The regulation path of personality right law is more feasible. Personality right law belongs to the important innovation of civil code and lacks enough precedent to follow. The legislation should pay attention to and carefully deal with the interactive relationship between personality right law and other legal systems.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學法學院;
【分類號】：D923

【相似文獻】

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 魏曉陽;標表型人格權的法律保護研究[D];首都經濟貿易大學;2017年

2 陳如炮;大數據時代個人信息之私權保護路徑研究[D];中國政法大學;2016年

，

本文編號：1660844