本文選題：ICSID　切入點(diǎn)：公司國籍　出處：《國際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作》2017年04期

【摘要】：隨著中國企業(yè)海外投資規(guī)模的不斷擴(kuò)大,海外投資的最終實(shí)質(zhì)性的法律保護(hù)將成為企業(yè)關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)之一。在實(shí)踐中,ICSID對跨境輸出的資本保護(hù)力度最高,但在投資爭議中涉及的"公司國籍"認(rèn)定問題由于不同法學(xué)理論,導(dǎo)致了大量相互不一致、甚至沖突的判決案例。本文從外國投資者的范圍與定義、公司投資者國籍認(rèn)定的復(fù)雜性、雙邊條約簽約雙方的約定內(nèi)容、刺破公司面紗原則的應(yīng)用、條約利益的否定,以及誠信原則為出發(fā)點(diǎn),整理歸納出一些原則,為實(shí)踐者提供國際投資架構(gòu)的設(shè)計基礎(chǔ),以便于投資者最終獲得ICSID的司法管轄權(quán),并獲得ICSID的法律保護(hù)。
[Abstract]:With the continuous expansion of the scale of overseas investment of Chinese enterprises, the ultimate substantive legal protection of overseas investment will become one of the focuses of attention of enterprises. In practice, ICSID has the highest degree of capital protection for cross-border exports. However, due to different legal theories, the determination of "corporate nationality" involved in investment disputes has led to a large number of inconsistent or even conflicting cases. This paper focuses on the scope and definition of foreign investors. The complexity of the identification of the nationality of corporate investors, the contents of the agreements between the two parties to the bilateral treaties, the application of the principle of piercing the corporate veil, the negation of the interests of the treaties, and the principle of good faith are the starting points. It provides the design basis of the international investment framework for practitioners, so that investors can finally obtain the jurisdiction of ICSID and the legal protection of ICSID.
【作者單位】： 北京德恒律師事務(wù)所;
【分類號】：D996.4

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 張磊;;論英美法系與大陸法系在公司國籍認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)上的改良[J];科學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)社會;2012年04期

2 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號：1680045