【摘要】：隨著全球經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化時(shí)代的到來(lái),知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的力度在國(guó)際貿(mào)易中得到了加強(qiáng)。美國(guó)的337調(diào)查便是保護(hù)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的有力武器,其調(diào)查的范圍是向美國(guó)的進(jìn)口貿(mào)易中侵害知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的產(chǎn)品和其他的不公平競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為。我國(guó)自從加入WTO以后,國(guó)際貿(mào)易得到了迅速的發(fā)展。但是由于我國(guó)企業(yè)缺乏有競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)核心產(chǎn)品,因此頻頻遭遇美國(guó)的337調(diào)查,而今我國(guó)已成為337調(diào)查的主要對(duì)象國(guó)。中國(guó)企業(yè)遭遇美國(guó)337調(diào)查的案件,如果勝訴,那么便是起訴方的專(zhuān)利有問(wèn)題或者是訴訟工作不嚴(yán)謹(jǐn),或者中國(guó)企業(yè)的專(zhuān)利是自主研發(fā)的;如果和解,那么便是雙方不同程度的讓步;至于敗訴,那是由于侵犯了起訴方的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)。就我國(guó)企業(yè)頻繁遭遇337調(diào)查的原因來(lái)說(shuō),其根本原因是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)欠發(fā)達(dá),衍生原因是不尊重他人知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)和消極應(yīng)訴。而要突破美國(guó)的337調(diào)查,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)創(chuàng)新是根本途徑,其連帶對(duì)策是合法經(jīng)營(yíng)、規(guī)劃和實(shí)施知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略以及積極應(yīng)訴。我國(guó)企業(yè)只有知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)達(dá),才能有效地化解337調(diào)查的困境。我國(guó)只有成為知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家,才能對(duì)國(guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù),對(duì)國(guó)際貿(mào)易,作出一個(gè)大國(guó)應(yīng)有的貢獻(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:With the advent of the era of global economic integration, the protection of intellectual property rights has been strengthened in international trade. The 337 survey in the United States is a powerful weapon for the protection of intellectual property rights. Its scope of investigation is products infringing intellectual property rights and other unfair competition in import trade from the United States. International trade has developed rapidly. However, due to the lack of competitive intellectual property core products, Chinese enterprises frequently encounter 337 investigations in the United States, and now China has become the main target country of 337 investigations. Lawsuit work is not rigorous, or the patents of Chinese enterprises are independently developed; if reconciliation is made, there will be different degrees of concession between the two sides; as for the defeat, it is because of infringement of the intellectual property rights of the prosecution. In order to break through the 337 investigation in the United States, intellectual property innovation is the fundamental way. Its joint and several countermeasures are lawful operation, planning and implementing intellectual property strategy, and actively responding to the lawsuit. Only in this way can we make contributions to international intellectual property protection and international trade.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D997.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 胡承偉;;關(guān)鍵設(shè)施理論與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)拒絕許可的反壟斷規(guī)制[J];濱州學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年02期

2 ;時(shí)訊點(diǎn)擊[J];法律與生活;2014年11期

3 ;江西省人民政府關(guān)于裴忠彪等同志正式任職的通知[J];江西省人民政府公報(bào);2014年07期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 于光榮;中國(guó)企業(yè)應(yīng)對(duì)美國(guó)337調(diào)查的案例和對(duì)策研究[D];湖南工業(yè)大學(xué);2017年

，

本文編號(hào)：2191929