論WTO與RTAS爭端解決的管轄權(quán)沖突與協(xié)調(diào)
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the rapid development of regional trade arrangements (RTAs), it has become an indisputable fact that WTO and the dispute settlement mechanism of RTAs coexist. At the same time, the DSU (understanding on the rules and procedures of dispute settlement) does not deal with the dispute jurisdiction of regional trade arrangements, but only its own jurisdiction. The existing provisions of WTO and RTA on jurisdiction inevitably lead to the conflict of jurisdiction between the two parties, so when the dispute occurs, how does the member choose the dispute settlement body? Or if a dispute settlement application has been submitted to a different dispute settlement body successively or simultaneously, what should be done by the dispute settlement body? This paper uses the method of combining empirical analysis and comparative analysis to discuss the conflict of jurisdiction in the dispute settlement mechanism between WTO and RTAs, and analyzes the practice of North American Free Trade area (NAFTA) and European Union (EU). This paper discusses the causes of jurisdiction conflict between WTO and RTAs dispute settlement mechanism and some basic problems, such as the ways of coordination and so on, and makes a detailed analysis in combination with specific cases, and puts forward the corresponding viewpoints or solutions. In order to coordinate the operational relationship between WTO and RTAs and distribute jurisdiction between WTO and other regional trade arrangements reasonably, this paper makes an appropriate analysis of the dispute settlement mechanism of China-ASEAN Free Trade area. This paper discusses how to make effective use of this mechanism in order to protect our legal rights and interests. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter analyzes the influence of the development of regional trade arrangement on WTO from the angle of the relationship between WTO and RTA, and compares the characteristics of dispute settlement between RTA and RTA. The second chapter studies the conflict of jurisdiction between WTO and RTA and the causes of the conflict, and explains the validity of jurisdiction exclusion clause in detail by the issue of jurisdiction concurrence in the Mexican beverage case. Chapter three deals with the conflict of jurisdiction, discusses the coordination of the conflict, including the methods and principles of conflict, and analyzes the dispute settlement mechanism of the North American Free Trade area and the European Union in order to provide reference and enlightenment. Chapter four studies the conflict and coordination of dispute settlement jurisdiction between China-ASEAN Free Trade area (CAFTA) and WTO. This paper analyzes the present situation of CAFTA, the characteristics of the Agreement on dispute settlement Mechanism between China and ASEAN, and the conflict coordination between the two, and finally puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions to be taken by our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號】:D996.1
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 雷蕾;;淺談歐盟解決民商事管轄權(quán)沖突對我國的啟示[J];佳木斯教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年12期
2 王郁;;中國-東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)內(nèi)我國與東盟國家之間民商事管轄權(quán)沖突及其協(xié)調(diào)[J];企業(yè)技術(shù)開發(fā);2013年Z1期
3 張淑鈿;;論先受理法院機制在涉港案件管轄權(quán)沖突中的適用[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年05期
4 陳瑾;;淺談管轄權(quán)沖突及其解決[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)理人;2005年05期
5 顏林;;論多邊公約體系下的國際民商事案件管轄權(quán)沖突及其解決[J];社會科學(xué)輯刊;2008年05期
6 王淑敏;;碳捕捉與海底封存的訴訟管轄權(quán)沖突研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2013年08期
7 周曉林;;美國法律的域外管轄與國際管轄權(quán)沖突[J];國際問題研究;1984年03期
8 茆榮華;論涉外民事管轄權(quán)沖突[J];政法學(xué)習(xí).新疆公安司法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;1994年01期
9 劉彬;;論國際貿(mào)易協(xié)定司法管轄權(quán)沖突——邁向功能競賽[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(法學(xué)版);2011年02期
10 張淑鈿;;涉港民事管轄權(quán)沖突解決機制的重構(gòu)[J];法學(xué)論壇;2011年06期
相關(guān)會議論文 前1條
1 陳姝,
本文編號:2240588
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2240588.html