本文選題：共同但有區(qū)別的責任　切入點：國際環(huán)境法　出處：《遼寧大學》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：地球是我們?nèi)祟愘囈陨娴牡胤?但由于近幾個世紀以來人類過度的利用,地球的環(huán)境受到史無前例的嚴峻挑戰(zhàn)。全世界各國都已經(jīng)認識到環(huán)境保護的重要性。但在具體履行全球環(huán)境保護義務(wù)以及承擔各自相應(yīng)的責任方面,發(fā)達國家與發(fā)展中國家存在著很大的分歧。正是基于上述矛盾,一項基于國際分配正義的理念發(fā)展出來了一項責任即“共同但有區(qū)別的責任”。該責任在國際環(huán)境保護領(lǐng)域具有里程碑的性質(zhì),其內(nèi)涵表現(xiàn)為：全世界各國無論發(fā)達國家還是發(fā)展中國家都負有環(huán)境保護義務(wù),但因歷史、經(jīng)濟狀況等因素,發(fā)達國家應(yīng)承擔更大、更多的責任。在該責任的指導(dǎo)下,使得更多的發(fā)展中國家參與到全球環(huán)境保護中來,因此研究“共同但有區(qū)別的責任”不僅具有理論意義更具有實踐意義。 本文共分五部分,近兩萬五千字左右,主要從以下五個方面來論述國際環(huán)境法中的共同但有區(qū)別的責任。第一部分論述了共同但有區(qū)別的責任的基本內(nèi)涵,包括概念、內(nèi)容以及其產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展過程；第二部分主要采用了比較的方法分析了共同但有區(qū)別的責任同傳統(tǒng)國際公法領(lǐng)域內(nèi)的國家責任的區(qū)別；第三部分闡述了發(fā)達國家和發(fā)展中國家對共同但有區(qū)別的責任在國際環(huán)境法中地位的觀點和立場；第四部分以《蒙特利爾議定書》和《京都議定書》兩個典型代表性條約為例,論述了共同但有區(qū)別的責任在國際環(huán)境法文件中的體現(xiàn)以及在實踐中的實施效果；最后,在總結(jié)共同但有區(qū)別的責任在實踐中遇到的問題的基礎(chǔ)上,提出了一些完善建議和措施。同時進一步闡述了我國應(yīng)如何更好的貫徹和實施共同但有區(qū)別的責任。
[Abstract]:The earth is the place on which we live, but due to the excessive use of human beings in recent centuries, The Earth's environment is facing unprecedented challenges. Countries all over the world have recognized the importance of environmental protection. However, in the specific implementation of global environmental protection obligations and in assuming their respective responsibilities, There are great differences between developed and developing countries. A responsibility developed on the basis of international distributive justice, that is, "common but differentiated responsibilities"... is of a landmark nature in the field of international environmental protection, Its implication is that every country in the world, whether developed or developing, has an obligation to protect the environment. However, due to historical and economic conditions, the developed countries should bear more and more responsibilities. Under the guidance of this responsibility, It makes more developing countries participate in the global environmental protection, so the study of "common but differentiated responsibilities" not only has theoretical significance but also has practical significance. This paper is divided into five parts, nearly 25,000 words, mainly from the following five aspects to discuss the common but differentiated responsibilities in international environmental law. The second part mainly analyzes the differences between common but differentiated responsibilities and the traditional public international law field, the second part mainly uses the comparative method to analyze the differences between the common but differentiated responsibilities and the state responsibility in the field of traditional public international law. Part III sets out the views and positions of developed and developing countries on the status of common but differentiated responsibilities in international environmental law. Part 4th takes the two typical representative treaties of the Montreal Protocol and the Kyoto Protocol as examples. This paper discusses the embodiment of common but differentiated responsibilities in the documents of international environmental law and the effect of their implementation in practice, and finally, on the basis of summarizing the problems encountered in the practice of common but differentiated responsibilities, Some suggestions and measures are put forward. At the same time, how to implement and implement the common but differentiated responsibilities in China is further expounded.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.9

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周洪鈞;;《京都議定書》生效周年述論[J];法學;2006年03期

2 鐘斌;透視美國環(huán)境外交的立場[J];環(huán)境保護;2004年05期

3 楊興;試論國際環(huán)境法的共同但有區(qū)別的責任原則[J];時代法學;2003年01期

4 張盼;;論環(huán)境公益訴訟[J];經(jīng)濟師;2007年10期

5 邊永民;;論共同但有區(qū)別的責任原則在國際環(huán)境法中的地位[J];暨南學報(哲學社會科學版);2007年04期

6 李敏;;利益的博弈——由《京都議定書》生效引發(fā)的思考[J];理論探索;2006年03期

7 周毅之;全球化進程中的國家主權(quán)原則和公民與政府的合作關(guān)系[J];政治學研究;2001年03期

8 沈展昌;論共同但有區(qū)別的責任[J];世界環(huán)境;2004年01期

9 蘇建軍;試論國際環(huán)境公正的基本原則[J];上海師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2002年06期

10 杜萬平;;美國的環(huán)境政策:黃金時代之后步履維艱[J];生態(tài)經(jīng)濟;2007年12期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前3條

1 張美成;論國際環(huán)境法的“共同但有區(qū)別的責任原則”[D];華東政法學院;2003年

2 謝玲;試論共同但有區(qū)別責任原則[D];湖南師范大學;2005年

3 王英平;《京都議定書》及后京都時代的國際氣候制度[D];中國海洋大學;2006年

，

本文編號：1567685