本文選題：政府采購　切入點(diǎn)：招標(biāo)投標(biāo)　出處：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：政府采購招投標(biāo)合同是作為采購人的政府機(jī)關(guān)與供應(yīng)商通過招標(biāo)投標(biāo)的方式訂立關(guān)于貨物、工程或服務(wù)的合同,同時受到《合同法》、《政府采購法》、《招標(biāo)投標(biāo)法》三部法律的約束,然而由于立法上的不完善與沖突導(dǎo)致學(xué)界和實(shí)踐中對政府采購合同的一些關(guān)鍵問題存有爭議；而實(shí)踐中,由于行政力量歷史性習(xí)慣性地過于強(qiáng)大,以至于行政主體過多地將其管理者的權(quán)力運(yùn)用在在平等的民事法律關(guān)系中,而對于處于弱勢地位的供應(yīng)商來講,由于政府采購的項(xiàng)目標(biāo)的額通常較大,拿下一個政府的“大單子”對供應(yīng)商、特別是中小型企業(yè)影響很大,供應(yīng)商也會盡力保全與政府的交易,但是長此以往,不僅不利于供應(yīng)商合法利益的保護(hù),也會影響到整個政府采購活動的良性發(fā)展。 本文主要包括五個部分,第一部分是引言,介紹了本文的選題動機(jī)、寫作目的和文章結(jié)構(gòu)安排,其余四個部分主要是按照合同締約的準(zhǔn)備、成立、履行這一時間順序,分析了各個階段存在的與合同法相關(guān)的問題。 第一章政府采購招標(biāo)投標(biāo)合同的現(xiàn)狀及問題,簡要介紹了政府采購制度和招標(biāo)投標(biāo)制度,提出了政府采購招標(biāo)投標(biāo)合同在理論上存在的對招標(biāo)、投標(biāo)、發(fā)出中標(biāo)通知書行為性質(zhì)界定的爭議以及實(shí)踐中對合同成立時間確定及履行合同過程中責(zé)任承擔(dān)不合法不合理的問題。 第二章政府采購招標(biāo)與投標(biāo)的法律性質(zhì)研究,從對合同法上的要約邀請和要約的法律性質(zhì)的分析和比較,進(jìn)而對招標(biāo)行為和投標(biāo)行為的法律性質(zhì)進(jìn)行相應(yīng)的分析,并得出了招標(biāo)行為出個別情況下應(yīng)當(dāng)被界定為要約邀請,也自然得出投標(biāo)行為的性質(zhì)為要約的結(jié)論。另外還對投標(biāo)人提交的投標(biāo)保證金的性質(zhì)進(jìn)行了分析,并將其定性為一種非典型擔(dān)保。 第三章政府采購招投標(biāo)合同成立時間研究,通過引用案例提出問題,從對合同成立要件的分析,否定了法定形式對合同成立的影響,分析了中標(biāo)通知書的法律效力,得出中標(biāo)通知書發(fā)出則合同成立的結(jié)論。 第四章政府采購招投標(biāo)合同的履行問題研究,通過引用案例提出問題,分析了政府采購合同履行過程中涉及到的法律責(zé)任,包括公法責(zé)任和私法責(zé)任,立法應(yīng)當(dāng)明確列舉公法責(zé)任,除此之外,一律承擔(dān)違約責(zé)任。 本文通過提出問題、厘清爭議、提出立法建議,以期對政府采購招標(biāo)投標(biāo)合同在實(shí)踐中和立法上的改進(jìn)有所裨益。
[Abstract]:Government procurement bidding contract is for government agencies and suppliers who through bidding way to conclude about the goods, projects or services contract, at the same time by the "contract law", "Government Procurement Law >, < > three bidding law legal constraints, however, because the legislation is not perfect and conflict studies research and Practice on some key problems in the government procurement contract dispute; and in practice, because of administrative power historical habit is too strong, so that the administrative subject over the management of the use of power in the civil law of equality, and for disadvantaged suppliers, because the target the government procurement amount is big, with the government under a big list of suppliers, especially the influence of small and medium enterprises, suppliers will try to preserve the dealings with government, but this is long In the past, it is not only harmful to the protection of the legitimate interests of the suppliers, but also affects the benign development of the whole government procurement activities.
This paper mainly includes five parts, the first part is the introduction, introduces the research motivation, purpose and structure of this paper, the four part is established in accordance with the contract, to fulfill this time sequence, analysis of the various stages of the contract law and related issues.
The first chapter of the status quo and problems of government procurement bidding contract, introduces the system of government procurement and bidding system, proposed to the government procurement bidding, bidding bidding contract exists in theory, to determine the contract time to issue a bid winning notice defining the nature of the dispute and behavior in practice and fulfill the responsibility is not legal the reasonable contract process.
The second chapter research on the legal nature of government procurement bidding, from the comparison and analysis of the legal nature of contract law on the offer invitation and offer the corresponding analysis and the legal nature of the bidding and bidding, and the bidding behavior of individual case should be defined as an invitation, nature and nature the bidding offer the conclusion. In addition of the tender deposit properties submitted by the bidder is analyzed, and its characterization as a untypical guarantee.
The third chapter is the government procurement bidding contract research, proposed the question by citing the case, from the analysis of the elements of the contract, the legal form of negative influence to the contract establishment, analyzes the legal effect of notification of award, the winning notice is issued the contract made the conclusion.
The research on performance of the fourth chapter of government procurement bidding contract, put forward the question by citing the case, analyzes the performance of government procurement contracts involved in the process of legal liability, including public law liability and liability in private law, legislation should expressly listed public responsibility, in addition, a law is liable for breach of contract.
By putting forward questions, this article clarifies the dispute and puts forward legislative proposals in order to benefit the improvement of government procurement bidding contract in practice and legislation.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D922.2;D922.297

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 王延波;;完善政府采購?fù)稑?biāo)保證金制度的思考[J];邊疆經(jīng)濟(jì)與文化;2009年06期

2 余承淵;;淺析招標(biāo)行為的法律屬性[J];法制與社會;2012年08期

3 崔建遠(yuǎn);行政合同之我見[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

，

本文編號：1638348