【摘要】：無追索權(quán)是福費(fèi)廷業(yè)務(wù)的最大特點(diǎn)和優(yōu)點(diǎn)。這在一定程度上也成為吸引出口商的最大亮點(diǎn)。本文對與福費(fèi)廷無追索權(quán)有關(guān)的基本法律問題進(jìn)行了論述。除引言和結(jié)語部分之外,全文共包括五章。 第一章對福費(fèi)廷無追索權(quán)進(jìn)行了概述。首先界定了福費(fèi)廷無追索權(quán)的相關(guān)定義,包括追索權(quán)和福費(fèi)廷的概念。論述了無追索權(quán)和福費(fèi)廷當(dāng)事人權(quán)利義務(wù)的關(guān)系,當(dāng)事人之間的權(quán)利義務(wù)內(nèi)容是無追索權(quán)的基礎(chǔ)。無追索權(quán)是當(dāng)事人權(quán)利義務(wù)關(guān)系妥協(xié)的結(jié)果。 第二章分析了福費(fèi)廷無追索權(quán)的法律基礎(chǔ)。法律基礎(chǔ)的探討是進(jìn)行法律研究的出發(fā)點(diǎn)和歸宿點(diǎn)。福費(fèi)廷無追索權(quán)的法律基礎(chǔ)是債權(quán)讓與。福費(fèi)廷無追索權(quán)中的債權(quán)讓與傳統(tǒng)民法中的債權(quán)讓與不同,它以票據(jù)為債權(quán)表現(xiàn)形式,這使得福費(fèi)廷業(yè)務(wù)導(dǎo)入了票據(jù)法的調(diào)整范圍,也為福費(fèi)廷業(yè)務(wù)的實(shí)質(zhì)開展提供了便利與條件。 第三章對福費(fèi)廷無追索權(quán)的實(shí)現(xiàn)方式及相對性進(jìn)行了論述。福費(fèi)廷無追索權(quán)的實(shí)現(xiàn)方式包括票據(jù)背書轉(zhuǎn)讓和放棄追索的書面承諾兩種方式。無追索權(quán)不是絕對的,出口商必須符合一定的先決條件。擔(dān)保是福費(fèi)廷無追索權(quán)實(shí)現(xiàn)的間接保證,保付簽字、獨(dú)立保函及備用信用證是福費(fèi)廷中擔(dān)保的主要方式。對于保付簽字及獨(dú)立擔(dān)保的效力各國法律、國際公約及國際慣例有不同的規(guī)定。 第四章對福費(fèi)廷無追索權(quán)的法律適用問題進(jìn)行了論述。福費(fèi)廷涉及多方當(dāng)事人和多種法律關(guān)系,其法律適用相對比較復(fù)雜。本文根據(jù)國際私法中當(dāng)事人意思自治原則和最密切聯(lián)系地原則對福費(fèi)廷的法律適用進(jìn)行了梳理。針對我國《票據(jù)法》中對于涉外票據(jù)法律適用的有關(guān)規(guī)定,宜采用“發(fā)行說”認(rèn)定出票地。我國銀行在實(shí)踐中應(yīng)根據(jù)具體情況選擇對己方有益的法律適用條款。 第五章論述了福費(fèi)廷無追索權(quán)相關(guān)的法律問題,并提出了完善意見。對《合同法》、《票據(jù)法》相關(guān)條文提出了完善修改意見。我國沒有獨(dú)立擔(dān)保的明確規(guī)定,根據(jù)各國的法律實(shí)際,我國應(yīng)在司法實(shí)踐中確立獨(dú)立擔(dān)保制度。分析了福費(fèi)廷無追索權(quán)的相對性對我國銀行福費(fèi)廷業(yè)務(wù)規(guī)范的啟示并提出了完善意見。
[Abstract]:No recourse is the greatest feature and advantage of Forfaiting business. To some extent, this has become the biggest attraction to exporters. This paper discusses the basic legal issues related to Forfaiting's non-recourse right. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the full text consists of five chapters. The first chapter summarizes Forfaiting's right of no recourse. Firstly, the author defines the relevant definition of Forfaiting's right of no recourse, including the concept of right of recourse and Forfaiting. The relationship between the right of no recourse and the rights and obligations of Forfaiting parties is discussed. The content of rights and obligations between the parties is the basis of the right of no recourse. The non-recourse right is the result of the compromise between the parties' rights and obligations. The second chapter analyzes the legal basis of Forfaiting's right of no recourse. The discussion of legal basis is the starting point and destination of legal research. The legal basis of Forfaiting's right of no recourse is the assignment of creditor's rights. The assignment of creditor's rights in Forfaiting's right of no recourse is different from that in traditional civil law. It takes bill as the form of expression of creditor's rights, which makes Forfaiting's business lead into the adjustment scope of instrument law. It also provides convenience and conditions for the substantive development of Forfaiting business. The third chapter discusses the realization and relativity of Forfaiting's non-recourse right. Forfaiting's realization of non-recourse includes two ways: transfer of bill endorsement and written commitment of waiver of recourse. Non-recourse is not absolute, exporters must meet certain prerequisites. The guarantee is the indirect guarantee of Forfaiting's realization without recourse. The main way of the guarantee in Forfaiting is the signature of guarantee, the independent guarantee and the standby letter of credit. National laws, international conventions and international practices have different provisions on the validity of warranty signatures and independent guarantees. Chapter four discusses the application of Forfaiting's non-recourse law. Forfaiting involves multiple parties and legal relationships, and its legal application is relatively complex. According to the principle of party autonomy in private international law and the principle of closest connection, this paper combs Forfaiting's application of law. In view of the relevant provisions of the law applicable to foreign bills in the Bill Law of our country, it is advisable to use the "issue theory" to identify the place where the ticket is issued. In practice, Chinese banks should choose the applicable terms that are beneficial to their own parties according to the specific conditions. Chapter five discusses the legal problems related to Forfaiting's right of no recourse, and puts forward some suggestions. On the contract Law, the relevant provisions of the Bill Law proposed to improve the amendment. There is no clear stipulation of independent guarantee in our country. According to the law practice of each country, we should establish the independent guarantee system in judicial practice. This paper analyzes the enlightenment of the relativity of Forfaiting's right of no recourse to the norms of Forfaiting's business in our country and puts forward some suggestions for perfection.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996;D922.287;D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 白彥;獨(dú)立擔(dān)保制度探析[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2003年02期

2 李金澤;關(guān)于商業(yè)銀行開展福費(fèi)庭業(yè)務(wù)的法律思考[J];金融論壇;2003年01期

3 李雙元,周輝斌;備用信用證法律特征之考察[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2001年03期

4 王志華;對獨(dú)立擔(dān)保國內(nèi)效力的承認(rèn)及其法律完善[J];法律適用;2003年11期

5 黃晉;有關(guān)票據(jù)保證制度的幾個問題[J];法學(xué)雜志;2000年06期

6 賀連博;論福費(fèi)廷的性質(zhì)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2005年03期

7 闕莉娜;關(guān)于“福費(fèi)庭”融資的若干法律問題分析[J];法學(xué);2003年11期

8 李國安;效率優(yōu)先下的必然選擇——獨(dú)立擔(dān)保的國際實(shí)踐及其法律內(nèi)涵[J];國際貿(mào)易;2004年10期

9 姚毅;評《國際商會備用信用證慣例(ISP98)》[J];國際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2000年01期

10 崔婷;關(guān)于福費(fèi)庭融資的若干法律問題分析[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 陳文昊;福費(fèi)廷業(yè)務(wù)及在中國法下的解讀[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年

2 劉宇;國際貿(mào)易中獨(dú)立擔(dān)保制度若干法律問題研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號：2362709