中非BITs中的投資爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制
[Abstract]:Africa's unique geographical location and rich natural resources make it an important investment market in China. However, African countries have been volatile and belligerent in recent years, posing great political risks to Chinese investors. The bilateral investment treaty between China and Africa is the agreement between China and African countries on encouraging and promoting investment, and it is the legal basis for the two sides to carry out investment activities and settle investment disputes. With the increase of Chinese investors' direct investment activities in Africa and the expansion of their scale, in order to better protect the investment interests of Chinese investors, improve the legal environment for investment in Africa, promote the development of African economies, and achieve a win-win situation between China and Africa, it is urgent to analyze and study the existing investment dispute settlement mechanism in bilateral investment treaties and put forward some suggestions on the problems existing in the clauses. This paper first introduces the general situation and basic framework of bilateral investment treaties between China and Africa, analyzes the main contents and characteristics of BITs in China and Africa from the basic provisions of investment treatment, expropriation and war compensation, and points out the problems that may lead to investment disputes. Secondly, it focuses on the dispute settlement clauses in China and Africa BITs, summarizes several ways of settlement of investment disputes between contracting parties and investors and host countries, and finds out the defects in the investment dispute settlement mechanism through evaluation and analysis, and puts forward some suggestions for improvement in view of these defects. Finally, this paper introduces the arbitration mechanism of special arbitral tribunal and (ICSID), including arbitration rules, composition of arbitral tribunal, scope of arbitration and applicable law, compares and analyzes the similarities and differences between them, and concludes that arbitration, as the best choice for settlement of investment disputes between China and Africa, still needs to be further developed and improved.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號(hào)】:D996.4;D997.4
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 余瑩;;國際投資條約自由化背景下防御性條款的設(shè)置——對(duì)我國BITs實(shí)踐的思考[J];北方法學(xué);2008年03期
2 張利賓;;對(duì)中國企業(yè)海外投資法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的研究[J];北京仲裁;2011年04期
3 劉青海;;新時(shí)期中非投資合作:現(xiàn)狀、問題與對(duì)策——以喀麥隆為例[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2011年06期
4 張光;;論國際投資仲裁中投資者利益與公共利益的平衡[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2011年01期
5 劉筍;;國際投資仲裁裁決的不一致性問題及其解決[J];法商研究;2009年06期
6 余勁松;詹曉寧;;國際投資協(xié)定的近期發(fā)展及對(duì)中國的影響[J];法學(xué)家;2006年03期
7 蔡從燕;;外國投資者利用國際投資仲裁機(jī)制新發(fā)展反思——國際法實(shí)施機(jī)制與南北矛盾的雙重視角[J];法學(xué)家;2007年03期
8 余勁松;梁丹妮;;公平公正待遇的最新發(fā)展動(dòng)向及我國的對(duì)策[J];法學(xué)家;2007年06期
9 梁詠;;我國海外直接投資的現(xiàn)狀與雙邊投資協(xié)定的完善[J];法學(xué);2008年07期
10 申茜;;雙邊投資條約的自由化趨勢(shì)與中國的實(shí)踐[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年26期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 楊衛(wèi)東;雙邊投資條約:中國的視角[D];中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2002年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 陳榮;論國際投資爭(zhēng)端中的仲裁[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年
2 李蓓;論完善中外BIT解決“投資者—東道國”爭(zhēng)端的國際仲裁機(jī)制[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年
本文編號(hào):2500209
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2500209.html