發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-31 07:59

  本文選題：WTO + 裁決執(zhí)行��； 參考：《環(huán)球法律評(píng)論》2017年05期

【摘要】：美國(guó)主導(dǎo)創(chuàng)設(shè)了WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制。通過(guò)這一機(jī)制,美國(guó)提起WTO申訴的頻率以及申訴的勝訴率都極高,其自助執(zhí)行能力在世界范圍內(nèi)也最強(qiáng),但是近年來(lái)美國(guó)卻頻頻與各國(guó)進(jìn)行談判并試圖通過(guò)簽訂大區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定來(lái)架空WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制,甚至直接退出這個(gè)機(jī)制。從WTO裁決的角度來(lái)看,這似乎意味著WTO原告勝訴裁決的執(zhí)行效果和國(guó)家利益的完全實(shí)現(xiàn)之間并不完全重合。一方面,部分原告勝訴裁決執(zhí)行不完全仍然可以間接的實(shí)現(xiàn)國(guó)家利益;另一方面,部分原告勝訴裁決完全執(zhí)行卻不能完全的實(shí)現(xiàn)國(guó)家利益。這種背離現(xiàn)象雖然客觀上起到了調(diào)節(jié)WTO申訴率的作用,然而伴隨著社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)和政治大環(huán)境的演變,這一現(xiàn)象卻成為如美國(guó)這樣具有強(qiáng)大自助執(zhí)行能力的大國(guó)意欲改造甚至拋棄WTO體系的重要原因。鑒于此,中國(guó)需要在進(jìn)一步提高WTO申訴率的基礎(chǔ)上,分類(lèi)評(píng)估勝訴裁決執(zhí)行的效果,同時(shí)在厘清美國(guó)政治結(jié)構(gòu)失衡對(duì)執(zhí)行難度的影響后,跟進(jìn)甚至超越美國(guó)對(duì)國(guó)際經(jīng)貿(mào)糾紛解決程序的設(shè)計(jì)與引導(dǎo)。
[Abstract]:The United States has led to the creation of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. Through this mechanism, the United States has a high frequency of appealing to WTO and the high rate of appeal, and its self-service ability is the strongest in the world. However, in recent years, the United States has frequently negotiated with countries and tried to build a WTO dispute settlement mechanism by signing a large regional trade agreement. From the point of view of the WTO verdict, it seems to mean that the implementation effect of the WTO plaintiff's winning decision and the complete realization of the national interests are not completely coincided. On the one hand, the implementation of the decision of a partial plaintiff's winning decision is not entirely possible to achieve the national interests; on the other hand, some of the plaintiffs won the decision to finish the decision. The whole implementation can not fully realize the national interests. This deviant phenomenon has played an objective role in regulating the WTO appeal rate. However, with the evolution of the social economy and the political environment, this phenomenon has become an important reason for the great power of the great power, such as the United States, which has strong self-service ability to transform and even abandon the WTO system. On the basis of this, China needs to further improve the WTO appeal rate and classify the effect of the success of the award, while clarifying the impact of the unbalance of American political structure on the difficulty of execution, and following up and even surpassing the design and guidance of the United States on the international economic and trade dispute settlement procedure.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)政法大學(xué)國(guó)際法學(xué)院;
【基金】：2012年度國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金青年項(xiàng)目“WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的原告利益取向與對(duì)策研究”(12CFX110) 教育部2014年度高等學(xué)校全國(guó)優(yōu)秀博士學(xué)位論文作者專(zhuān)項(xiàng)資金資助項(xiàng)目“國(guó)際經(jīng)貿(mào)法律規(guī)則博弈與中國(guó)角色研究”(201407)的研究成果
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D996.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李英芬;;對(duì)國(guó)家利益的國(guó)際法思考[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會(huì)科學(xué)(漢文版);2006年06期

2 何志鵬;;國(guó)家觀念的重塑與國(guó)際法治的可能[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

3 高婧;;國(guó)家利益與國(guó)際法的互動(dòng)[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年17期

4 左海聰;宋陽(yáng);;超越“國(guó)家利益”:對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)概念的反思與重塑[J];學(xué)術(shù)界;2013年04期

5 袁雪;孫金鳳;王鼎;;法律選擇理論中國(guó)家利益的國(guó)際協(xié)調(diào)[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年05期

6 武振;;國(guó)際法上國(guó)家及政府承認(rèn)的依據(jù)——國(guó)家利益[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年07期

7 熊s，

本文編號(hào)：1958889