【摘要】：東京審判的管轄權(quán)問(wèn)題多年來(lái)一直爭(zhēng)議不斷,關(guān)涉遠(yuǎn)東國(guó)際軍事法庭是否具有合法性以及有無(wú)管轄上的"越權(quán)"和"失職"等問(wèn)題。戰(zhàn)后審判的特殊性和國(guó)際刑法發(fā)展的階段性造成了東京審判管轄權(quán)確立的困難,東京審判管轄權(quán)并非沒(méi)有瑕疵,但其合法性和正義性不容置疑。東京審判管轄權(quán)的確立賦予國(guó)際刑法以剛性,促進(jìn)了國(guó)際刑事責(zé)任的個(gè)人化,闡明了"選擇性司法"的危害,為國(guó)際刑法的當(dāng)代發(fā)展留下了大量珍貴的法律遺產(chǎn)。
[Abstract]:The issue of jurisdiction over the Tokyo trial has been in dispute over the years, whether it has the legitimacy of the Far East International Military Court and the existence or absence of such issues as "ultra vires" and "breach of duty". The particularity of the post-war trial and the stage of the development of the international criminal law have caused the difficulties in the establishment of the jurisdiction of the Tokyo trial, and the jurisdiction of the Tokyo trial is not free of defects, but its legitimacy and justice are beyond question. The establishment of the jurisdiction in Tokyo gives the international criminal law the rigidity, promotes the individual of the international criminal responsibility, expounds the harm of the "selective justice", and has left a great deal of precious legal legacy for the contemporary development of the international criminal law.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;
【分類號(hào)】：D995

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 馮兆蕙,馮文生;“跨國(guó)”侵犯知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)案件的審判管轄與法律適用[J];河北法學(xué);1999年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2497493